Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

emitter.io VS Buildah

Compare emitter.io VS Buildah and see what are their differences

emitter.io logo emitter.io

Real-time communication service for connecting online devices.

Buildah logo Buildah

Buildah is a web-based OCI container tool that allows you to manage the wide range of images in your OCI container and helps you to build the image container from the scratch.
  • emitter.io Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-04-26
  • Buildah Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-05-27

emitter.io features and specs

  • Scalability
    Emitter.io is designed to handle high loads and can be scaled up to accommodate increasing numbers of connections and messages.
  • Decentralization
    Emitter.io offers a decentralized, peer-to-peer architecture, which can improve reliability and decrease dependency on a single server or point of failure.
  • Real-time Communication
    The platform is optimized for real-time message delivery, catering to applications that require low-latency data exchanges.
  • Security Features
    Emitter.io includes built-in security features such as fine-grained access control with keys, ensuring that only authorized clients can subscribe or publish to channels.
  • Open Source
    Being open-source, Emitter.io allows developers to inspect, modify, and contribute to the source code, tailoring it to their specific needs.

Possible disadvantages of emitter.io

  • Complexity
    Setting up and managing a decentralized, real-time messaging system like Emitter.io may require substantial understanding and expertise in distributed systems.
  • Resource Intensive
    Running a decentralized architecture can be resource-intensive in terms of network bandwidth and CPU usage, especially when scaling to a large number of nodes.
  • Documentation
    The documentation may not be as comprehensive or regularly updated compared to other more established messaging platforms, potentially leading to a steeper learning curve for new users.
  • Limited Ecosystem
    Compared to some more mature platforms, Emitter.io might have a smaller ecosystem of plugins, libraries, and third-party services that can limit out-of-the-box functionality and integrations.

Buildah features and specs

  • Lightweight
    Buildah is a tool focused solely on building OCI and Docker-compatible containers, which makes it less resource-intensive compared to other container building solutions that include additional components like container runtimes.
  • Daemon-less
    Unlike Docker, Buildah does not require a running daemon, meaning it can be used in environments where a daemon is not desired or feasible, enhancing security and reducing footprint.
  • Flexibility
    Buildah provides flexibility by allowing precise control over container image creation, enabling advanced scenarios like building images from scratch, adding content at various stages, and using alternative base images.
  • Security
    Running without a daemon improves security by minimizing attack surfaces and permissions needed for building images, allowing for container creation and management by unprivileged users.
  • Integration with Podman
    Buildah integrates well with Podman, allowing users to manage containers and images without requiring additional integrations, as both are part of the same toolset for comprehensive container management.

Possible disadvantages of Buildah

  • Steep Learning Curve
    Users already familiar with Docker might find Buildahโ€™s command-line interface and functionality to be different, necessitating a learning curve to effectively utilize its capabilities.
  • Less Mature Ecosystem
    Compared to Docker, Buildah has a smaller community and fewer integrations with third-party tools or cloud platforms, potentially limiting its use in complex or niche scenarios.
  • Lack of Windows Support
    As of now, Buildah primarily supports Linux platforms, which can be a limitation for developers using or targeting Windows environments.
  • Limited GUI Tools
    Buildah primarily operates through a command-line interface, with fewer graphical user interface options available, which might not appeal to users who prefer visual management tools.
  • Documentation Gaps
    Although improving, Buildahโ€™s documentation can be less comprehensive and more challenging to navigate than Docker's, potentially making troubleshooting or advanced usage more difficult.

emitter.io videos

No emitter.io videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Buildah videos

How to Build a Container Image Using Buildah

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to emitter.io and Buildah)
Developer Tools
34 34%
66% 66
Cloud Computing
0 0%
100% 100
Mobile Push Messaging
100 100%
0% 0
Realtime Backend / API
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using emitter.io and Buildah. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Buildah seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 14 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

emitter.io mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of emitter.io yet. Tracking of emitter.io recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Buildah mentions (14)

  • Podman vs. Docker: Containerization Tools Comparison
    Modern Docker releases use BuildKit, an efficient builder developed by Docker, whereas Podman uses Red Hat's Buildah. However, both solutions output OCI-compliant images, so there's no practical difference between the two for standard build workflows. - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago
  • Dockerfmt: A Dockerfile Formatter
    I suspect that the GP was really asking "why not use a different tool", like buildah , buildpacks , nix ,. - Source: Hacker News / 6 months ago
  • Top 8 Docker Alternatives to Consider in 2025
    Buildah specializes in building OCI-compliant container images, offering a more granular and secure approach to image creation compared to traditional Dockerfile builds. - Source: dev.to / 9 months ago
  • How to Create a CI/CD Pipeline with Docker
    Lockdown your Dockerized build environments --- Because privileged mode is insecure, you should restrict your CI/CD environments to known users and projects. If this isn't feasible, then instead of using Docker, you could try using a standalone image builder like Buildah to eliminate the risk. Alternatively, configuring rootless Docker-in-Docker can mitigate some --- but not all --- of the security concerns... - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
  • Ko: Easy Go Containers
    In my experience, not using docker to build docker images is a good idea. E.g. buildah[0] with chroot isolation can build images in a GitLab pipeline, where docker would fail. It can still use the same Dockerfile though. If you want to get rid of your Dockerfiles anyway, nix can also build docker images[1] with all the added benefits of nix (reproducibility, efficient building and caching, automatic layering,... - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing emitter.io and Buildah, you can also consider the following products

Firebase - Firebase is a cloud service designed to power real-time, collaborative applications for mobile and web.

Podman - Simple debugging tool for pods and images

Supabase - An open source Firebase alternative

containerd - An industry-standard container runtime with an emphasis on simplicity, robustness and portability

Etebase - Etebase makes it easy to build end-to-end encrypted applications by taking care of the encryption and its related challenges.

BuildKit - BuildKit is an open-source toolkit manager application that allows you to build the artifacts in a minimum time frame and helps you to gather the garbage automatically.