Software Alternatives & Startups

Enhanced GitHub VS acme.sh

Compare Enhanced GitHub VS acme.sh and see what are their differences

Enhanced GitHub

:rocket: Chrome extension to display size of each file, download link and copy file contents directly to clipboard - softvar/enhanced-github

Rating
0 reviews
acme.sh

A pure Unix shell script implementing ACME client protocol and deploying SSL certificates.

Rating
0 reviews

Which is more popular?

Based on our record, acme.sh seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 43 times since March 2021.

social mentions
0 vs 43
Software Development popularity
37% vs 63%
alternatives listed
13 vs 27

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

Enhanced GitHub
acme.sh
Website github.com github.com
Listed in

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

Enhanced GitHub 4 features
acme.sh 6 features
  • File Download
    Enhanced GitHub provides a direct download button for each file in a repository, which simplifies the process of obtaining files without needing to clone the entire repository.
  • Repo Size
    It displays the total size of the repository, which is not available in the default GitHub interface, helping users make informed decisions about cloning or downloading repositories.
  • Link to Release Downloads
    The tool provides quick access links to release downloads directly from the repository page, saving users time navigating through release sections.
  • Clone Speed Enhancement
    It offers estimated clone speeds based on your connection, improving user understanding of how long a repository might take to clone.

Possible disadvantages

  • Browser Compatibility
    Enhanced GitHub might not be compatible with all browsers as it primarily functions as a browser extension, limiting its accessibility.
  • Security Concerns
    As a third-party tool, there could be concerns regarding data security and privacy, since it requires permissions to access GitHub content.
  • Maintenance
    The project might not be regularly maintained or updated for new GitHub features or changes, which could lead to issues or reduced functionality.
  • Limited Scope
    While enhancing certain aspects of GitHub, the tool does not cover all potential improvements, limiting its usefulness to its specific features.
  • Ease of Use
    acme.sh is simple to install and use because it is written in shell script. It does not require any external dependencies, which makes it lightweight and easy to set up.
  • Wide Platform Support
    The script is compatible with multiple operating systems, including Linux, macOS, and Windows (via WSL), which makes it versatile for different environments.
  • Supports Various DNS Providers
    acme.sh supports many DNS APIs out of the box, allowing users to automate DNS challenges with their preferred provider easily.
  • Automatic Renewal
    acme.sh can automatically renew certificates and deploy them, ensuring uninterrupted HTTPS service without manual intervention.
  • Customizable and Extendable
    Because it is a simple script, users can easily customize and extend its functionality to suit their specific needs.
  • No Root Necessary
    acme.sh does not require root access for installation and operation, improving security since it can be run without elevated privileges.

Possible disadvantages

  • Limited GUI
    Since acme.sh is a command-line tool, those accustomed to graphical interfaces might find it less intuitive to manage, compared to web-based interfaces.
  • Learning Curve
    Though it is easy to use for those familiar with the command line, users new to the terminal may face a learning curve when first using acme.sh.
  • Community Support
    While there is a community that supports acme.sh, the support might not be as extensive or swift as commercial solutions, potentially leading to delays in troubleshooting.
  • Misconfiguration Risks
    Because the installation and configuration are done manually, there is a risk of errors or misconfiguration, especially for users unfamiliar with SSL/TLS certificates.

Videos

Walkthroughs and reviews on video.

Enhanced GitHub 0 videos + Add
acme.sh 1 video + Add

No Enhanced GitHub videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Free SSL Let's Encrypt - Acme.sh - Wordpress - Openlitespeed

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
Enhanced GitHub
acme.sh
37% 37%
63% 63%
100% 100%
0% 0%
0% 0%
100% 100%
100% 100%
0% 0%

User comments

Share your experience with using Enhanced GitHub and acme.sh. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

Enhanced GitHub 0 mentions
acme.sh 43 mentions

Tracking Enhanced GitHub since Mar 2021.

  • Let's Encrypt has been down most of today
    Acme.sh is maintained by ZeroSSL. https://github.com/acmesh-official/acme.sh#2%EF%B8%8F%E2%83%A32%EF%B8%8F%E2%83%A3-about-this-repository. - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago
  • SSL certificate requirements are becoming obnoxious
    Lots of ACME software supports configuring CA fallbacks, so even if a CA is down hard for an extended period you can issue certificates with the others. Using LetsEncrypt and ZeroSSL together is a popular approach. If you need a stronger... - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
  • I no longer have an old-school cert on my HTTPS site
    I was amazed by them having so much distrust of the various clients. Certbot is typically in the repositories for things like Debian/Ubuntu. My favourite client is probably - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago

View more

Alternatives to Enhanced GitHub and acme.sh

When comparing Enhanced GitHub and acme.sh, you can also consider the following products.