EasyOptOuts.com Reviews

1. Crystal Miller

   over 2 years ago
   Spread the Word

   I can't recommend this company enough! The signup process was so easy. I started seeing results right away. Everything about the website and signup is streamlined, simple, and easy to navigate. I had a follow-up question about a concern with my cell phone number and they answered it the next day with a solution. They are awesome and effective. I can't imagine how many hours they saved me. It's definitely worth $20 per year for an online scan every 4 months searching and opting out my personal info.

2. D.

   · Teacher · almost 4 years ago
   Amazing and Quick

   The data removal was amazing and super quick. The process was easy and very inexpensive. Highly recommend . The support team was super responsive in answering all my questions. My personal data is no longer spread all over the internet.

Cppcheck Reviews

EasyOptOuts.com mentions (20)

• How to Delete Your Data from Data Brokers

  I highly recommend https://easyoptouts.com/. - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago

• Improving your online privacy: An update

  > Removing your information from all databrokers https://easyoptouts.com / incogni / deleteme / optery How ironic. In order to remove my data from the internet, I first need to give my data to that random website. - Source: Hacker News / almost 3 years ago

• Improving your online privacy: An update

  Not mentioned: Removing your information from all social media / messengers : https://redact.dev (disclaimer, im on the team) Removing your information from all databrokers https://easyoptouts.com. - Source: Hacker News / almost 3 years ago

• Are Deleteme and other PII scrubbers reliable?

  I run a competing service called easyoptouts.com. Here's what we do for most people-search sites:. Source: about 3 years ago

• DeleteMe Alternative

  I co-founded easyoptouts.com a couple years ago because all of the other options seemed unreasonably expensive. Source: about 3 years ago

Cppcheck mentions (10)

• Configuring Cppcheck, Cpplint, and JSON Lint

  I dedicated Sunday morning to going over the documentation of the linters we use in the project. The goal was to understand all options and use them in the best way for our project. Seeing their manuals side by side was nice because even very similar things are solved differently. Cppcheck is the most configurable and best documented; JSON Lint lies at the other end. - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago

• Enforcing Memory Safety?

  Using infer, someone else exploited null-dereference checks to introduce simple affine types in C++. Cppcheck also checks for null-dereferences. Unfortunately, that approach means that borrow-counting references have a larger sizeof than non-borrow counting references, so optimizing the count away potentially changes the semantics of a program which introduces a whole new way of writing subtly wrong code. Source: about 3 years ago

• Static Code analysis

  For my own projects, I used cppcheck. You can check out that tool to get a feel. Depending on what industry your in, you might need to follow a standard like Misra. Source: over 3 years ago

• How do you not shoot yourself in the foot ?

  Https://cppcheck.sourceforge.io/ (there are many other static analysis tools, I just haven't used them or didn't care for them). Source: over 3 years ago

• Linting tool for prohibiting the use of specific std types

  Sounds like something that could simply be communicated with the team that writes the tests. Unless you have dozens of such classes. In that case, you could just use e.g. Cppcheck and add a rule (regular expression) that searches for usages of the forbidden classes. Source: over 3 years ago