Software Alternatives & Startups

Explorer++ VS BrightExplorer

Compare Explorer++ VS BrightExplorer and see what are their differences

Explorer++

Explorer++ is a free and open source file manager for Windows that can replace the functionality of Windows' native File Explorer. It can even be set to be the default file manager. Read more about Explorer++.

Rating
0 reviews
Pricing
Open source
BrightExplorer

Add a tabbed interface to Windows Explorer.

Rating
0 reviews

Which is more popular?

Based on our record, Explorer++ seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 13 times since March 2021.

social mentions
13 vs 0
File Manager popularity
81% vs 19%
alternatives listed
83 vs 28

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

Explorer++
BrightExplorer
Website explorerplusplus.com brightnewworlds.com
Pricing
Open source
—
Listed in

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

Explorer++ 5 features
BrightExplorer 4 features
  • User-Friendly Interface
    Explorer++ offers a clean and intuitive interface, making it easy for users to navigate and manage files efficiently.
  • Portability
    The software does not require installation, allowing users to run it from a USB drive and maintain settings across different machines.
  • Tabbed Browsing
    It supports tabbed browsing, enabling users to open multiple directories in a single window and switch between them easily.
  • Customizability
    Explorer++ offers customization options such as custom keyboard shortcuts and interface adjustments to fit user preferences.
  • Advanced Features
    The program provides features like file merging, splitting, and checksum calculation, which are useful for power users.

Possible disadvantages

  • Limited Support for Extensions
    Explorer++ has limited support for extensions and plugins, which may limit its functionality compared to other file managers with broader plugin ecosystems.
  • Windows-Only
    As a Windows-exclusive application, it does not support other operating systems, limiting its accessibility for non-Windows users.
  • Occasional Stability Issues
    Some users report occasional crashes or stability issues, which can disrupt file management tasks.
  • Lack of Regular Updates
    The frequency of updates is relatively low, meaning some users may encounter outdated features or unresolved bugs over time.
  • Limited Built-in Network Features
    It offers limited support for network-related tasks, which can be a drawback for users managing files across networked environments.
  • Tab-based Navigation
    BrightExplorer allows users to open multiple tabs within Windows Explorer, improving efficiency and organization when managing multiple folders.
  • User-friendly Interface
    The software integrates smoothly with the existing Windows environment, making it easy to use for those already familiar with Windows Explorer.
  • Customization Options
    BrightExplorer offers a range of customization options, allowing users to tailor the interface to their personal preferences.
  • Free Basic Version
    The basic version of BrightExplorer is available for free, making it accessible to users who want enhanced functionality without a financial commitment.

Possible disadvantages

  • Limited Feature Set in Free Version
    Some advanced features may only be available in the paid version, limiting the utility of the free version for power users.
  • Potential System Compatibility Issues
    Some users have reported issues with BrightExplorer compatibility on certain versions of Windows, potentially limiting its usability.
  • Resource Usage
    BrightExplorer may increase CPU and memory usage due to its additional features, particularly on older systems.
  • Lack of Updates
    There may be fewer updates and new features compared to other file management tools, potentially impacting long-term viability and support.

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
Explorer++
BrightExplorer
81% 81%
19% 19%
100% 100%
0% 0%
0% 0%
100% 100%
100% 100%
0% 0%

User comments

Share your experience with using Explorer++ and BrightExplorer. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Reviews and articles

External articles and on-site reviews we used to compare the two products.

Explorer++ no reviews yet
BrightExplorer no reviews yet

We have no reviews of BrightExplorer yet. Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

Explorer++ 13 mentions
BrightExplorer 0 mentions
  • Chainloading Clover/OC from Windows Boot Manager?
    And hence this question, how do I chainload the Clover/OC EFI file from the Windows Boot Manager menu? No way that I know of, you need to use another bootloader first, OC/Clover must come first. (Adding OpenCore via BCDEdit has always... Source: over 3 years ago
  • Sigma File Manager v1.6 is released to Microsoft Store, Winget, and Github. Ask me anything!
    Just a heads up, I currently use Explorer++ to do this function for my role at work. TBH that app is pretty ancient compared to this new file manager but it works for my purposes. Source: over 3 years ago
  • Windows 10 new ADMX files
    Launch a 3rd party file explorer (or cmd) as TrustedInstaller and you will be able to replace/modify the templates. Source: almost 4 years ago

View more

Tracking BrightExplorer since Mar 2021.

Alternatives to Explorer++ and BrightExplorer

When comparing Explorer++ and BrightExplorer, you can also consider the following products.