
Countdown Screensaver
It's Almost
Time Since Launch
Ubi Timer
TimeTil
Pomofocus
Pretty Progress
A simple countdown timer with an alarm for the browser.

QuickForm - Autofill Forms
Fake Filler
Magical
Fill Hero
Fake Data
Mockaroo
Test Data Management
Form Filler & Test Data Manager: AutoFill With Data You Control

Which is more popular?
Based on our record, E.ggtimer.com seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 1 time since March 2021.
Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Website | e.ggtimer.com | fillr.app |
| Pricing | — | |
| Platforms | — | |
| Company | — | 2026 |
| Listed in |
In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.


No description of E.ggtimer.com yet.
Fillr is a form filler and test data manager for Chrome — for when it matters what goes into every field. Save any form as a preset with a rule per field, fill it from your own CSV or Excel rows, and manage all your test data in one place. Realistic generated data (110+ types, 60+ languages) is...
What each product offers, as listed by its team.


Possible disadvantages
An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.


No analysis of E.ggtimer.com yet.
Overall verdict
Why this product is good
Recommended for
Walkthroughs and reviews on video.
Teachers Guide to e.ggtimer.com
No Fillr.app videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.
How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.


As answered by people managing E.ggtimer.com and Fillr.app.
Fillr.app's answer:
It leads with control, not random fill. Capture any web form as a reusable preset, set per-field rules (generated, fixed, your own data, or skip), and refill in one click — plus a built-in Datasets module to build, generate, and export test data. A form-filler and test-data manager in one, no code.
Fillr.app's answer:
Fake Filler only sprays random data; Mockaroo generates data but can't fill forms. Fillr does both — and lets you fill with your own data, with reusable presets, per-field control, and 60+ locales. No scripts.
Fillr.app's answer:
QA engineers and developers who repeatedly test web forms and need realistic, controllable test data. Demo and sales engineers are a natural secondary audience.
Fillr.app's answer:
Next.js 15, React 19, and TypeScript dashboard; a Manifest V3 Chrome extension built with Vite and supabase for backend
Share your experience with using E.ggtimer.com and Fillr.app. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.


>a viable replacement that managed to survive the Google onslaught One I like better, no ads, no stopwatch function though: https://e.ggtimer.com/. - Source: Hacker News / about 4 years ago
Tracking Fillr.app since Jun 2026.
When comparing E.ggtimer.com and Fillr.app, you can also consider the following products.

A Mac screensaver for counting down to a date 🖥🕐
Compare Countdown Screensaver to E.ggtimer.com or Fillr.app:

Chrome extension to autofill forms easier and faster.
Compare QuickForm - Autofill Forms to E.ggtimer.com or Fillr.app:


The quickest way to fill all inputs on a page with fake data.
Compare Fake Filler to E.ggtimer.com or Fillr.app:

Long scale, single use stopwatch
Compare Time Since Launch to E.ggtimer.com or Fillr.app:
