Software Alternatives & Startups
Register | Login

EJS VS Google Sites

Compare EJS VS Google Sites and see what are their differences

EJS
EJS

An open source JavaScript Template library.

Rating
0 reviews
Pricing
Open source
Alternatives Is it good?
Google Sites

Access Google Sites with a free Google account (for personal use) or G Suite account (for business use).

Rating
0 reviews
Alternatives Is it good?
Umso
The Website Builder for Startups sponsored
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Which is more popular?

Based on our record, EJS seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 26 times since March 2021.

social mentions
26 vs 0
Javascript UI Libraries popularity
100% vs 0%
alternatives listed
157 vs 240+

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

EJS
EJS
Google Sites
Website ejs.co sites.google.com
Pricing
Open source
—
Listed in
Localization Development Front-End Frameworks Javascript UI Libraries +1
Website Builder Site Builder CMS Website Design +1

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

EJS
EJS 6 features
Google Sites 6 features
  • Simplicity
    EJS is easy to learn and use, especially for developers who are already familiar with JavaScript. The syntax is straightforward, making it a good choice for quick application development.
  • JavaScript Integration
    Since EJS templates are JavaScript files, you can seamlessly integrate JavaScript code, making it easy to manipulate data and use familiar JavaScript functions.
  • Lightweight
    EJS is a lightweight template engine, which makes it an optimal choice for applications where performance and simplicity are critical.
  • Flexibility
    Allows for the embedding of plain JavaScript within the templates, giving developers the flexibility to add logic directly in their HTML.
  • Partial Templates
    Supports partials, which help to reuse code snippets across different views, promoting DRY (Don't Repeat Yourself) principles.
  • Server-Side Rendering
    Supports server-side rendering, which can improve performance by reducing the amount of client-side processing needed.

Possible disadvantages

  • Limited Functionality
    Compared to more feature-rich template engines like Handlebars or Pug, EJS offers limited functionalities which might be a drawback for large, complex projects.
  • Debugging
    Debugging EJS templates can sometimes be challenging. Errors within templates can often be vague, making it difficult to trace the root cause.
  • Maintenance
    Embedding a lot of JavaScript within templates can make the code harder to read and maintain, especially as the complexity of the application grows.
  • Performance Overhead
    For very large and complex templates, EJS can introduce a performance overhead compared to more optimized template engines designed for high performance.
  • Community and Support
    While EJS has a reasonable user base, the community and support may not be as extensive as more popular alternatives like React or Vue.js.
  • User-Friendly Interface
    Google Sites offers a simple and intuitive drag-and-drop interface, making it easy for users with no technical skills to create and manage websites.
  • Integration with Google Services
    It seamlessly integrates with other Google services like Google Drive, Google Analytics, and Google Calendar, enhancing productivity and collaboration.
  • Free to Use
    Google Sites is available for free with a Google account, making it an affordable option for individuals and small businesses.
  • Responsive Design
    Websites created with Google Sites are automatically responsive, ensuring they look good on any device, including tablets and smartphones.
  • Collaboration Features
    Multiple users can collaborate in real-time on the same site, which is particularly beneficial for teams working on shared projects.
  • Secure Hosting
    Google Sites is hosted on Google's secure servers, providing strong security and reliability without the need for additional hosting services.

Possible disadvantages

  • Limited Customization
    Google Sites offers fewer customization options compared to other website builders, which can be restrictive for advanced users seeking unique designs.
  • Basic Features
    While it covers essential functions, Google Sites lacks some advanced features found in other website-building platforms, such as extensive e-commerce tools or plugins.
  • Inconsistent Browser Support
    Certain features may not work consistently across all browsers, which can affect the user experience and functionality of the site.
  • Limited Template Options
    The number of available templates is limited, which might not be sufficient for users looking for specific styles or thematic flexibility.
  • SEO Limitations
    Google Sites has basic SEO capabilities, making it challenging to fully optimize sites for search engine performance compared to other platforms.
  • No Custom Domain for Free Plan
    Users on the free plan cannot use a custom domain, which can make the site appear less professional.

Analysis

An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.

EJS
EJS
Google Sites

Overall verdict

  • Yes, EJS is considered good, particularly for projects where developers want ease of use and flexibility with JavaScript templating. It is lightweight, easy to learn, and integrates well with Express, a popular Node.js web application framework.

Why this product is good

  • EJS (Embedded JavaScript Templating) is popular because it provides a simple way to generate HTML markup with plain JavaScript. It allows for the embedding of JavaScript logic within your HTML templates, making it straightforward to use for those familiar with JavaScript. It's known for its efficiency in rendering templates and ease of integration with Node.js applications.

Recommended for

    EJS is recommended for developers building server-side web applications using Node.js and those looking for a simple, yet effective, templating solution. It is particularly suitable for small to medium-sized projects where dynamic content generation is needed and for teams that prioritize simplicity and performance.

Overall verdict

  • Google Sites is a solid option for those in need of a straightforward and cost-effective solution for building simple websites. However, it may not be suitable for complex or highly customized projects due to its limited customization options compared to other website builders.

Why this product is good

  • Google Sites is a good choice for individuals or small businesses looking for a simple and free platform to create basic websites. It is part of the Google Workspace suite, which integrates smoothly with other Google services like Google Drive, Google Docs, and Google Calendar, making it easy to incorporate these elements into your site. The platform is user-friendly, allowing users with no coding skills to create websites through its drag-and-drop interface. It also offers responsive design, automatically adjusting your site to look good on desktops, tablets, and mobile devices.

Recommended for

  • Individuals and small businesses who need a basic web presence
  • Educators and students for creating class projects or sharing resources
  • Teams needing internal sites for sharing information within organizations
  • Users already familiar with and using other Google Workspace applications

Videos

Walkthroughs and reviews on video.

EJS
EJS 2 videos + Add
Google Sites 3 videos + Add

Kane Creek - Bestop Trail Review at EJS 2019

More videos

  • - JavaScript Templating Tutorial | Introduction To EJS

Google Sites Pros and Cons of this Excellent FREE Website Builder

More videos

  • - Future of Google Sites (Cloud Next '19)
  • - How to Use the New Google Sites

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
EJS
EJS
Google Sites
100% 100%
Javascript UI Libraries
0% 0%
0% 0%
Website Builder
100% 100%
100% 100%
Development
0% 0%
0% 0%
CMS
100% 100%

User comments

Share your experience with using EJS and Google Sites. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Reviews and articles

External articles and on-site reviews we used to compare the two products.

EJS
EJS no reviews yet
Google Sites no reviews yet

We have no reviews of EJS yet. Be the first one to post

  • 19 Best WordPress Alternatives in 2025
    www.pixpa.com · Oct 2024

    Google Sites is a free website builder that allows anyone with a Google account to create and publish a website. It offers a user-friendly interface, pre-built templates, and basic tools for creating webpages.

Social recommendations and mentions

Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

EJS
EJS 26 mentions
Google Sites 0 mentions
  • Next.js vs Express: What to Choose in 2025?
    Express does not provide SEO benefits by default and would require additional configuration with tools like EJS (Embedded JavaScript) or Handlebars for server-side rendering. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
  • Chapter 7: HTML part two
    For a more robust approach, we'd probably need to install a templating language of some kind, such as Twig, EJS, Handlebars, Pug or Mustache (this is not a complete list!). Reading the documentation for posthtml-modules, you'll notice it... - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
  • Web Components and SSR - 2024 Edition
    Server-side Framework SSR is when you use a framework that runs the HTML templating logic entirely on the server to compose the HTML that will be rendered in the browser. These are frameworks like Ruby on Rails, ASP.Net, PHP, or even... - Source: dev.to / almost 2 years ago

View more

Tracking Google Sites since Mar 2021.

Alternatives to EJS and Google Sites

When comparing EJS and Google Sites, you can also consider the following products.

Loading...