Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

fd VS Pl@ntNet

Compare fd VS Pl@ntNet and see what are their differences

Postbot
Postbot is a 24/7 AI receptionist that answers your business calls, books appointments, and ensures you never miss a customer again. featured
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

fd logo fd

A simple, fast and user-friendly alternative to 'find'.

Pl@ntNet logo Pl@ntNet

Pl@ntNet is an intelligent tool that allows user to identify the plats based on pictures with the help of your smartphone.
  • fd Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-08-18
  • Pl@ntNet Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-06-06

fd features and specs

  • Speed
    fd is optimized for speed and can outperform traditional tools like find due to its use of parallelism and optimized algorithms.
  • Ease of Use
    fd has a simpler and more user-friendly syntax compared to find, making it easier to learn and use.
  • Colorized Output
    fd provides colorized output by default, making it easier to differentiate between file types and enhancing readability.
  • Smart Case
    fd enables smart case detection by default, meaning searches are case-insensitive unless the pattern includes an uppercase letter.
  • Defaults to Ignoring Hidden Files
    By default, fd ignores hidden files and directories, as well as files specified in .gitignore, helping to narrow down search results to relevant files.
  • Cross-Platform Support
    fd supports multiple platforms including Linux, macOS, and Windows, making it versatile for different development environments.

Possible disadvantages of fd

  • Dependency on Rust
    fd requires the Rust toolchain to build, which may be inconvenient for environments where installing additional dependencies is restricted.
  • Limited to Modern Features
    fd may not support some legacy systems and older versions of operating systems, limiting its applicability in certain scenarios.
  • Not as Feature-Rich
    While fd is easier to use, it doesn't have all the advanced features and fine-grained control options that find offers.
  • Compatibility
    fd’s simplified syntax and modern features may not be directly compatible with scripts or workflows that depend on find, requiring adjustments for integration.

Pl@ntNet features and specs

  • User-Friendly Interface
    Pl@ntNet offers a simple and intuitive interface that allows users to easily upload images and receive plant identification results, making it accessible for both amateur and professional botanists.
  • Community Contribution
    The platform allows users to contribute images and observations, enabling a collaborative effort to improve and expand the database, enhancing the accuracy of identifications over time.
  • Extensive Database
    Pl@ntNet covers a wide range of plant species globally, providing a comprehensive resource for identifying a vast array of plants, trees, and flowers from different regions.
  • Free Access
    The tool is available for free, making it accessible to anyone interested in plant identification without the need for a subscription or payment.
  • Scientific Collaboration
    Pl@ntNet collaborates with various scientific institutions, ensuring that the database is enriched with scientifically validated information and expert contributions.

Possible disadvantages of Pl@ntNet

  • Internet Dependency
    Pl@ntNet requires an internet connection to access its database and identification services, which can be a limitation in remote areas with poor connectivity.
  • Accuracy Limitations
    While the platform is generally accurate, there can be occasional errors in identification, especially for less common species or images of poor quality.
  • Limited Offline Features
    The app may lack robust offline capabilities, limiting its use in fieldwork situations where immediate internet access is not available.
  • Dependence on Image Quality
    The identification accuracy highly depends on the quality and clarity of the images submitted, requiring users to provide clear and detailed photographs.
  • Not a Comprehensive Guide
    While it is a useful tool for initial identification, Pl@ntNet is not a substitute for expert botanical knowledge and should be supplemented with professional advice for precise identification.

Analysis of fd

Overall verdict

  • Yes, fd (github.com) is generally considered good, particularly for its speed, ease of use, and modern features that enhance productivity over the traditional 'find' command.

Why this product is good

  • fd is a program for users who need a fast and user-friendly alternative to the traditional 'find' command. It provides a simple syntax, speed improvements by parallelizing search processes, ignores hidden files and directories by default, and offers colorized outputs, making it more intuitive and efficient for everyday use.

Recommended for

    fd is recommended for developers, system administrators, and power users who often search through directories and require a fast, efficient tool with a shorter learning curve.

fd videos

+ Add

Discmania FD (Fairway Driver) Golf Disc Review

More videos:

  • Review - Honda Civic FD | Review & Tips If you want to own one
  • Review - Regular Car Reviews: 1993 Mazda RX-7 FD

Pl@ntNet videos

+ Add

Pl@ntNet - Plant Identification App Preview

More videos:

  • Review - Plant Identification Apps (Pl@ntnet, Plantsnap, etc.) | Bushcraft Bullsh*t (Ep 2):
  • Review - Démo Pl@ntNet

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to fd and Pl@ntNet)

fd

Pl@ntNet

Productivity
100 100%
Productivity
0% 0
Online Services
0 0%
Online Services
100% 100
Note Taking
100 100%
Note Taking
0% 0
Tool
0 0%
Tool
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using fd and Pl@ntNet. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, fd seems to be a lot more popular than Pl@ntNet. While we know about 126 links to fd, we've tracked only 4 mentions of Pl@ntNet. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

fd mentions (126)

View more

Pl@ntNet mentions (4)

  • What kind of tree is this? I've had two in my backyard for 20 years and never knew what they were called. (Multiple photos, Houston TX)
    There are a number of phone apps that will identify trees from a picture. I personally prefer plantnet.org (non-profit entity / no ads or tracking). Source: over 3 years ago
  • Could Someone Help Me Identify This Tree; is it Even a Tree?
    You can also go directly to plantnet.org and perform the same check. Source: over 3 years ago
  • Tree book for Europe
    Get the app from plantnet.org. It's developed by a non-profit consortium of European organizations. I promise it's completely ad free and won't terrorize you in any way. Source: over 3 years ago
  • Trees Image Dataset
    You could scrape them off the plantnet.org site. But unless your problem is purely academic you could skip creating your own engine and just use their API. Source: almost 4 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing fd and Pl@ntNet, you can also consider the following products

Bat - A cat(1) clone with wings.

Gardenia - Gardenia is the new gardening application in the town!

fzf - A command-line fuzzy finder written in Go

Garden Answers - Garden Answers is an online plant identification application that allows you to get detailed information about any plants or flowers in your garden.

The Silver Searcher - A code searching tool similar to ack, with a focus on speed.

iNaturalist - iNaturalist is known as one of the most popular nature applications that helps you to identify the animals, plants, insects, and lots of other things with just a single click.

Loading...