EditorConfig VS Git-appraise

• Consistency Across Editors
  EditorConfig helps maintain consistent coding styles for multiple developers working on the same project across various editors and IDEs. This ensures that all developers adhere to the same coding standards, minimizing discrepancies in code formatting.
• Ease of Use
  EditorConfig files are simple to set up and use. Once the configuration file is in place, any supported editor with the EditorConfig plugin installed will automatically enforce the styles, requiring minimal ongoing maintenance from developers.
• Compatibility
  EditorConfig is compatible with a wide range of editors and IDEs through plugins, allowing developers to use their preferred development environment while still adhering to project-wide formatting rules.
• Source Control Friendliness
  By enforcing consistent styles, EditorConfig reduces the likelihood of unnecessary code diffs caused by differing formatting preferences, making version control diffs cleaner and easier to understand.

Possible disadvantages

• Limited Scope
  EditorConfig focuses primarily on basic whitespace and file-ending settings. It does not provide comprehensive style enforcement, such as linting for programming language-specific syntax rules or convention enforcement beyond formatting.
• Requires Editor Support
  EditorConfig requires either native support or plugins to be installed in the editor or IDE. If a developer is using an unsupported editor or does not have the plugin installed, they may not benefit from the configuration.
• Potential for Inconsistencies
  Depending on the implementation of the EditorConfig plugin in specific editors, there can be slight differences in how rules are applied. This can potentially lead to inconsistencies if not all team members use the same tools or versions.
• Basic Feature Set
  EditorConfig’s feature set is relatively basic compared to other tools that offer more robust configurations and checks, such as full-featured code linters and formatters that enforce a wider array of coding conventions and rules.

No features have been listed yet.

EditorConfig, A tool I include in all my projects

More videos

No Git-appraise videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

• Coding in Style

  I can update the indentation configuration in neovim, but I think a much nicer option and better convention would be to set up .editorconfig. - Source: dev.to / 7 months ago

• Writing a Good Claude.md

  - tokens are relatively cheap but they're not free on a paid plan; why spend tokens on something linters and formatters can do deterministically and for free? If you wanted Claude Code to handle linting automatically, you're better off... - Source: Hacker News / 10 months ago

• Tabs vs. Spaces: The War Is Over

  I’ve also been tinkering around with AI-Coding assistants, having fun and learning many of the missing steps from my career. As someone who loved to write codes that are well formatted, well named, and well organized, the one thing I... - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago

View more

• The August 17 outage, and the work ahead

  I'm particularly fond of the concepts within git-appraise, gits back to the federated foundations https://github.com/google/git-appraise (unmaintained). - Source: Hacker News / about 1 month ago

• Gleam Is Now on Tangled

  This was a really intriguing project that became Google abandonware. https://github.com/google/git-appraise The idea is to use git-notes for issues & PRs, because git is already distributed by design and these elements of SDLC... - Source: Hacker News / 2 months ago

• If I Could Make My Own GitHub

  There were a few efforts like this back in the day (when people still cared about offline and store-and-forward-style operation[1]), like Bugs Everywhere[3], git-appraise[4] notable for storing its data in Git’s little-known “notes”... - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago

View more