Software Alternatives & Startups

EasyTestMaker VS QB64

Compare EasyTestMaker VS QB64 and see what are their differences

EasyTestMaker

EasyTestMaker is an online test generator to help you create and manage your tests!

Rating
0 reviews
QB64

Development

Rating
0 reviews
Pricing
Open source

Which is more popular?

Based on our record, EasyTestMaker seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 2 times since March 2021.

social mentions
2 vs 0
Education popularity
85% vs 15%
alternatives listed
57 vs 33

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

EasyTestMaker
QB64
Website easytestmaker.com qb64.org
Pricing —
Open source
Listed in

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

EasyTestMaker 5 features
QB64 5 features
  • User-Friendly Interface
    EasyTestMaker offers an intuitive and straightforward interface, allowing teachers and educators to create tests without needing advanced technical skills.
  • Multiple Question Formats
    The platform supports a variety of question types, including multiple-choice, true/false, matching, and short answer, providing flexibility in test design.
  • Automatic Grading
    EasyTestMaker provides automatic grading features, saving educators time by quickly assessing student performance on objective questions.
  • Cloud Storage
    Tests are stored in the cloud, giving users the ability to access and edit their work from any location with an internet connection.
  • Printable Tests
    Tests can be easily exported and printed, accommodating classrooms or environments where electronic testing is not ideal.

Possible disadvantages

  • Limited Free Version
    The free version of EasyTestMaker comes with limitations on the number of tests and questions, potentially requiring users to purchase a subscription for full capabilities.
  • Basic Design Customization
    Customization options for test appearance and design are limited, which might not meet the needs of users looking for more advanced formatting and style possibilities.
  • Internet Dependency
    Since EasyTestMaker operates in the cloud, a stable internet connection is necessary for creating and accessing tests, which may be a limitation in areas with unreliable connectivity.
  • Limited Integration
    The platform may offer limited integration with other educational tools and Learning Management Systems (LMS), which could restrict its use in more complex educational setups.
  • Subjective Question Limitation
    While the platform handles objective questions well, it may not offer robust support for subjective questions where manual grading and detailed feedback are necessary.
  • Compatibility
    QB64 maintains compatibility with QBasic and QuickBASIC code, allowing users to run legacy programs without modification.
  • Cross-Platform
    QB64 is available on major operating systems like Windows, macOS, and Linux, offering flexibility to developers.
  • Modern Enhancements
    Incorporates modern features such as improved graphics, sound support, and networking capabilities beyond what was possible in the original QBasic.
  • Open Source
    Being open-source software, QB64 encourages community involvement, transparency, and contributions to the codebase.
  • Ease of Use
    Retains a simple, user-friendly interface that is accessible to beginners while providing powerful features for advanced users.

Possible disadvantages

  • Performance
    While optimized for modern systems, QB64 can be slower than more contemporary programming languages, particularly for complex applications.
  • Limited Ecosystem
    QB64 lacks the extensive library support and community resources available to more popular languages like Python or Java.
  • Learning Curve for Advanced Features
    Users familiar with original QBasic may find it challenging to adapt to the newer, advanced features without proper documentation.
  • Niche Use Case
    Its primary appeal is for legacy support and nostalgia, which limits its application in modern, large-scale software development.
  • Legacy Language Constraints
    QB64 inherits some limitations of BASIC, such as less structured programming paradigms, which can impact code clarity and maintainability.

Videos

Walkthroughs and reviews on video.

EasyTestMaker 3 videos + Add
QB64 3 videos + Add

EasyTestMaker TUTORIAL

More videos

  • - EasyTestMaker
  • - easytestmaker

✅ Trying out QB64 v1.5 with my little platform game - Day 7

More videos

  • - QB64 Report - S01E02 - SCREEN modes
  • - Old man Nick tries coding QB/QB64?

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
EasyTestMaker
QB64
85% 85%
15% 15%
0% 0%
IDE
100% 100%
100% 100%
LMS
0% 0%
0% 0%
100% 100%

User comments

Share your experience with using EasyTestMaker and QB64. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Reviews and articles

External articles and on-site reviews we used to compare the two products.

EasyTestMaker no reviews yet
QB64 no reviews yet

View more

We have no reviews of QB64 yet. Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

EasyTestMaker 2 mentions
QB64 0 mentions
  • How do you make tests?
    If you are looking for how to actually type out the test, you need to think about format, absent students, and possible test do overs based on your particular needs. So if you want to make a paper and pencil test. You can just type... Source: over 3 years ago
  • Make a test that students are able to review results
    Hi, I made a test with easytestmaker.com, and, unfortunately, students are not able to review the results of the exam. I as the test maker can see the results but not the students. Can you please share a test-making website that provides... Source: almost 5 years ago

Tracking QB64 since May 2021.

Alternatives to EasyTestMaker and QB64

When comparing EasyTestMaker and QB64, you can also consider the following products.