Enzyme VS Scratch
Compare Enzyme VS Scratch and see what are their differences
Changelog software that turns GitHub commits into release notes your users actually see — inside your app. Built for founders and teams who ship fast.
sponsored
Enzyme
Ava
Jasmine
react-testing-library
Chai
Karma
QUnit
EyeJS
Scratch
Code.org
Godot Engine
GDevelop
Invent With Python
Snap
Processing
Unity
Enzyme is recommended for developers who are working on React applications and prefer a testing library that provides a more detailed inspection of component internals, or for those maintaining legacy codebases that already rely on Enzyme. If you value testing that emphasizes implementation details, Enzyme can be a good choice.
Based on our record, Scratch seems to be a lot more popular than Enzyme. While we know about 578 links to Scratch, we've tracked only 3 mentions of Enzyme. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
Enzyme is a widely-used testing utility that provides robust tools for interacting with and inspecting React components. Its API supports shallow, full, and static rendering, enabling developers to test components in isolation or with their child components. Enzyme also allows testing lifecycle methods, making it ideal for applications with complex state and props interactions. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
Like many other companies with mature software, we found ourselves at a crossroads with our React application. The app, initially developed in early 2019, was built with React 16 and used Enzyme for unit testing. Over the past five years, the app grew, evolved, gained new features, and went though minor and major refactorings. Obviously, as responsible engineers we always maintained unit test coverage around... - Source: dev.to / almost 2 years ago
React testing library instead of enzyme for testing react UIs. I'll never go back. Source: over 4 years ago
What I wonder is: why has nobody noticed that code editors lack a concept of 0? When you're writing code, you can express any concept except that of an unfilled hole. We've rearranged every part of the coding process in a twisted-up way, all for the lack of a way to express lack. If you want to be more clear about what I mean, look to tools which can express holes like https://scratch.mit.edu and https://hazel.org. - Source: Hacker News / 12 days ago
Sounds like Scratch: https://scratch.mit.edu/. - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago
The average house in the UK now has 1.3 laptops. https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2015/apr/09/online-all-the-time-average-british-household-owns-74-internet-devices A windows laptop from today is vastly easier to code on that a C64 or whatever. Most houses would have an internet connection as well so they can get to all sorts of things. A Raspberry Pi is probably something richer kids get to play with. Have... - Source: Hacker News / 4 months ago
No syntax error editing seems like https://scratch.mit.edu/. - Source: Hacker News / 6 months ago
My 2c from lots of remote math tutoring, and one coding-for-fun middle school student: - student motivation is everything. Hard to motivate thru a screen and with cameras off. Hard to keep them engaged or recognize if they're engaged. Less of an issue with adult students. - reduce friction for students as much as possible. Ideally one web tool, zero installs. Prefer tools with few failure modes, and have fallbacks... - Source: Hacker News / 7 months ago
Ava - Making conversations accessible for the deaf
Code.org - Code.org is a non-profit whose goal is to expose all students to computer programming.
Jasmine - Behavior-Driven JavaScript
Godot Engine - Feature-packed 2D and 3D open source game engine.
react-testing-library - [`React Testing Library`][gh] builds on top of `DOM Testing Library` by adding
GDevelop - GDevelop is an open-source game making software designed to be used by everyone.