Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login
CQ

Fluid VS CodeQuest

Compare Fluid VS CodeQuest and see what are their differences

Draxlr
Turn SQL Data into Decisions. Build professional dashboards and data visualizations without technical expertise. Easily embed analytics anywhere, receive automated alerts, and discover AI-powered insights all through a straightforward interface. featured
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

Fluid logo Fluid

Turn Your Favorite Web Apps into Real Mac Apps.

CodeQuest logo CodeQuest

Mini-games that intro kids to HTML and web development
  • Fluid Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-07-29
  • CodeQuest Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-26

Fluid features and specs

  • Dedicated Browsers
    Fluid creates site-specific browsers that allow users to have dedicated apps for their favorite web pages. This can enhance focus and organization by keeping tasks separate from regular web browsing.
  • Custom User Experience
    Each Site Specific Browser (SSB) can have a custom icon and name, providing a more personalized and aesthetically pleasing user interface.
  • Resource Management
    Having dedicated apps for regularly used web services can minimize the use of browser tabs and extensions, potentially leading to better performance and resource management.
  • Independence from Web Browser
    Fluid apps are independent of the main web browser. This means that if your browser crashes or has issues, your Fluid apps remain unaffected.
  • Enhanced Productivity
    By converting web apps into standalone desktop applications, users can more easily compartmentalize their work, leading to enhanced productivity.

Possible disadvantages of Fluid

  • Limited to MacOS
    Fluid is available only for MacOS, which limits its usability to Mac users and excludes users on other operating systems like Windows or Linux.
  • Manual Updates
    Users need to manually update each Site Specific Browser (SSB) created through Fluid, as these do not automatically update like regular browser tabs.
  • Security Risks
    As Fluid apps are essentially wrappers for web pages, they are subject to the same security risks as any web browser. Users need to ensure they are visiting trusted sites.
  • Limited Functionality
    Unlike full-fledged desktop applications, Fluid apps might have limited native functionality. They rely heavily on the web app's own features and may lack advanced desktop integrations.
  • Cost for Full Features
    While Fluid is free to use, certain advanced features, such as pinning apps to the status bar, require a one-time purchase of Fluid's paid version.

CodeQuest features and specs

  • Interactive Learning
    CodeQuest offers an engaging and interactive platform that makes learning coding fun and accessible for children, using games and challenges to teach programming concepts.
  • Child-Friendly Design
    The platform is designed specifically for a younger audience, which means it is easy to navigate and visually appealing for kids.
  • Skill Development
    By completing the challenges on CodeQuest, children can develop critical thinking and problem-solving skills which are essential for programming.
  • Motivational Progression
    The platform uses a progression system that encourages continued learning and skill development by rewarding users for completing tasks and advancing levels.

Possible disadvantages of CodeQuest

  • Limited Advanced Content
    While it is excellent for beginners, CodeQuest might not offer sufficient advanced material for children who have moved beyond the basics of coding.
  • Internet Access Requirement
    Users need a stable internet connection to access CodeQuest, which can be a limitation for those with unreliable internet services.
  • Platform Dependence
    The learning experience is heavily reliant on the platform's infrastructure and updates, meaning any bugs or downtime could disrupt learning.
  • Subscription Costs
    Depending on the pricing model, there may be subscription costs involved, which could be a barrier for some users.

Analysis of Fluid

Overall verdict

  • Fluid is a good option for macOS users who find themselves frequently switching between web applications and want a more streamlined process. It's especially useful for those who prefer to keep web app sessions isolated or those who enjoy customizing their workflows. However, consider that it is only available for macOS and may not support all features of more complex web applications.

Why this product is good

  • Fluid (fluidapp.com) allows users to create site-specific browsers, which can be useful for treating web applications as standalone apps on macOS. This can help with productivity by preventing web distractions and organizing workflows. Fluid is particularly beneficial if you frequently use web apps and want them to function like native applications with their own dock icons and separate sessions.

Recommended for

  • MacOS users looking to create desktop-like experiences for web applications.
  • Individuals seeking to minimize distractions from other open tabs in a standard browser.
  • Users who need isolated sessions for different web applications.
  • People who appreciate customizing their desktop workflow.

Fluid videos

+ Add

Primochill Vue Fluid Review

More videos:

  • Review - FluidReview - Accept Online Applications and Submissions and Review
  • Review - Golden Matte Fluid Acrylic Review • An Alternative to Gouache?

CodeQuest videos

+ Add

CodeQuest v1.3 iPad Review!

More videos:

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Fluid and CodeQuest)

Fluid

CodeQuest

Group Chat & Notifications
100 100%
Group Chat & Notifications
0% 0
Data Dashboard
0 0%
Data Dashboard
100% 100
Mac
100 100%
Mac
0% 0
Work Marketplace
0 0%
Work Marketplace
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Fluid and CodeQuest. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Fluid and CodeQuest

Fluid Reviews

10+ Best Prototyping Tools for UI/UX Designers in 2018
With a strong focus on simplicity and communication, Fluid UI great Prototyping tools. Having built-in high and low fidelity component libraries, live team collaboration, device previews and video presentations making it a top-notch solution for designers, product managers and founders alike.
Source: blog.prototypr.io

CodeQuest Reviews

We have no reviews of CodeQuest yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Fluid seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 19 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Fluid mentions (19)

  • ToDesktop – Web app to desktop app in minutes
    > Is ToDesktop For Me? > If you want to make a desktop app of a website for your personal use, ToDesktop is overkill. I just want to point out that a lot of us "pros" learn how to use tools like this by semi-personal use. Therefore, you might want to consider a free personal version that's crippled in a mildly annoying way: For example, no installer, don't sign the app, and have an easily-ignorable nag. (Therefore... - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
  • in safari Sonoma, do profiles act like containers ? (firefox container)
    If you haven't used Fluid - https://fluidapp.com , I would recommend trying the free download. Source: almost 2 years ago
  • Why is it so hard to change Chromium's UI?
    You can use Min, Fluid or any browser with full screen mode to have the same effect. Source: about 2 years ago
  • Safari Window Management
    Https://fluidapp.com/ might do it for you. Other applications like this also exist. Source: about 2 years ago
  • Web Push for Web Apps on iOS and iPadOS
    Does Fluid[1] work as a solution for you? I’m on an older OS with an older version but I love it for creating single-site apps. [1] https://fluidapp.com/. - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago
View more

CodeQuest mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of CodeQuest yet. Tracking of CodeQuest recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Fluid and CodeQuest, you can also consider the following products

WebCatalog - Run your favorite web apps natively

Forest Admin - Execute fast and at scale with no time wasted on internal tools developed in-house.

Web2Desk - Web2Desk is a tool to convert your favorite websites to Desktop app in just one click.

Codementor - “Instant help from expert developers. Codementor is your instant 1:1 expert mentor helping you in real time.”

Nativeifier - Turn any webpage into a native app

Andela - Hire developers from Africa to code for your startup

Loading...