RPC over an inter-communication messaging queue for service-oriented Node & TypeScript back-ends. Self-describing services generate their own clients — no boilerplate, no service discovery, no load balancer.
Clear, Fast & Unlimited. Residential & Mobile Proxies For Best Price.
sponsored
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Which is more popular?
Based on our record, Fluid
seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned
19 times
since March 2021.
social mentions
19 vs 0
Productivity popularity
100% vs 0%
alternatives listed
78 vs 2
Base details
Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.
Dedicated Browsers Fluid creates site-specific browsers that allow users to have dedicated apps for their favorite web pages. This can enhance focus and organization by keeping tasks separate from regular web browsing.
Custom User Experience Each Site Specific Browser (SSB) can have a custom icon and name, providing a more personalized and aesthetically pleasing user interface.
Resource Management Having dedicated apps for regularly used web services can minimize the use of browser tabs and extensions, potentially leading to better performance and resource management.
Independence from Web Browser Fluid apps are independent of the main web browser. This means that if your browser crashes or has issues, your Fluid apps remain unaffected.
Enhanced Productivity By converting web apps into standalone desktop applications, users can more easily compartmentalize their work, leading to enhanced productivity.
Possible disadvantages
Limited to MacOS Fluid is available only for MacOS, which limits its usability to Mac users and excludes users on other operating systems like Windows or Linux.
Manual Updates Users need to manually update each Site Specific Browser (SSB) created through Fluid, as these do not automatically update like regular browser tabs.
Security Risks As Fluid apps are essentially wrappers for web pages, they are subject to the same security risks as any web browser. Users need to ensure they are visiting trusted sites.
Limited Functionality Unlike full-fledged desktop applications, Fluid apps might have limited native functionality. They rely heavily on the web app's own features and may lack advanced desktop integrations.
Cost for Full Features While Fluid is free to use, certain advanced features, such as pinning apps to the status bar, require a one-time purchase of Fluid's paid version.
TypeScript-first design imqueue is built with TypeScript at its core, providing strong typing, better IDE support, and compile-time error checking, which helps catch bugs early and improves the developer experience when building microservices.
RPC-style messaging abstraction It simplifies inter-service communication by abstracting away the complexities of message queue protocols, allowing developers to make calls that feel like local function calls while the underlying complexity of message passing is handled by the framework.
Built on RabbitMQ By leveraging RabbitMQ as its message broker, imqueue benefits from a mature, battle-tested messaging system with reliable delivery guarantees, clustering support, and a large ecosystem of tools and documentation.
Code generation and tooling imqueue provides CLI tools and code generation capabilities that can automatically create service clients and boilerplate code, reducing repetitive work and helping maintain consistency across microservices.
Microservices-focused architecture The framework is specifically designed for building distributed microservices systems, offering features like service discovery and structured communication patterns that address common challenges in distributed system design.
Possible disadvantages
Smaller community and ecosystem Compared to more mainstream microservices frameworks, imqueue has a relatively small user base and community, which can mean fewer third-party resources, tutorials, Stack Overflow answers, and community-contributed plugins or extensions.
Limited documentation depth While basic documentation exists, some users report that advanced use cases, edge cases, and troubleshooting guides are not as thoroughly documented as more established frameworks, requiring more trial-and-error or direct code inspection.
RabbitMQ dependency lock-in Being tightly coupled to RabbitMQ means teams must adopt and manage this specific message broker, which could be a limitation for organizations that prefer or already use alternative messaging systems like Kafka, NATS, or AWS SQS.
Learning curve for framework-specific patterns Developers need to learn imqueue's specific conventions, decorators, and architectural patterns, which adds an additional learning curve on top of understanding TypeScript and general microservices concepts.
Potential scalability concerns for very large systems As with many queue-based RPC frameworks, extremely high-throughput or very large-scale distributed systems may encounter performance bottlenecks or require significant additional configuration and tuning of the underlying RabbitMQ infrastructure.
Analysis
An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.
Fluid@imqueue
Overall verdict
Fluid is a good option for macOS users who find themselves frequently switching between web applications and want a more streamlined process. It's especially useful for those who prefer to keep web app sessions isolated or those who enjoy customizing their workflows. However, consider that it is only available for macOS and may not support all features of more complex web applications.
Why this product is good
Fluid (fluidapp.com) allows users to create site-specific browsers, which can be useful for treating web applications as standalone apps on macOS. This can help with productivity by preventing web distractions and organizing workflows. Fluid is particularly beneficial if you frequently use web apps and want them to function like native applications with their own dock icons and separate sessions.
Recommended for
MacOS users looking to create desktop-like experiences for web applications.
Individuals seeking to minimize distractions from other open tabs in a standard browser.
Users who need isolated sessions for different web applications.
People who appreciate customizing their desktop workflow.
With a strong focus on simplicity and communication, Fluid UI great Prototyping tools. Having built-in high and low fidelity component libraries, live team collaboration, device previews and video presentations making...
> Is ToDesktop For Me? > If you want to make a desktop app of a website for your personal use, ToDesktop is overkill. I just want to point out that a lot of us "pros" learn how to use tools like this by semi-personal use. Therefore, you...
- Source: Hacker News
/
about 3 years ago
in safari Sonoma, do profiles act like containers ? (firefox container)
If you haven't used Fluid - https://fluidapp.com , I would recommend trying the free download.
Source:
over 3 years ago
Why is it so hard to change Chromium's UI?
You can use Min, Fluid or any browser with full screen mode to have the same effect.
Source:
over 3 years ago
With Anypoint MQ, perform advanced asynchronous messaging scenarios — such as queueing and pub/sub — with hosted and managed cloud message queues and exchanges.
Digital workspace organizer that allows you to unify as many applications as you want, all in one place. It is perfect for those who care about productivity while working with many business and personal apps.
WebCatalog New Tab
Nativeifier
ToDesktop
Rambox
Unite for macOS
Electron
Shift
Anypoint MQ
NSQ
