Facebook Design VS PostSharp

• Resource Rich
  Facebook Design offers a wealth of resources including design guidelines, toolkits, and case studies which can be invaluable for designers seeking to learn and apply best practices.
• Professional Insights
  The platform shares insights and articles from professionals within Facebook’s design team, providing unique perspectives and advanced knowledge from experienced practitioners.
• Inspirational Showcase
  The site showcases diverse, real-world projects that can inspire designers and provide ideas for their own creative processes.
• Community Engagement
  Facebook Design hosts events and workshops, enabling designers to connect, collaborate, and engage with a larger community.

Possible disadvantages

• Corporate Bias
  The content might be biased towards promoting Facebook’s own design system and methodologies, which may not always be applicable or preferable for all designers.
• High-Level Content
  Some of the material and case studies may be too advanced for beginners who might find it challenging to translate these into practical applications.
• Limited Accessibility
  Certain resources, events, or tools might have limited accessibility due to geographic or sign-up restrictions.
• User Interface Complexity
  The website’s layout can sometimes be overwhelming for new users, potentially making navigation and resource discovery more difficult.

• Aspect-Oriented Programming (AOP)
  PostSharp allows developers to implement AOP in .NET projects, which helps in separating cross-cutting concerns like logging, error handling, or validation, making the code cleaner and easier to maintain.
• Code Reusability
  By using aspects, developers can write code that can be easily reused across different parts of an application, reducing redundancy and improving efficiency.
• Maintainability
  PostSharp helps to create a more modular codebase. With cross-cutting concerns handled separately, it becomes easier to manage and modify without affecting the core business logic.
• Performance
  PostSharp weaves aspects into compiled code at build time, which generally leads to better runtime performance compared to other AOP approaches that might involve reflection or dynamic proxies.
• Rich Library of Aspects
  It provides a comprehensive library of pre-built aspects like caching, threading, and security, which can accelerate development by reducing the need to implement common functionalities from scratch.

Possible disadvantages

• Learning Curve
  For developers unfamiliar with AOP, there might be a steep learning curve to understand and effectively leverage PostSharp's capabilities.
• Debugging Complexity
  The abstraction layer introduced by aspects can make debugging more challenging as it might not be immediately clear where certain behaviors or errors originate from.
• Cost
  PostSharp is a commercial product with licensing fees, which might be a concern for small projects or organizations with limited budgets.
• Build Time Overhead
  The process of weaving aspects into the code can increase the time taken for builds, which might be noticeable and frustrating for very large projects.
• Vendor Lock-in
  Relying heavily on PostSharp-specific features might lead to challenges if there's a need to switch to a different AOP framework or if PostSharp's development ceases.

No Facebook Design videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Aspect Oriented Programming with PostSharp | Pluralsight

More videos