Software Alternatives & Startups

Epom VS stackprof

Compare Epom VS stackprof and see what are their differences

Epom

An ad serving solution for publishers, advertisers, ad and affiliate networks

Rating
0 reviews
stackprof

stackprof is a a sampling call-stack profiler for ruby 2.1+

Rating
0 reviews
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Which is more popular?

Based on our record, stackprof should be more popular than Epom. It has been mentioned 3 times since March 2021.

social mentions
1 vs 3
Advertising popularity
100% vs 0%
alternatives listed
160 vs 15

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

Epom
stackprof
Website epom.com github.com
Pricing —
Company Startup from Ukraine · 50 - 99 employees —
Listed in

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

Epom 5 features
stackprof 0 features
  • User-Friendly Interface
    Epom offers a clean, intuitive, and easy-to-navigate interface, making it approachable for users of varying technical expertise.
  • Cross-Platform Support
    Epom supports multiple platforms including mobile, desktop, and video, allowing for a versatile ad campaign strategy.
  • Comprehensive Analytics
    The platform provides in-depth analytics and reporting tools to help users track performance metrics and optimize campaigns effectively.
  • Customization Options
    Epom allows for a high degree of customization, enabling users to tailor their ad campaigns to meet specific needs and objectives.
  • Integration Capabilities
    Epom integrates well with various third-party tools and services, which allows for a more streamlined workflow.

Possible disadvantages

  • Pricing
    The cost of using Epom can be high for small businesses or startups, making it less accessible for those with limited budgets.
  • Customer Support
    Some users have reported that customer support can be slow to respond, which can be an issue during critical times.
  • Learning Curve
    Despite its user-friendly interface, the extensive range of features and settings may require a bit of a learning curve for new users.
  • Limited Templates
    The template library could be more expansive, limiting the options for quickly setting up new ad campaigns.
  • No Free Version
    Epom does not offer a free version, which can be a deterrent for users who want to test the platform extensively before making a financial commitment.

No features have been listed yet.

Analysis

An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.

Epom
stackprof

No analysis of Epom yet.

Overall verdict

  • StackProf is a well-regarded, sampling-based profiler for Ruby that provides low-overhead, actionable insights into CPU, wall-clock, object allocation, and memory usage, making it a reliable choice for performance analysis in production and development.

Why this product is good

  • Low-overhead sampling profiler that is safe to run in many scenarios, including production, without significantly impacting performance
  • Supports multiple profiling modes including CPU time, wall-clock time, and object allocation, giving flexibility for different diagnostic needs
  • Produces detailed reports with call graphs and flamegraph output that make it easy to identify hotspots and bottlenecks
  • Well-maintained, widely adopted in the Ruby community, and integrates cleanly with tools like rack-mini-profiler and speedscope
  • Simple API that lets you profile specific code blocks or entire applications with minimal setup

Recommended for

  • Ruby developers needing to diagnose CPU or performance bottlenecks in their applications
  • Teams optimizing Rails applications for latency and throughput
  • Engineers profiling memory allocation and garbage collection pressure
  • Developers who want to generate flamegraphs for visual performance analysis
  • Anyone needing a lightweight profiler suitable for production sampling

Videos

Walkthroughs and reviews on video.

Epom 2 videos + Add
stackprof 0 videos + Add

EPOM Ad Server for Networks

More videos

  • - Epom Ad Server for Networks Promo

No stackprof videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
Epom
stackprof
100% 100%
0% 0%
0% 0%
100% 100%
100% 100%
0% 0%

User comments

Share your experience with using Epom and stackprof. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Reviews and articles

External articles and on-site reviews we used to compare the two products.

Epom no reviews yet
stackprof no reviews yet

We have no reviews of stackprof yet. Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

Epom 1 mention
stackprof 3 mentions
  • CPM, CPC, or CPA? Handy Cheat Sheet to Succeed with Traffic Deals for Beginners
    My personal platform recommendation: a tool with 800+ features, suitable for CPA networks. Source: over 4 years ago
  • A Trick For Reading Flamegraphs
    Stackprof can be used alone/by itself to generate flamegraphs for arbitrary Ruby code. - Source: dev.to / almost 4 years ago
  • Why do my requests take so much time to complete when View and ActiveRecord are finishing fast?
    I’d use something like stackprof ( https://github.com/tmm1/stackprof ) to see where the time is going. If you already have suspicions you can use it to get information about a specific method / few lines of Ruby but there’s also a rack... Source: over 4 years ago
  • Optimizing your tests in 5 steps
    Other profilers, such as stackprof, trace everything that’s happening by line. These types of profilers usually need some instrumentation to be configured, as shown below:. - Source: dev.to / over 4 years ago

Alternatives to Epom and stackprof

When comparing Epom and stackprof, you can also consider the following products.