Software Alternatives & Startups
Register | Login

fd VS Opal.so

Compare fd VS Opal.so and see what are their differences

fd

A simple, fast and user-friendly alternative to 'find'.

Rating
0 reviews
Pricing
Open source
Alternatives Is it good?
Opal.so

Real Focus in Real-Time. Measure and improve your focus day by day, on iPhone, iPad and macOS.

No screenshot yet
Rating
0 reviews
Alternatives Is it good?
Grapple
Do-It-Yourself Data Analytics & Business Intelligence, Powered by AI sponsored
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Which is more popular?

Based on our record, fd seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 130 times since March 2021.

social mentions
130 vs 0
Productivity popularity
41% vs 59%
alternatives listed
72 vs 141

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

fd
Opal.so
Website github.com opal.so
Pricing
Open source
Official pricing
Company Startup from Germany —
Listed in
Terminal Tools Developer Tools API Tools Linux +1
Focus Productivity Time Tracking Time Management +1

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

fd 6 features
Opal.so 0 features
  • Speed
    fd is optimized for speed and can outperform traditional tools like find due to its use of parallelism and optimized algorithms.
  • Ease of Use
    fd has a simpler and more user-friendly syntax compared to find, making it easier to learn and use.
  • Colorized Output
    fd provides colorized output by default, making it easier to differentiate between file types and enhancing readability.
  • Smart Case
    fd enables smart case detection by default, meaning searches are case-insensitive unless the pattern includes an uppercase letter.
  • Defaults to Ignoring Hidden Files
    By default, fd ignores hidden files and directories, as well as files specified in .gitignore, helping to narrow down search results to relevant files.
  • Cross-Platform Support
    fd supports multiple platforms including Linux, macOS, and Windows, making it versatile for different development environments.

Possible disadvantages

  • Dependency on Rust
    fd requires the Rust toolchain to build, which may be inconvenient for environments where installing additional dependencies is restricted.
  • Limited to Modern Features
    fd may not support some legacy systems and older versions of operating systems, limiting its applicability in certain scenarios.
  • Not as Feature-Rich
    While fd is easier to use, it doesn't have all the advanced features and fine-grained control options that find offers.
  • Compatibility
    fd’s simplified syntax and modern features may not be directly compatible with scripts or workflows that depend on find, requiring adjustments for integration.

No features have been listed yet.

Analysis

An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.

fd
Opal.so

Overall verdict

  • Yes, fd (github.com) is generally considered good, particularly for its speed, ease of use, and modern features that enhance productivity over the traditional 'find' command.

Why this product is good

  • fd is a program for users who need a fast and user-friendly alternative to the traditional 'find' command. It provides a simple syntax, speed improvements by parallelizing search processes, ignores hidden files and directories by default, and offers colorized outputs, making it more intuitive and efficient for everyday use.

Recommended for

    fd is recommended for developers, system administrators, and power users who often search through directories and require a fast, efficient tool with a shorter learning curve.

No analysis of Opal.so yet.

Videos

Walkthroughs and reviews on video.

fd 3 videos + Add
Opal.so 0 videos + Add

Discmania FD (Fairway Driver) Golf Disc Review

More videos

  • - Honda Civic FD | Review & Tips If you want to own one
  • - Regular Car Reviews: 1993 Mazda RX-7 FD

No Opal.so videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
fd
Opal.so
41% 41%
Productivity
59% 59%
100% 100%
Note Taking
0% 0%
0% 0%
Focus
100% 100%
100% 100%
Terminal Tools
0% 0%

User comments

Share your experience with using fd and Opal.so. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

fd 130 mentions
Opal.so 0 mentions
  • I Replaced a 461-Million-Downloads-a-Month Glob Package With One Rust File
    Fast-glob was the Package Killer target, but it was not the only comparison worth making. Developers often reach for fd or ripgrep when they need to locate files from a terminal. They are mature native tools with excellent defaults, so... - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago
  • I wrote an bash enumerator because I was sick of xargs
    > Find works, but the syntax is arcane. Fd is a lifesaver: https://github.com/sharkdp/fd. - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago
  • Biff is a command line datetime Swiss army knife
    I know that if you want `fd` (https://github.com/sharkdp/fd) you need to `apt install fd-find` and which installs the binary `fdfind` (!). - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago

View more

Tracking Opal.so since May 2025.

Alternatives to fd and Opal.so

When comparing fd and Opal.so, you can also consider the following products.

Loading...