Drupal Reviews

GitHub MCP Server Reviews

Drupal mentions (28)

• Is there and easy way of porting a site from d7 to d9?

  I would be interested in some good migration tools, paid ones are also ok. I found a post about this on drupal.org, but it didn't seem like an easy process. It is a multilanguage site with many content types, and a totally custom theme. Source: almost 4 years ago

• Is there any nice group, where I can ask questions, when I get stuck and recieve some guidance instead of crytics?

  You got already good advice, but wanted to point the guide of drupal.org where you can see some tools listed with instructions and channels https://www.drupal.org/community/contributor-guide/reference-information/talk/tools. Source: almost 4 years ago

• MAMP issue after Pro trial ended

  There is a service call GitPod that provides a temporary container Drupal environment. If you are familiar with what is going on around the future of how Drupal modules will eventually be offered up, you will likely have seen the "Project Browser" module as a contrib demo of the approach. It is used for people to give feedback to the developers. So they set up the typical 'SimplyTestMe' but also a GitPod... Source: almost 4 years ago

• Best Modules for Product and Recipe?

  For reviews, it depends entirely on what you mean by "review". I believe core has a simple comment module, although it may have been deprecated for D9? There are likely many review-style modules on drupal.org that might work, or if you just want to link out to third-party reviews then it could just be a repeating-value link field on the Product content type. Source: almost 4 years ago

• Leadership?

  They should also use standards tools like Github. The drupal.org platform was certainly impressive 10 years ago, today it's a pain to use it. They ducktape it with gitlab, but really it sucks to have to read documentation to simply do a pull request. Source: almost 4 years ago

GitHub MCP Server mentions (18)

• Do unused MCP tools cost you money?

  I have a small "GitHub summarizer" agent: one system prompt, one job — answer questions about my GitHub account by calling the GitHub MCP server. I duplicated its configuration (MAVERIK supports this directly — same model, same prompt, same everything) and changed one field on the copy: the set of attached MCP servers, adding deepwiki, microsoft-learn, and context7. Neither agent needs any of those three for the... - Source: dev.to / 12 days ago

• Every API Will Be Rebuilt for Agents

  GitHub's official MCP server is excellent — and GitHub is narrowing its default toolset and consolidating PR tools into fewer, more capable ones, explicitly to cut tool bloat and improve agent reasoning. The implication is hard to miss: even one of the best API companies on the planet is learning that a 1:1 mapping from product API to agent tools isn't the right shape. - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago

• Your AI Agent Has Push Access to Every Repo

  The official GitHub MCP server registers 83 tools. Most people set it up for reading code and managing issues. What they don't realise is they've also handed their agent the keys to:. - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago

• Helping Claude Do Its Best Work

  A lot of people use MCP servers to connect Claude to tools. I'm not generally a fan. MCP servers load a lot of information into context and often don't do everything that the API can. Last I looked, even the official Github MCP Server is guilty of this. I'd rather write tools directly, to my specifications. - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago

• Kiro showcase: Automating Changes Across Several Repos with Spec-Driven Development and Custom Sub-Agents

  Rather than manually searching through repositories, I used Kiro with the GitHub MCP server to:. - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago