Software Alternatives & Startups

Exposed VS Ebean ORM

Compare Exposed VS Ebean ORM and see what are their differences

Exposed

Exposed is a Kotlin SQL library providing a typesafe DSL for constructing queries and a lightweight DAO framework for database interaction in ORM style.

No screenshot yet
Rating
0 reviews
Ebean ORM

ORM for Java / Kotlin

Rating
0 reviews
Pricing
Open source

Which is more popular?

Based on our record, Ebean ORM seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 4 times since March 2021.

social mentions
0 vs 4
Web Frameworks popularity
21% vs 79%
alternatives listed
13 vs 31

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

E
Exposed
Ebean ORM
Website jetbrains.com ebean.io
Pricing —
Open source
Listed in

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

E
Exposed 5 features
Ebean ORM 5 features
  • Kotlin-idiomatic API
    Exposed is written in Kotlin and offers a type-safe DSL and a DAO API that feel natural to Kotlin developers. Queries are checked at compile time, which reduces runtime errors compared to raw SQL strings.
  • Two flexible abstraction levels
    Developers can choose between the lightweight SQL DSL, which stays close to SQL, and the DAO API, which maps tables to entities. Both can be mixed in the same project, so teams can pick the right level of abstraction for each use case.
  • Multi-database support
    Exposed supports many relational databases, including H2, MySQL, MariaDB, PostgreSQL, Oracle, and SQL Server (SQLite is also supported). Switching databases or supporting several of them requires few code changes.
  • Lightweight with low learning curve
    Compared to heavyweight ORMs such as Hibernate, Exposed has a small footprint and less hidden magic like lazy-loading proxies or complex session management. Its behavior is easier to reason about, and setup is simple.
  • Good ecosystem integration and backing
    It is developed and maintained by JetBrains and integrates well with Ktor, Spring, and Kotlin coroutines (including R2DBC support in newer versions). It also supports Kotlin features like date-time types, JSON columns, and encryption through extension modules.

Possible disadvantages

  • Kotlin/JVM only
    Exposed can only be used with Kotlin on the JVM, so it is not an option for Java-only teams that don't want to adopt Kotlin, and it can't be shared across non-JVM platforms.
  • Limited advanced ORM features
    Compared to mature ORMs such as Hibernate, Exposed has fewer features such as sophisticated caching, complex inheritance mapping, and automatic change tracking. Complex relationships may need manual handling.
  • Basic schema migration support
    Exposed can create and alter tables, but its built-in migration tooling is limited and not a full replacement for tools like Flyway or Liquibase. Production projects typically need to add a dedicated migration tool.
  • Pre-1.0 API changes and smaller community
    For a long time Exposed was versioned below 1.0, with breaking changes between releases. Its community, tutorials, and third-party resources are smaller than for Hibernate or jOOQ, so finding answers for edge cases can be harder.
  • Concurrency and performance pitfalls
    Exposed is built on JDBC, which is blocking, so using it with coroutines requires care with transactions and dispatchers. The DAO layer can also produce N+1 query problems unless eager loading is used explicitly.
  • Simplified ORM
    Ebean ORM simplifies database interactions with an easy-to-use API, which abstracts away much of the complexity involved in handling SQL directly. This allows developers to focus more on business logic rather than database connectivity and queries.
  • Automatic Query Generation
    Ebean automatically generates queries based on the defined entity models, reducing the need for manually crafting complex SQL queries. This feature can save development time and reduce the potential for query-related errors.
  • Lazy Loading Support
    Ebean supports lazy loading, which allows for the efficient retrieval of data by only loading related entities when they are accessed. This can help improve application performance by reducing initial data loading times.
  • Integration with Play Framework
    Ebean integrates seamlessly with the Play Framework, which is advantageous if you are developing applications using this framework, providing a cohesive development experience and reducing setup complexity.
  • Full-text Search
    Ebean provides built-in support for full-text search, enabling applications to perform search operations without relying on external search services, thus offering more versatility in how data can be queried and manipulated.

Possible disadvantages

  • Limited Ecosystem
    Compared to more established ORMs like Hibernate, Ebean has a smaller community and ecosystem, which may result in less third-party support, fewer tutorials, and less available expertise, potentially increasing the learning curve for new developers.
  • Documentation
    While Ebean offers documentation, some users might find it lacking in depth compared to larger projects, which can make troubleshooting and advanced use cases more challenging to navigate without external help or experimentation.
  • Resource Intensive
    Ebean can be resource-intensive in terms of memory and processing, especially in cases of complex data models or when dealing with extremely large datasets, which might impact application performance and scalability.
  • Lack of Advanced Features
    For highly specialized and advanced ORM tasks, Ebean might lack some of the features offered by more mature ORMs like Hibernate, which could necessitate additional work or integration with other tools for complex requirements.

Videos

Walkthroughs and reviews on video.

E
Exposed 0 videos + Add
Ebean ORM 1 video + Add

No Exposed videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Ebean ORM - fetch join @OneToMany maxRows treatment

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
E
Exposed
Ebean ORM
21% 21%
79% 79%
21% 21%
79% 79%
55% 55%
45% 45%
0% 0%
100% 100%

User comments

Share your experience with using Exposed and Ebean ORM. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

E
Exposed 0 mentions
Ebean ORM 4 mentions

Tracking Exposed since Oct 2026.

  • How do you guys go about the persistence layer?
    You can have a look at https://ebean.io/ ... Better control over the generated SQL, multiple levels of abstraction, can generate DB migrations and run the DB migrations, transparent encryption support, SQL 2011 history support, test... Source: over 4 years ago
  • What do you whish for Spring 6?
    There is https://ebean.io/ and looks like it a community driven alternative to jOOQ. Source: about 5 years ago
  • Do you use code generators in your IDEs or some external ones? If so, which ones?
    Ebean ORM https://ebean.io/ was built to somewhat rival JPA (and JDBI) Btw: you can use java 16 records with ebean as DTOs, EmbeddedId and also as read only entity beans (and JPA implementations could similarly do so). Source: about 5 years ago

View more

Alternatives to Exposed and Ebean ORM

When comparing Exposed and Ebean ORM, you can also consider the following products.