Software Alternatives & Reviews

Flow Type VS jRuby

Compare Flow Type VS jRuby and see what are their differences

Flow Type logo Flow Type

A Static Type Checker for JavaScript

jRuby logo jRuby

A high performance, stable, fully threaded Java implementation of the Ruby programming language
  • Flow Type Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-01-26
  • jRuby Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-06-24

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Flow Type and jRuby)
Programming Language
62 62%
38% 38
OOP
35 35%
65% 65
Programming
100 100%
0% 0
Generic Programming Language

User comments

Share your experience with using Flow Type and jRuby. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Flow Type seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 24 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Flow Type mentions (24)

  • Is TypeScript actually worth It?
    I love JS, but I want types. I don't want TypeScript though, but I'll do it if the job requires it. Has anyone tried building in flow for a large project? This was facebook's static type checking approach: https://flow.org/. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
  • How I improved my JS code with these 3 functions
    In my examples, I’ll use the Flow type system so that it’s easier to follow the idea. The code consists of two parts: a service API and a recommendation flow. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
  • Guido van Rossum: Python and the Future of Programming | Lex Fridman Podcast #341
    You think we could try to make it such that people use JS + Flow the static type checker. Source: over 1 year ago
  • Front-end Guide
    The two biggest contenders in adding static types to JavaScript are Flow (by Facebook) and TypeScript (by Microsoft). As of date, there is no clear winner in the battle. For now, we have made the choice of using Flow. We find that Flow has a lower learning curve as compared to TypeScript and it requires relatively less effort to migrate an existing code base to Flow. Being built by Facebook, Flow has better... - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
  • Flow - a little language I've been working on
    Just FYI, Facebook has a JS dialect called Flow. There was a point in time that Flow and TypeScript were duking it out, but clearly TS has won. I think Flow is still used inside Facebook, but I don't think it has really caught on in the larger developer ecosystem. Source: over 1 year ago
View more

jRuby mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of jRuby yet. Tracking of jRuby recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Flow Type and jRuby, you can also consider the following products

Typescript - TypeScript allows developers to compile a superset of JavaScript to plain JavaScript on any browser, host, or operating system.

Scala Lang - Scala is a pure-bred object-oriented language that runs on the JVM

Firefox Developer Tools - Examine, edit, and debug HTML, CSS, and JavaScript on the desktop and on mobile.

JavaScript - Lightweight, interpreted, object-oriented language with first-class functions

Elixir - Dynamic, functional language designed for building scalable and maintainable applications

ReasonML - ReasonML is a new face to OCaml that--when coupled with BuckleScript--makes web development easy...