Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

FilamentQL VS GraphQL Centaur

Compare FilamentQL VS GraphQL Centaur and see what are their differences

ScreenshotMAX
The all-in-one Screenshot API for developers: capture websites, generate PDFs, record videos, and automate it all with powerful, scalable infrastructure. No browser setup, no hassle. Just clean results, fast. featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Reviews
  3. » Alternatives

FilamentQL logo FilamentQL

FilamentQL is a lightweight caching library for GraphQL.

GraphQL Centaur logo GraphQL Centaur

Generate GraphQL resolvers easily with GraphQL Centaur CLI
  • FilamentQL Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-08-23
  • GraphQL Centaur Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-08-18

FilamentQL features and specs

  • GraphQL Optimization
    FilamentQL is designed to optimize GraphQL queries, potentially improving performance by reducing the amount of data that needs to be fetched and processed.
  • Open Source
    Being an open-source project, FilamentQL allows for community contributions and transparency, enabling developers to customize and improve the tool as needed.
  • Enhanced Efficiency
    By potentially streamlining database queries and interactions, FilamentQL can lead to more efficient data fetching strategies and reduce server load.
  • Ease of Integration
    FilamentQL can be integrated into existing GraphQL setups, providing an additional layer of optimization without requiring major overhauls to existing systems.

Possible disadvantages of FilamentQL

  • Limited Adoption
    As a project hosted on GitHub with potentially fewer contributors, FilamentQL might not have the widespread community support and ecosystem compared to more established tools.
  • Learning Curve
    Developers may need time to understand and effectively implement FilamentQL, especially if they are new to GraphQL or similar optimization tools.
  • Potential Stability Issues
    Open-source projects can sometimes encounter stability and maintenance challenges, particularly if active development is not sustained over time.
  • Compatibility Concerns
    There might be compatibility issues with certain GraphQL setups or existing libraries, requiring additional effort to make FilamentQL work seamlessly in all environments.

GraphQL Centaur features and specs

  • Efficiency
    GraphQL Centaur can optimize query performance by allowing you to request exactly the data you need, reducing unnecessary data transfer.
  • Real-time Collaboration
    Supports real-time collaboration features which can be very helpful for distributed teams working on the same GraphQL schema.
  • Schema Visualization
    Provides tools for visualizing the GraphQL schema, making it easier to understand and navigate complex relationships.
  • Cross-platform Support
    The CLI tool is compatible with multiple operating systems, making it accessible to a wider range of developers.
  • Integration
    Offers integration with various development environments and CI/CD pipelines, enhancing overall workflow efficiency.

Possible disadvantages of GraphQL Centaur

  • Complexity
    The tool might have a steep learning curve for beginners who are not familiar with GraphQL or CLI tools.
  • Overhead
    May introduce additional overhead in terms of maintaining the configurations and setup, especially for small projects.
  • Dependency Management
    Depending on the project's needs, the additional dependencies that come with using this tool may affect project maintenance.
  • Limited Community Support
    Since it's a niche tool, finding community support or resources for troubleshooting might be more challenging compared to more established GraphQL tools.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to FilamentQL and GraphQL Centaur)

FilamentQL

GraphQL Centaur

Developer Tools
44 44%
Developer Tools
56% 56
Realtime Backend / API
42 42%
Realtime Backend / API
58% 58
GraphQL
34 34%
GraphQL
66% 66
GitHub
100 100%
GitHub
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using FilamentQL and GraphQL Centaur. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, GraphQL Centaur seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 1 time since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

FilamentQL mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of FilamentQL yet. Tracking of FilamentQL recommendations started around Mar 2021.

GraphQL Centaur mentions (1)

  • GraphQL Editor - the journey from initial release to version 5.0
    You can deploy microservices directly from our built-in Live Editor (similar to those you may know from Git-based platforms), but the recommended way is to do it using graphql-editor-cli. Although microservices are great for testing and development purposes, we do not recommend using them on production as they run on very small machines with rate limit of 200 requests per minute & 1 000 000 requests per month.... - Source: dev.to / almost 4 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing FilamentQL and GraphQL Centaur, you can also consider the following products

Hasura - Hasura is an open platform to build scalable app backends, offering a built-in database, search, user-management and more.

GraphQL Playground - GraphQL IDE for better development workflows

GraphQl Editor - Editor for GraphQL that lets you draw GraphQL schemas using visual nodes

QuellQL - Quell provides a caching solution for GraphQL

Explore GraphQL - GraphQL benefits, success stories, guides, and more

Stellate.co - Everything you need to run your GraphQL API at scale

Loading...