Software Alternatives & Startups

ember.js VS TouchDevelop

Compare ember.js VS TouchDevelop and see what are their differences

ember.js

A JavaScript framework for creating ambitious web apps

Rating
0 reviews
Pricing
Open source
TouchDevelop

Program your devices directly from your devices with TouchDevelop! You do not need a separate PC.

No screenshot yet
Rating
0 reviews
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Which is more popular?

Based on our record, ember.js seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 37 times since March 2021.

social mentions
37 vs 0
Javascript UI Libraries popularity
100% vs 0%
alternatives listed
192 vs 11

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

ember.js
TouchDevelop
Website emberjs.com touchdevelop.com
Pricing
Open source
—
Listed in

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

ember.js 7 features
TouchDevelop 5 features
  • Convention Over Configuration
    Ember.js emphasizes conventions, which can help streamline the development process and reduce decision fatigue by providing out-of-the-box solutions and standardizing code structure.
  • Robust CLI
    Ember CLI is a powerful command-line tool that helps automate numerous development tasks, such as scaffolding, building, testing, and deploying applications, making the developer's workflow more efficient.
  • EMBER Data
    Ember Data is a robust library for handling data models and relationships. It simplifies the process of interacting with APIs and managing data, offering built-in support for RESTful APIs.
  • Strong Community and Ecosystem
    Ember.js has a strong and active community, which results in extensive documentation, numerous addons, and regular updates, enhancing the framework's reliability and feature set.
  • Two-Way Data Binding
    Ember.js supports two-way data binding, which helps keep the model and the view in sync automatically. This feature simplifies the management of user input and model updates.
  • Built-in Testing
    Ember.js has built-in testing support, making it easier to write and run tests for applications. This facilitates the development of robust, maintainable, and bug-free code.
  • Focused on Large Applications
    Ember.js is particularly well-suited for ambitious, large-scale applications due to its structure and built-in best practices, which promote maintainability and scalability.

Possible disadvantages

  • Steep Learning Curve
    Ember.js has a significant learning curve, particularly for developers who are new to its conventions and deep abstractions. This can be a barrier to entry for some.
  • Performance Overhead
    The comprehensive nature of Ember.js can lead to performance overhead, especially for smaller applications. The framework's rich feature set may be more than what is needed for simpler projects.
  • Less Flexibility
    The convention-over-configuration approach can reduce flexibility and make it harder to deviate from the prescribed way of doing things, which can be restrictive for developers who need more control.
  • Heavy Dependencies
    Ember.js applications can come with numerous dependencies, which can increase the bundle size and, subsequently, the load time of the application.
  • Slow to Adapt New Trends
    Being a mature framework, Ember.js can be slower to adopt the latest web development trends compared to newer frameworks, leading to potential lag in leveraging cutting-edge features.
  • Complexity in Customization
    While conventions can be beneficial, scenarios that require custom configurations can become complex and cumbersome, potentially complicating the development process.
  • Smaller Talent Pool
    Compared to more mainstream frameworks like React or Angular, there is a smaller pool of developers who are proficient in Ember.js, which can make hiring and collaboration more challenging.
  • Beginner-Friendly
    TouchDevelop provides a simplified programming environment that is accessible to beginners, making it easier for those with little to no coding experience to start developing applications.
  • Cross-Platform Development
    The platform allows users to create applications that can run on multiple operating systems like Windows, iOS, and Android, thus broadening the reach of the applications developed.
  • Cloud Integration
    TouchDevelop seamlessly integrates with cloud services, enabling users to store data and access various web services easily within their applications.
  • Mobile Friendly
    TouchDevelop can be used on mobile devices, allowing users to develop apps directly on their smartphones or tablets, which enhances portability and convenience.
  • Interactive Learning
    The interactive tutorial and help system guide users through the learning process, enhancing their understanding and making it easier to pick up programming concepts.

Possible disadvantages

  • Limited Advanced Features
    For more experienced developers, TouchDevelop lacks some advanced features and flexibility offered by more powerful development environments, limiting its usefulness for complex applications.
  • Discontinued Support
    TouchDevelop is no longer actively maintained by Microsoft, which means users might encounter issues or lack updates and support in the future.
  • Dependence on Internet Connection
    While it offers cloud integration, reliance on internet connectivity for some features can be a drawback in situations where access to the internet is limited or unavailable.
  • Platform-Specific Limitations
    Although it is designed for cross-platform compatibility, TouchDevelop may have some limitations or inconsistencies across different operating systems.
  • Limited Community and Resources
    As a niche tool with a smaller user base, finding community support, third-party tutorials, or comprehensive resources can be more challenging compared to popular platforms.

Analysis

An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.

ember.js
TouchDevelop

Overall verdict

  • Yes, Ember.js is considered a good choice for developing ambitious web applications, particularly when the project benefits from a strong structure and standardized patterns.

Why this product is good

  • Ember.js is a robust JavaScript framework known for its convention over configuration philosophy, which speeds up development by providing built-in best practices and tools. It features a powerful command-line interface, two-way data binding, and an integrated router, making it particularly adept at creating scalable single-page applications. Additionally, Ember.js supports a vibrant community and a comprehensive ecosystem of plugins and add-ons, reducing the need to reinvent the wheel for common tasks.

Recommended for

  • Developers and teams building large-scale or complex web applications
  • Projects that require long-term maintenance and stability
  • Teams that benefit from a strong convention-driven approach
  • Applications that need real-time data updates and dynamic interfaces

Overall verdict

  • TouchDevelop was a well-designed educational programming tool created by Microsoft Research, but it has been discontinued and is no longer actively maintained or accessible as of 2019, making it not a viable choice for current use despite its historically innovative design.

Why this product is good

  • Pioneered touch-based coding for tablets and phones, letting users write scripts by tapping rather than typing
  • Cloud-based platform allowed scripts to run and sync across web, Windows, and mobile devices
  • Strong educational focus with a simple, structured language ideal for teaching programming fundamentals
  • Included a built-in library for accessing device sensors, media, and social APIs, enabling fun and interactive app creation
  • Backed by Microsoft Research, ensuring quality design and pedagogical thoughtfulness during its active years

Recommended for

  • Historical or academic interest in early mobile/touch-based coding environments
  • Researchers studying the evolution of educational programming tools
  • Not recommended for current coding education or app development due to discontinuation

Videos

Walkthroughs and reviews on video.

ember.js 2 videos + Add
TouchDevelop 1 video + Add

What is Ember.js?

More videos

  • - A preview of Ember.js Octane

TouchDevelop - Create apps ON your phone!

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
ember.js
TouchDevelop
100% 100%
0% 0%
0% 0%
100% 100%
100% 100%
0% 0%
0% 0%
IDE
100% 100%

User comments

Share your experience with using ember.js and TouchDevelop. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Reviews and articles

External articles and on-site reviews we used to compare the two products.

ember.js no reviews yet
TouchDevelop no reviews yet

View more

We have no reviews of TouchDevelop yet. Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

ember.js 37 mentions
TouchDevelop 0 mentions
  • Rescue Me: ember-website
    If you visit emberjs.com, you won't see any visual difference. The internals, however, changed significantly for the better. - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago
  • I ported shadcn/ui to modern Ember.js
    About a week ago, I made shadcn-ember public. It is an unofficial, community-led port of shadcn/ui for Ember.js. - Source: dev.to / 9 months ago
  • Apple's App Store Full Front End Source Code
    Didn’t SproutCore become Ember [1]? Just my vague recollection, not sure if that was the case though. Anyway, Ember is still used and maintained, despite not being very well known. 1. https://emberjs.com/. - Source: Hacker News / 12 months ago

View more

Tracking TouchDevelop since Mar 2021.

Alternatives to ember.js and TouchDevelop

When comparing ember.js and TouchDevelop, you can also consider the following products.