Software Alternatives & Startups
Register | Login

fd VS Scan For Table

Compare fd VS Scan For Table and see what are their differences

fd

A simple, fast and user-friendly alternative to 'find'.

Rating
0 reviews
Pricing
Open source
Alternatives Is it good?
Scan For Table

Please scan to be seated, a restaurant wait list SaaS

Rating
0 reviews
Alternatives Is it good?
Modelence
Create production-ready applications with zero code sponsored
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Which is more popular?

Based on our record, fd seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 130 times since March 2021.

social mentions
130 vs 0
Note Taking popularity
100% vs 0%
alternatives listed
72 vs 11

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

fd
Scan For Table
Website github.com scanfortable.com
Pricing
Open source
—
Company Startup from Germany —
Listed in
Terminal Tools Developer Tools API Tools Linux +1
Tech Online Payments Fintech Marketing Platform +1

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

fd 6 features
Scan For Table 0 features
  • Speed
    fd is optimized for speed and can outperform traditional tools like find due to its use of parallelism and optimized algorithms.
  • Ease of Use
    fd has a simpler and more user-friendly syntax compared to find, making it easier to learn and use.
  • Colorized Output
    fd provides colorized output by default, making it easier to differentiate between file types and enhancing readability.
  • Smart Case
    fd enables smart case detection by default, meaning searches are case-insensitive unless the pattern includes an uppercase letter.
  • Defaults to Ignoring Hidden Files
    By default, fd ignores hidden files and directories, as well as files specified in .gitignore, helping to narrow down search results to relevant files.
  • Cross-Platform Support
    fd supports multiple platforms including Linux, macOS, and Windows, making it versatile for different development environments.

Possible disadvantages

  • Dependency on Rust
    fd requires the Rust toolchain to build, which may be inconvenient for environments where installing additional dependencies is restricted.
  • Limited to Modern Features
    fd may not support some legacy systems and older versions of operating systems, limiting its applicability in certain scenarios.
  • Not as Feature-Rich
    While fd is easier to use, it doesn't have all the advanced features and fine-grained control options that find offers.
  • Compatibility
    fd’s simplified syntax and modern features may not be directly compatible with scripts or workflows that depend on find, requiring adjustments for integration.

No features have been listed yet.

Analysis

An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.

fd
Scan For Table

Overall verdict

  • Yes, fd (github.com) is generally considered good, particularly for its speed, ease of use, and modern features that enhance productivity over the traditional 'find' command.

Why this product is good

  • fd is a program for users who need a fast and user-friendly alternative to the traditional 'find' command. It provides a simple syntax, speed improvements by parallelizing search processes, ignores hidden files and directories by default, and offers colorized outputs, making it more intuitive and efficient for everyday use.

Recommended for

    fd is recommended for developers, system administrators, and power users who often search through directories and require a fast, efficient tool with a shorter learning curve.

No analysis of Scan For Table yet.

Videos

Walkthroughs and reviews on video.

fd 3 videos + Add
Scan For Table 0 videos + Add

Discmania FD (Fairway Driver) Golf Disc Review

More videos

  • - Honda Civic FD | Review & Tips If you want to own one
  • - Regular Car Reviews: 1993 Mazda RX-7 FD

No Scan For Table videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
fd
Scan For Table
100% 100%
Note Taking
0% 0%
0% 0%
Tech
100% 100%
100% 100%
Productivity
0% 0%
0% 0%
Fintech
100% 100%

User comments

Share your experience with using fd and Scan For Table. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

fd 130 mentions
Scan For Table 0 mentions
  • I Replaced a 461-Million-Downloads-a-Month Glob Package With One Rust File
    Fast-glob was the Package Killer target, but it was not the only comparison worth making. Developers often reach for fd or ripgrep when they need to locate files from a terminal. They are mature native tools with excellent defaults, so... - Source: dev.to / 26 days ago
  • I wrote an bash enumerator because I was sick of xargs
    > Find works, but the syntax is arcane. Fd is a lifesaver: https://github.com/sharkdp/fd. - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago
  • Biff is a command line datetime Swiss army knife
    I know that if you want `fd` (https://github.com/sharkdp/fd) you need to `apt install fd-find` and which installs the binary `fdfind` (!). - Source: Hacker News / 4 months ago

View more

Tracking Scan For Table since Mar 2021.

Alternatives to fd and Scan For Table

When comparing fd and Scan For Table, you can also consider the following products.

Loading...