Dropbox DocSend
PandaDoc
Qwilr
Proposify
GetAccept
Papermark
Prezi
Conga Contracts
Clearbit
Apollo.io
Lusha
DiscoverOrg
Hunter.io
ZoomInfo
UpLead
Lead411
Dropbox DocSend is a secure file and document sharing solution that gives users analytics and control on sent documents to see who opens documents, who they forward them to, and how long they look at each page. Users can turn off access, password protect, or set an expiration at any time. Dropbox DocSend integrates with SalesForce as well as Box, Dropbox, Google Drive, and OneDrive. Use cases include investor relations, board management, and similar transactions where secure sharing is required. Additionally, DocSend Spaces, a relatively new feature, is presented as a secure and customizable virtual data room solution.
Key features include sending documents as secure and trackable links, eSignature, and customizable virtual data rooms.
DocSend was acquired by Dropbox in March 2021. It is now a Dropbox brand.
Dropbox DocSend ClearbitDropbox DocSend is recommended for sales teams, marketing professionals, startups, and any organization or individual that requires secure document sharing with extensive tracking capabilities. It is particularly useful for those needing to manage sensitive information or ensure that their content is being accessed appropriately.
DocSend is the best software for sharing business critical information like pitch decks, sales proposals, and creative presentations with its security, control, and document tracking features. They even have built in eSignatures, one-click NDAs, and watermarking. Highly recommend!
Based on our record, Clearbit should be more popular than Dropbox DocSend. It has been mentiond 18 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
From a cybersecurity perspective.. We block access to online-storage-and-backup. Say we would want to allow access to a specific docsend URL.. Say docsend.com/thing/document . The issue is due to the redirects used by docsend... The Palo sees www.docsend.com, docsend.com and various subdomains used to style the HTML before a user can get to docsend.com/thing/document. Looking for any recommendations for allowing... Source: about 3 years ago
Not using docsend.com! Or a similar platform that you can use to track who is opening your deck and who they’re sending it to. Not only does it give you good analytics on which slides are performing well . . . It discourages folks sending your deck to who you don’t want to! Source: over 3 years ago
It's really not at all. https://upload.disroot.org/ - 2GB per file, end to end encrypted, source: https://github.com/ldidry/lufi, other instances: https://alt.framasoft.org/framadrop/ https://datash.co/ - end to end encrypted, made for transfer between two devices https://send.tresorit.com/ - 5GB per file, end to end encrypted https://github.com/kern/filepizza - WebRTC + STUN/TURN file transfer between multiple... - Source: Hacker News / almost 4 years ago
Some display names need a lookup table, not fuzzy strings. Pairs like Investing.com / Fusion Media Limited or Lyrie.ai / OTT Cybersecurity Inc. Share almost no tokens, so WRatio stays low and that's correct behavior. For irreconcilable aliases like that you still want GLEIF, Clearbit, or simply a maintained slug → legal_name map. Fuzzy matching handles stylistic drift on the same name; it can’t handle unrelated... - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
Personal email domains destroy this. Clearbit's Enrichment API returns a null company when it hits gmail.com. Apollo routes personal domains straight to a consumer bucket and skips B2B fields entirely. Even PDL's /person/enrich endpoint — the most permissive of the major providers — gives you around 32% hit rate on Gmail addresses versus 74% on corporate domains. I measured this across 6,200 signups for a... - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
A few things worth flagging: PDL beats Clearbit's historical rates for US and Western European companies, but drops to ~52% match rate for Japan and South Korea specifically. Apollo underperforms on raw company matching but returns significantly more contacts per domain in Prospector-style queries than Clearbit's Prospector ever did — the tradeoff is more stale titles in the result set. Hunter.io is fast and cheap... - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago
Match rate of 38% in my test, but the data quality on what it does match is solid: title, seniority, industry, company size all returned cleanly. If you're already in HubSpot and enriching form fills in-place, Clearbit/Breeze is probably your lowest-friction option even at lower match rates. If you're not in HubSpot, there's no reason to choose it over PDL or Prospeo. - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago
One thing comparison guides consistently get wrong: Clay is not an enrichment API. It's a waterfall orchestration tool that calls People Data Labs, Apollo, Clearbit, and others in sequence for you. It's useful, but it adds 2–8 seconds of latency per row in my runs and costs more per match than going direct. For a CRM webhook flow where you need sub-second enrichment calls, Clay is the wrong layer to hit first. - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago
PandaDoc - Boost your revenue with PandaDoc. A document automation tool that delivers higher close rates and shorter sales cycles. We've helped over 30,000+ companies.
Apollo.io - Apollo’s predictive prospecting, sales engagement, and actionable analytics help the teams to reach its full revenue potential.
Qwilr - Turn your quotes, proposals and presentations into interactive and mobile-friendly webpages that...
Lusha - Search less. Sell more.
Proposify - A simpler way to deliver winning proposals to clients.
DiscoverOrg - DiscoverOrg is an IT sales intelligence platform providing technology marketers access to data, IT org charts, and real time projects.