Exstats VS ClientForms.app

ClientForms.app's answer:

Frontend: Next.js 15 (React 19), Tailwind CSS Backend: Supabase (PostgreSQL, Row-Level Security) Authentication: Clerk Payments: Stripe Hosting: Vercel (Sydney region) Database hosting: Supabase (Australian data residency)

Exstats's answer

Exstats is built for the people shipping and growing browser extensions.

The core audience is independent extension developers and small product teams who need one place to watch installs, ratings, reviews, and keyword rank for their extensions, on whichever stores they publish to.

A second audience is extension growth and marketing specialists who track competitor launches, rating shifts, and category trends on behalf of clients and need a single view across Chrome, Edge, and Firefox rather than three separate workflows.

A third audience is product and engineering teams at companies whose extension is a meaningful acquisition or retention surface, who need daily alerts, exportable data, and API access for internal dashboards.

ClientForms.app's answer:

Psychologists who assess ADHD and autism. Typically private practice, solo or small group (1-5 clinicians), currently using paper forms and spending hours on admin per assessment. They want something that works and is secure.

Exstats's answer

Exstats treats an extension as one product across stores, not as three separate listings on three sites. The Chrome, Edge, and Firefox versions sit in one row, and history, reviews, alerts, and competitor data flow from there.

ClientForms.app's answer:

Neurodivergent-first design. Most digital forms just replicate paper online. ClientForms is built specifically for ADHD and autism patients - progress bars with time remaining (helps with time blindness), softer colours instead of harsh white, sticky headers so you always know where you are. The forms are designed to reduce anxiety and improve completion rates.

Exstats's answer

Unified multi-browser view. Exstats is the only dashboard that groups the Chrome, Edge, and Firefox versions of an extension into one product, with shared history and shared alerts. Most analytics tools cover only the Chrome Web Store, or split the three stores across separate sites.

Full year of daily history. Stores show current numbers and a short trail. Exstats keeps daily snapshots for up to a year so weekly and monthly trends, rating regressions, and competitor launches are visible at a glance.

Reviews from every store in one table. Chrome, Edge, and Firefox reviews sit in one sortable, filterable table, so a developer can read a week of feedback without rotating between three dashboards.

Keyword tracking with AI suggestions. Search rank is tracked per store with daily change indicators, and the keyword tool suggests new keywords from competitor listings rather than expecting the developer to bring a complete list.

ClientForms.app's answer:

Most clinical software treats patients as an afterthought. ClientForms is designed specifically for neurodivergent users who are filling out the forms, progress indicators, time estimates, calmer colours, predictable layouts. One link, no signup required, works on any device. Patients just open and complete.

Exstats's answer

Exstats started because developers shipping browser extensions kept running into the same wall. The Chrome Web Store, Edge Add-ons, and Firefox Add-ons each give publishers a siloed view with short history, no competitor data, and no way to compare a release against a rival over time. Teams that maintained extensions on more than one store ended up checking three dashboards a day and keeping competitor numbers in spreadsheets. We built Exstats so an extension and its store versions live in one place, with daily history, alerts, and competitor tracking built in.