Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Editor.js VS FSET

Compare Editor.js VS FSET and see what are their differences

Editor.js logo Editor.js

A block-styled editor with clean JSON output

FSET logo FSET

A JSON Schema editor, no more writing json schema by hand
  • Editor.js Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-09-24
  • FSET Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-05-03

Editor.js features and specs

  • Modular Architecture
    Editor.js is designed with a modular architecture, allowing users to add and remove tools (blocks) as needed, which provides flexibility and extensibility.
  • Block Style Editor
    The editor uses a block-style approach, where each type of content (paragraphs, images, videos, etc.) is treated as a separate block, making complex layouts easier to manage and edit.
  • Clean JSON Output
    Produces structured JSON data that is easy to parse and process, which is beneficial for storing content in a database or serving it via an API.
  • API Flexibility
    Offers a well-documented API that developers can use to create custom tools and extensions, enhancing the editor's functionality and adapting it to specific use cases.
  • Lightweight & Fast
    The editor is lightweight and performs well, offering a responsive experience for users, even on less powerful devices.
  • Open Source
    As an open-source project, Editor.js allows developers to contribute to its development and tailor it to their own needs without licensing fees.
  • Rich Plugin Ecosystem
    A variety of plugins are available that extend the core functionality of Editor.js, covering a wide range of use-cases from simple text editing to complex multimedia integration.

Possible disadvantages of Editor.js

  • Steep Learning Curve
    While powerful, the modular architecture can be confusing for new users who are not familiar with block-based editors.
  • Limited Built-In Tools
    Out-of-the-box, Editor.js provides only basic functionality, requiring additional plugins or custom development for more advanced features.
  • Dependency on JavaScript
    Editor.js heavily relies on JavaScript, which might be a limitation for environments where JavaScript is restricted or needs to be minimized.
  • Plugin Compatibility
    Since the ecosystem includes plugins developed by various contributors, there may be issues with compatibility or stability between different plugins.
  • Configuration Complexity
    Setting up and configuring Editor.js with all necessary tools and plugins can be time-consuming and complex, requiring a good understanding of JavaScript and its ecosystem.
  • Lack of Native Features
    Some features that are standard in other rich-text editors, like WYSIWYG capabilities, are not natively available in Editor.js, necessitating additional development.
  • Accessibility Concerns
    Ensuring the editor meets accessibility standards (e.g., WCAG) might require extra effort, as not all plugins and customizations may adhere to best practices.

FSET features and specs

  • User-Friendly Interface
    FSET offers an intuitive and easy-to-navigate interface that makes it accessible for users with varying levels of technical expertise.
  • Comprehensive Feature Set
    The platform provides a wide range of tools and features that support various aspects of software development, making it a versatile option for developers.
  • Cloud-Based Access
    Being cloud-based, FSET allows users to access their projects from anywhere with an internet connection, enhancing collaboration and flexibility.
  • Collaborative Tools
    FSET includes built-in tools for team collaboration, allowing multiple users to work on the same project simultaneously and share feedback efficiently.
  • Regular Updates
    The platform frequently updates its features and security measures, ensuring users benefit from the latest advancements and protections.

Possible disadvantages of FSET

  • Potential Learning Curve
    Some users may experience a learning curve when first using FSET, especially if they are not familiar with similar tools or platforms.
  • Subscription Costs
    FSET might involve subscription fees which could be a barrier for small teams or individual developers working with tight budgets.
  • Internet Dependency
    As a cloud-based tool, FSET relies on a stable internet connection, which may be problematic for users in areas with unreliable internet access.
  • Limited Offline Functionality
    Users may find the offline capabilities of FSET lacking, posing challenges for those who need to work without internet access.
  • Compatibility Issues
    There could be occasional compatibility issues with certain third-party tools or systems, which might require additional configurations to resolve.

Analysis of Editor.js

Overall verdict

  • Editor.js is considered a good choice for developers who need a flexible, modern content editing solution that prioritizes structured data. It is particularly beneficial for projects where content needs to be presented in various ways or integrated with complex data models. However, it might not be the best fit for those seeking a traditional, more intuitive text editing experience out-of-the-box.

Why this product is good

  • Editor.js is designed to be a block-styled editor, which provides a clean and flexible way to handle content. It focuses on modern use cases such as creating structured data content, offering a unique approach compared to traditional WYSIWYG editors. Its emphasis on separation of data and views makes it easy to present the content in different formats. Additionally, it offers a highly pluggable architecture, enabling developers to extend its functionality with custom blocks.

Recommended for

  • Developers building applications requiring structured data
  • Projects where content must be easily re-purposed or presented differently
  • Teams who benefit from a highly customizable and extendable editor
  • Use cases involving complex integrations with data-driven systems

Editor.js videos

Editor.js - An Awesome Next Gen Block Styled Content Editor!

More videos:

  • Review - umbraCoffee #079 - Editor.js, tide flows, and Codegarden blues

FSET videos

No FSET videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Editor.js and FSET)
Text Editors
100 100%
0% 0
Productivity
0 0%
100% 100
Rich Text Editor
87 87%
13% 13
Developer Tools
46 46%
54% 54

User comments

Share your experience with using Editor.js and FSET. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Editor.js and FSET

Editor.js Reviews

14 Best Open Source WYSIWYG HTML Editors
Editor.js gives you the perks of a block-style editor. The headings, paragraphs, and other items are all separate blocks, which makes them editable while not affecting the rest of the content.
Source: itsfoss.com

FSET Reviews

We have no reviews of FSET yet.
Be the first one to post

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Editor.js and FSET, you can also consider the following products

CKEditor - Real-time collaborative future-ready rich text editor

Quill - Powerful, API-driven rich text editor

AutoResponder for Slack - Quick & easy out of office messages in Slack

Aloha Editor - Aloha Editor is an HTML5 WYSIWYG Editor that gives you a total new experience when editing.

Optitex - Optitex is an integrated pack of collaborative design studios for the trend is driven consumer product enterprises.

TinyMCE - TinyMCE is a content editor that functions as a plug-in for Wordpress websites.