An unexpected gift. January 07, 2018 by Michael. One of the nice things that happened last week was an fman user writing in to say that 1) fman "is THE BEST SOFTWARE" (sic). And that 2) he would like to send me a $50 tip.
Tap a thing and the counter resets. A quiet, local-first day counter for the things you keep meaning to do. No account needed, no spreadsheet.
sponsored
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Which is more popular?
Based on our record, fman
seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned
10 times
since March 2021.
social mentions
10 vs 0
File Manager popularity
100% vs 0%
Base details
Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.
Cross-Platform Availability fman is available on macOS, Windows, and Linux, allowing users to have a consistent file management experience across different operating systems.
Performance fman is built to be lightweight and fast, which can result in quicker file operations and a more responsive interface compared to some other file managers.
Plugin System fman offers a plugin system that allows users to extend its functionality according to their needs, which fosters a customizable experience.
Dual-Pane Interface The dual-pane interface is highly efficient for tasks that involve moving or copying files between directories, offering a productivity boost for power users.
Keyboard Shortcuts Extensive keyboard shortcut support lets advanced users perform operations quickly without needing to use the mouse, speeding up file management tasks.
Possible disadvantages
Paid Software fman is not free; it requires a purchase for continuous use, which might be a drawback for users looking for a free alternative.
Limited Built-In Features Out-of-the-box, fman might lack some advanced features found in other file managers, requiring users to install plugins to achieve the same functionality.
Learning Curve New users might experience a learning curve when adapting to fman's interface and keyboard shortcuts, especially if they are coming from more traditional file managers.
Plugin Management While the plugin system is a pro, managing and finding the right plugins can be cumbersome for some users. Additionally, community plugins might vary in quality.
UI Design Some users might find the minimalist design too simplistic compared to other file managers, potentially missing out on a richer, more feature-complete interface.
No-code website modifications Modify allows users to make changes to their websites without needing to write code, making it accessible for non-developers who want to customize their web presence quickly.
Easy A/B testing and personalization The platform enables users to run A/B tests and personalize website content for different audiences without requiring developer involvement, speeding up optimization efforts.
Quick deployment Changes can be deployed rapidly through Modify's interface, bypassing the traditional development cycle and reducing time-to-market for website updates and experiments.
Visual editor Modify provides a visual editor that lets users point-and-click to make changes on their site, making it intuitive and reducing the learning curve for new users.
No impact on site codebase Since modifications are applied as an overlay rather than directly changing the source code, the original codebase remains clean and unaffected, reducing the risk of breaking existing functionality.
Possible disadvantages
Limited awareness and community Modify is a relatively niche tool with a smaller user base compared to established competitors like Google Optimize or Optimizely, which means fewer community resources, tutorials, and third-party integrations.
Performance concerns Applying modifications via a third-party script layer can introduce additional page load time or cause flickering effects as changes are rendered on top of the original page content.
Limited customization depth While the no-code approach is convenient for simple changes, more complex modifications or deeply integrated features may still require developer intervention, limiting what can be achieved through the platform alone.
Dependency on third-party service Relying on Modify means your website changes are dependent on their service uptime and continuity. If the service goes down or shuts down, applied modifications could be lost.
Potential SEO implications Client-side modifications applied via JavaScript overlays may not be fully recognized by search engine crawlers, which could lead to discrepancies between what users see and what gets indexed.
Analysis
An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.
fmanModify
Overall verdict
fman is a solid choice for users seeking a customizable and efficient file management solution. However, those who prefer a more graphical interface with advanced features out-of-the-box may need to look at alternative solutions.
Why this product is good
fman is a dual-pane file manager designed to enhance productivity by allowing users to efficiently organize and manage their files across different platforms. It is especially appreciated for its extensibility, as users can create or download plugins to tailor the software to their specific needs. Additionally, its minimalistic design and multi-platform support make it an appealing choice for those who frequently switch between operating systems.
Recommended for
Developers and IT professionals who require a cross-platform file manager.
Users who appreciate customizability through plugins.
Individuals looking for a lightweight and speed-oriented file manager.
Overall verdict
Modify (modifyhq.com) is a solid choice for marketing teams that want to personalize website content dynamically without heavy engineering support. It's particularly strong for conversion rate optimization and ABM-style personalization, though it may be overkill for very small sites with low traffic.
Why this product is good
Allows real-time website personalization based on visitor attributes like UTM parameters, referral source, location, or ad campaign
No-code / low-code editor makes it accessible to marketers without developer resources
Integrates with common ad platforms and CRMs to tailor messaging to specific audience segments
Useful for account-based marketing (ABM) campaigns by customizing landing pages for target accounts
Provides analytics to measure the impact of personalized content on conversion rates
Faster iteration cycle for A/B testing and content variation compared to manual dev-driven changes
Recommended for
Marketing teams running paid ad campaigns who want tailored landing pages per audience segment
A very simple dual-window view file manager. The only extra feature I saw was the search bar at the top that you can use to quickly access anything. However, it’s also really small in size and light on resources, so...
I once devoted 2 years of my life to developing a file manager called fman [1]. In total, it generated probably 35,000$ in profits, so my income from the project is somewhere under 10 $/h. As software developers, our opportunity costs...
- Source: Hacker News
/
over 1 year ago
Krusader is an advanced twin panel (commander style) file manager for KDE and other desktops in the *nix world, similar to Midnight or Total Commander.Get your copy of the Krusader .
Polo is a modern, dynamic and powerful file manager for Linux operating systems, written in Vala. It attempts to fold in several drive/devices management functions similar to Windows Explorer, and offers several innovative display layouts.
Midnight Commander
Double Commander
Vifm
Krusader
Thunar
Polo
Caja
