Duecode.io
Embold.io
Klocwork
Code Dx Enterprise
Codacy
SonarQube
Coverity Scan
GitHub
Cppcheck
SonarQube
Clang Static Analyzer
Coverity Scan
Polyspace
Parasoft C/C++test
Flawfinder
PVS-Studio
Duecode.io CppcheckNo features have been listed yet.
Cppcheck is recommended for C/C++ developers and development teams, particularly those responsible for maintaining large codebases or projects where code quality and reliability are paramount. It is also beneficial for educational purposes, where students and new developers can learn about potential pitfalls in C/C++ programming.
Based on our record, Cppcheck should be more popular than Duecode.io. It has been mentiond 10 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
Hi to all! Recently our team launched a new website and I was wondering whether you can provide your feedback about it? It will be extremely useful for us so I'm looking forward to hear it! Thanks in advance https://duecode.io/. Source: over 4 years ago
The further I dig into to this, the fishier this smells. First, I thought it was odd that u/duefocusteam is acting like they just came across an article on duecode.io (kind of sus, as the kids would say). So I decided to 'due' some digging (That feeling you're experiencing is cringe, trust me it will pass). Source: over 4 years ago
I dedicated Sunday morning to going over the documentation of the linters we use in the project. The goal was to understand all options and use them in the best way for our project. Seeing their manuals side by side was nice because even very similar things are solved differently. Cppcheck is the most configurable and best documented; JSON Lint lies at the other end. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
Using infer, someone else exploited null-dereference checks to introduce simple affine types in C++. Cppcheck also checks for null-dereferences. Unfortunately, that approach means that borrow-counting references have a larger sizeof than non-borrow counting references, so optimizing the count away potentially changes the semantics of a program which introduces a whole new way of writing subtly wrong code. Source: over 2 years ago
For my own projects, I used cppcheck. You can check out that tool to get a feel. Depending on what industry your in, you might need to follow a standard like Misra. Source: over 2 years ago
Https://cppcheck.sourceforge.io/ (there are many other static analysis tools, I just haven't used them or didn't care for them). Source: over 2 years ago
Sounds like something that could simply be communicated with the team that writes the tests. Unless you have dozens of such classes. In that case, you could just use e.g. Cppcheck and add a rule (regular expression) that searches for usages of the forbidden classes. Source: over 2 years ago
Embold.io - Peer Code Review
SonarQube - SonarQube, a core component of the Sonar solution, is an open source, self-managed tool that systematically helps developers and organizations deliver Clean Code.
Klocwork - Klocwork is a static code analysis and SAST tool for C, C++, C#, Java, and JavaScript.
Clang Static Analyzer - The Clang Static Analyzer is a source code analysis tool that finds bugs in C, C++, and Objective-C...
Code Dx Enterprise - Code Dx is the only tool that integrates numerous open-source solutions for application vulnerability management. Practical solution for software security.
Coverity Scan - Find and fix defects in your Java, C/C++ or C# open source project for free