Software Alternatives & Startups
Register | Login

Foam VS Formbricks

Compare Foam VS Formbricks and see what are their differences

Foam

Personal knowledge management and sharing on VSCode & GitHub

Rating
0 reviews
Pricing
Open source
Promote on VibeVoted
Alternatives Is it good?
Formbricks

Open Source Survey and Experience Management Platform

Rating
0 reviews
Pricing
Open source Freemium Free trial €49 / Monthly (Unlimited surveys, Unlimited Team Members)
Promote on VibeVoted
Alternatives Is it good?
Alterable
Real-time, open-time content for email: countdown timers, dynamic images, live product picks, geo-targeted maps, one-click surveys, and scratch-card rewards. No code, no ESP integration, rendered fresh every time someone opens. sponsored
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Which is more popular?

Based on our record, Foam should be more popular than Formbricks. It has been mentioned 49 times since March 2021.

social mentions
49 vs 15
Note Taking popularity
100% vs 0%
alternatives listed
240+ vs 217

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

Foam
Formbricks
Website foambubble.github.io formbricks.com
Pricing
Open source
Open source Freemium Free trial €49 / Monthly (Unlimited surveys, Unlimited Team Members) Official pricing
Company Startup from the United States Startup from Germany · 1 - 9 employees · 2022
Listed in
Note Taking Knowledge Base Knowledge Management Task Management +1
Open Source SaaS Customer Feedback On Premise Self Hosting Surveys Forms And Surveys Survey Tools Online Surveys +6

About Foam and Formbricks

In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.

Foam
Formbricks

No description of Foam yet.

Formbricks is a open-source survey and experience management software. With Formbricks you can create link surveys like Typeform, website surveys like HotJar Ask and targeted in-app surveys. You can gather ANY kind of feedback of ANY user segment at ANY point in the user journey. Really powerful...

Read more about Formbricks

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

Foam 6 features
Formbricks 6 features
  • Open Source
    Foam is an open-source tool, which means it is free to use and allows for community-driven development and contributions. Users can modify the source code to fit their specific needs.
  • Markdown Support
    Foam uses Markdown, a lightweight and easy-to-read syntax, making it simple to create and manage notes. This also allows for easy integration with other Markdown-based tools and platforms.
  • Integration with Visual Studio Code
    Foam is designed to work seamlessly with Visual Studio Code (VS Code). This provides users with a powerful and familiar text editor environment, complete with extensions and customization options.
  • Graph View
    Foam includes a graph visualization feature that helps users see and navigate the relationships between their notes, making it easier to understand and manage complex information.
  • Bidirectional Links
    Foam supports bidirectional links, allowing users to create connections between notes in both directions. This enhances the note-taking experience by enabling a more interconnected and dynamic information structure.
  • Community and Documentation
    Foam has a growing community of users and contributors, as well as comprehensive documentation. This support network helps users troubleshoot issues, share tips, and improve their knowledge of the tool.

Possible disadvantages

  • Limited to VS Code
    Foam relies on Visual Studio Code as its primary environment. Users who prefer different text editors or platforms might find this limitation restrictive and less convenient.
  • Learning Curve
    Although Foam leverages Markdown, users may still face a learning curve, especially if they are not familiar with VS Code or the specific features and extensions required to maximize Foam's capabilities.
  • Performance with Large Datasets
    Foam can struggle with performance issues when handling large datasets or a high number of notes. This can lead to slow response times and inefficient workflows.
  • Limited Mobile Support
    Foam is primarily designed for desktop use within VS Code, which means that mobile support is limited. Users looking for a seamless cross-platform experience might find this aspect lacking.
  • Customization Complexity
    While Foam offers a high degree of customization, setting up and configuring the tool to meet personal preferences and workflows can be complex and time-consuming for some users.
  • Website Surveys
    Run well-timed surveys on public websites (scales to millions)
  • In-app Surveys
    Run highly targeted surveys in web and mobile apps.
  • Link and Email Surveys
    Survey people via shareable links and in emails
  • Self-hosting
    Host Formbricks on premise, even the free forever Community Edition
  • Multi-language Surveys
    Run one survey in multiple languages
  • Team Access Roles
    Manage large teams on Formbricks

Analysis

An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.

Foam
Formbricks

Overall verdict

  • Yes, Foam is a good tool for those seeking an open-source environment for note-taking and knowledge management, particularly if they appreciate an approach based on markdown files and integration within a powerful text editor like Visual Studio Code. Its flexibility and user-driven customization make it suitable for users who enjoy tweaking and optimizing their workspace according to their workflow.

Why this product is good

  • Foam is a personal knowledge management and sharing system inspired by Roam Research, offering an open-source solution built on top of Visual Studio Code. It provides users with capabilities to create and interlink notes using markdown files, offering flexibility and customization suited to personal preferences. Foam supports features like backlinking, graph visualization of notes, and integration with VS Code extensions, making it a robust tool for managing interconnected information effectively.

Recommended for

  • Individuals preferring markdown-based note-taking systems
  • Developers familiar with Visual Studio Code
  • Users who appreciate open-source software and community-driven projects
  • People interested in managing complex, interconnected knowledge bases

No analysis of Formbricks yet.

Videos

Walkthroughs and reviews on video.

Foam 3 videos + Add
Formbricks 1 video + Add

These panels DESTROYED my STUDIO....REVERB? - ArrowZoom Foam Review

More videos

  • - Arrowzoom Foam Review
  • - Ryobi Foam Blaster VS. Amazon Foam Cannon | Review

Formbricks Open Source Survey Tool launches on Product Hunt

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
Foam
Formbricks
100% 100%
Note Taking
0% 0%
0% 0%
Surveys
100% 100%
100% 100%
Knowledge Base
0% 0%
0% 0%
Forms And Surveys
100% 100%

Questions & Answers

As answered by people managing Foam and Formbricks.

Which are the primary technologies used for building your product?

Formbricks's answer:

nextJS, Prisma, TypeScript, Tailwind

Who are some of the biggest customers of your product?

Formbricks's answer:

Flix (Flixbus, Flixtrain), Gumtree, Rivian, a handful of governmental organisations around the world

What makes your product unique?

Formbricks's answer:

Our open-source survey tool is very easy to use in full compliance with GDPR, CCPA, HIPAA, and all other privacy and security regulations. Skip lengthy compliance and procurement processes, just deploy our free Community Edition with Docker and upgrade when you need it 🚀

User comments

Share your experience with using Foam and Formbricks. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

Foam 49 mentions
Formbricks 15 mentions
  • AI Coding Tip 020 - Create a Second Brain
    Choose a local Markdown tool like Obsidian, Logseq, Foam, or Tolaria to store all your knowledge as plain .md files you own and control. - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago
  • Migrating from DokuWiki to Obsidian
    I've been using foam instead of obsidian for my personal knowledge base. It works rather well. And it's completely free and ultimately just markdown. While I might wish it was djot, I don't wish hard enough to make that so myself... - Source: Hacker News / about 2 years ago
  • I Use Obsidian
    I gave up on Obsidian and just use Foam (https://foambubble.github.io/foam/) and/or vimwiki. I just can’t get into overwrought, arbitrarily designed organization schemes or proprietary apps (Foam-managed content is just plain Markdown,... - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago

View more

  • Introducing Quackback: Open-Source Feedback Platform with a Built-in MCP Server
    Plausible brought open source to web analytics. Cal.com did it for scheduling. Formbricks did it for surveys. PostHog did it for product analytics. Quackback does it for feedback collection. - Source: dev.to / 9 months ago
  • Show HN: Typeform was too expensive so I built my own forms
    > An open-source alternative to Typeform and Google Forms Those two are the two extreme ends of the target audience archetypes. So, decide which is yours. > I was using Typeform, but as time went by and more people submitted forms, it... - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
  • Surveying AI Satisfaction with Formbricks in CodeStash
    So, I’ve been working on CodeStash, this platform for sharing and discussing code snippets, kind of a cross between Reddit and Stack Overflow. The cool part? There’s a built-in AI that explains code snippets, powered by Google Gemini.... - Source: dev.to / about 2 years ago

View more

Alternatives to Foam and Formbricks

When comparing Foam and Formbricks, you can also consider the following products.

Loading...