fd VS SST

Compare fd VS SST and see what are their differences

Castmint

Type one line. Get a finished short. sponsored

Contents:

» Base Details
» Videos
» Reviews
» Alternatives

fd

A simple, fast and user-friendly alternative to 'find'.

SST

Work on your serverless apps live

Landing page //
2023-08-18

Landing page //
2023-08-27

fd

Website: github.com
$ Details
Startup details
Country: Germany

Edit details

SST

Website: github.com
$ Details: -

Edit details

fd features and specs

Speed
fd is optimized for speed and can outperform traditional tools like find due to its use of parallelism and optimized algorithms.
Ease of Use
fd has a simpler and more user-friendly syntax compared to find, making it easier to learn and use.
Colorized Output
fd provides colorized output by default, making it easier to differentiate between file types and enhancing readability.
Smart Case
fd enables smart case detection by default, meaning searches are case-insensitive unless the pattern includes an uppercase letter.
Defaults to Ignoring Hidden Files
By default, fd ignores hidden files and directories, as well as files specified in .gitignore, helping to narrow down search results to relevant files.
Cross-Platform Support
fd supports multiple platforms including Linux, macOS, and Windows, making it versatile for different development environments.

Possible disadvantages of fd

Dependency on Rust
fd requires the Rust toolchain to build, which may be inconvenient for environments where installing additional dependencies is restricted.
Limited to Modern Features
fd may not support some legacy systems and older versions of operating systems, limiting its applicability in certain scenarios.
Not as Feature-Rich
While fd is easier to use, it doesn't have all the advanced features and fine-grained control options that find offers.
Compatibility
fd’s simplified syntax and modern features may not be directly compatible with scripts or workflows that depend on find, requiring adjustments for integration.

SST features and specs

Ease of Use
SST is designed to simplify the process of building serverless applications, providing developers with higher-level abstractions and tools that streamline development.
Integration with AWS
SST is well-integrated with AWS services, allowing developers to leverage the full power of AWS infrastructure while maintaining a focus on serverless architecture.
Live Lambda Development
SST supports live Lambda development, enabling developers to make real-time changes and see them reflected immediately without the need for lengthy deployment processes.
Infrastructure as Code
With SST, developers can define their infrastructure programmatically, which promotes version control, scalability, and collaboration among team members.
Flexibility
SST provides flexibility to developers, allowing them to use popular libraries and frameworks alongside serverless components, thus accommodating various use cases.

Possible disadvantages of SST

Learning Curve
Developers unfamiliar with SST and its abstractions may face a learning curve in understanding how to effectively use the toolkit and take full advantage of its features.
AWS Lock-in
As SST is tightly integrated with AWS services, it can lead to vendor lock-in, making it challenging for organizations to switch to other cloud providers in the future.
Complexity for Small Projects
For smaller projects, the overhead introduced by SST's abstractions and tooling might be unnecessary, adding complexity without significant benefits.
Dependency on Community Support
SST relies on community support for maintenance and feature development, which could pose a risk if the community's interest wanes or if support does not keep pace with AWS innovations.

Analysis of fd

Overall verdict

Yes, fd (github.com) is generally considered good, particularly for its speed, ease of use, and modern features that enhance productivity over the traditional 'find' command.

Why this product is good

fd is a program for users who need a fast and user-friendly alternative to the traditional 'find' command. It provides a simple syntax, speed improvements by parallelizing search processes, ignores hidden files and directories by default, and offers colorized outputs, making it more intuitive and efficient for everyday use.

Recommended for

fd is recommended for developers, system administrators, and power users who often search through directories and require a fast, efficient tool with a shorter learning curve.

fd videos

+ Add

Discmania FD (Fairway Driver) Golf Disc Review

SST videos

+ Add

Performix sst review fat burner

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to fd and SST)

SST

Note Taking

100 100%

Note Taking

0% 0

Developer Tools

51 51%

Developer Tools

49% 49

Productivity

100 100%

Productivity

0% 0

Open Source

0 0%

Open Source

100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using fd and SST. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, fd should be more popular than SST. It has been mentiond 129 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

fd mentions (129)

I wrote an bash enumerator because I was sick of xargs
> Find works, but the syntax is arcane. Fd is a lifesaver: https://github.com/sharkdp/fd. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 month ago
Biff is a command line datetime Swiss army knife
I know that if you want `fd` (https://github.com/sharkdp/fd) you need to `apt install fd-find` and which installs the binary `fdfind` (!). - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago
5 CLI Tools I Use to Keep Terminal Workflows Less Annoying
Fd is a friendlier, faster alternative to find, with sensible defaults and clean output. - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago
Rewriting essential Linux packages in Rust
Fd is also great and I install it everywhere. https://github.com/sharkdp/fd. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
Apple's Software Quality Crisis: When Premium Hardware Meets Subpar Software
It's not just the OS itself, where some of the slowness can at least be explained by the silo-ed nature of development and the large amount of moving parts. But even when MS gives a small-ish team free reign and a fresh start, the software is just agonizingly slow and buggy. Example 1: new PowerToys https://github.com/microsoft/PowerToys/ and has not improved since Win7. Who cares, nobody ever searches for files,... - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago

SST mentions (31)

Best/low maintenance devops toolchain for basic sass?
After researching all night, https://github.com/serverless-stack/sst seems like a good trade off between flexibility, simplicity and features. Source: over 3 years ago
Dynamodb design with Appsync
I use https://github.com/serverless-stack/serverless-stack — not the serverless project. This one is far better. Source: over 4 years ago
A magical AWS serverless developer experience
That said: SST is open source, so you could maybe somehow reimplement their debug stack which is the websockets magic + the Lambda shim in terraform to get it working... Source: over 4 years ago
Anti-Patterns to Avoid in Lambda Based Apps
If you are using CDK then check out SST: https://github.com/serverless-stack/serverless-stack It's based on CDK and has a great local development environment for Lambda. It allows you to set breakpoints and test it locally: https://serverless-stack.com/examples/how-to-debug-lambda-functions-with-visual-studio-code.html. - Source: Hacker News / almost 5 years ago
Introducing Serverless Cloud: AWS Serverless Power for Back-Ends—Without the Complexity
I'll just plug what we built, SST: https://github.com/serverless-stack/serverless-stack. Source: almost 5 years ago