Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

ErrorFeed VS Errorception

Compare ErrorFeed VS Errorception and see what are their differences

ErrorFeed logo ErrorFeed

Error tracking and exception handling for developers, startups, and freelancers.

Errorception logo Errorception

Painless JavaScript Error Tracking
  • ErrorFeed Landing page
    Landing page //
    2018-09-30
  • Errorception Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-10-15

ErrorFeed features and specs

  • Real-time Monitoring
    ErrorFeed offers real-time error tracking, allowing developers to quickly identify and address issues as they occur, which helps in minimizing downtime and maintaining performance.
  • User-friendly Interface
    The platform provides an intuitive and easy-to-navigate interface, making it accessible for both technical and non-technical users to monitor errors effectively.
  • Comprehensive Error Reports
    ErrorFeed generates detailed error reports that include stack traces, error frequency, and impact analysis, which support thorough debugging processes.
  • Integration Capabilities
    The service integrates well with a variety of third-party applications and development environments, enhancing its utility across different platforms and workflows.
  • Customizable Notifications
    Users can customize notification settings to receive alerts via email, SMS, or chat applications, ensuring they stay updated on critical issues in a manner that suits their workflow.

Possible disadvantages of ErrorFeed

  • Cost
    For smaller teams or projects, the cost of a subscription to ErrorFeed might be prohibitive, especially when only basic functionality is needed.
  • Steep Learning Curve
    While the interface is user-friendly, taking full advantage of all its features might require a learning period, which could slow down team onboarding.
  • Limited Free Tier
    The free tier offered by ErrorFeed is limited in terms of features and capacity, possibly requiring an upgrade to a paid plan for adequate functionality in larger projects.
  • Dependency on Internet Connectivity
    Being a cloud-based tool, ErrorFeed requires a stable internet connection, which might be a limitation in areas with unreliable network infrastructure.
  • Potential for Overwhelming Alerts
    Without proper configuration, users might receive an overwhelming number of alerts, which can lead to important issues being overlooked amidst less critical notifications.

Errorception features and specs

  • Real-Time Error Monitoring
    Errorception provides real-time monitoring of JavaScript errors, allowing developers to detect and address issues as they occur, minimizing downtime and improving user experience.
  • Lightweight and Easy Integration
    The platform offers a simple setup process and a lightweight client-side library, which can be easily integrated into existing projects with minimal overhead.
  • Detailed Error Reports
    Errorception provides detailed error reports with stack traces, user information, and environment details, helping developers quickly understand and fix issues.
  • Email Notifications
    Developers can receive email notifications for new errors, ensuring they are promptly informed about any issues affecting their applications.
  • Browser and OS Detection
    The platform can detect and report the browser and operating system of users experiencing errors, aiding in identifying environment-specific issues.

Possible disadvantages of Errorception

  • Limited to JavaScript Errors
    Errorception is focused specifically on JavaScript errors, which means it doesn't provide monitoring or insights into server-side issues or errors in other programming languages.
  • Dependency on Client-Side Library
    The service requires embedding a client-side library in the application, which could be a concern for projects aiming to minimize third-party dependencies or potential security vulnerabilities.
  • Scalability Concerns
    For large-scale applications with significant user traffic, there could be concerns regarding the scalability of error monitoring and reporting through Errorception.
  • Cost
    Depending on the plan and the scale of usage, the cost of using Errorception could be a consideration, particularly for startups or small businesses with limited budgets.
  • Customization Limitations
    Some users may find the customization options for filtering and managing errors limited compared to more robust error tracking platforms.

ErrorFeed videos

No ErrorFeed videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Errorception videos

errorception.com: Painless client-side JavaScript Error Tracking -Rakesh Pai

More videos:

  • Review - Architecture of Errorception by Rakesh Pai

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to ErrorFeed and Errorception)
Error Tracking
30 30%
70% 70
Exception Monitoring
40 40%
60% 60
Crash Reporting
100 100%
0% 0
Bug Trackers
41 41%
59% 59

User comments

Share your experience with using ErrorFeed and Errorception. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

What are some alternatives?

When comparing ErrorFeed and Errorception, you can also consider the following products

Errsole - Collect, store, and visualize logs with a single module

TrackJS JavaScript Error Logging - JavaScript Error Monitoring from TrackJS gives you context about what's happening in your end-users' browsers.

AirBrake - Airbrake is the leading exception reporting service, currently providing error tracking.

Rollbar - Rollbar collects errors that happen in your application, notifies you, and analyzes them so you can debug and fix them. Ruby, Python, PHP, Node.js, JavaScript, and Flash libraries available.

Sentry.io - From error tracking to performance monitoring, developers can see what actually matters, solve quicker, and learn continuously about their applications - from the frontend to the backend.

CatchJS - Unbloated, yet feature rich. CatchJS provides JavaScript Error Tracking the way it should be.