Software Alternatives & Startups

drive-cli VS rsync

Compare drive-cli VS rsync and see what are their differences

drive-cli

Google Drive client for the commandline

Rating
0 reviews
rsync

rsync is a file transfer program for Unix systems. rsync uses the "rsync algorithm" which provides a very fast method for bringing remote files into sync.

Rating
0 reviews
Pricing
Open source

Which is more popular?

Based on our record, rsync should be more popular than drive-cli. It has been mentioned 17 times since March 2021.

social mentions
6 vs 17
Cloud Storage popularity
14% vs 86%
alternatives listed
26 vs 240+

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

drive-cli
rsync
Website github.com rsync.samba.org
Pricing
Open source
Listed in

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

drive-cli 5 features
rsync 8 features
  • Open Source
    Drive-cli is open source, allowing developers to inspect, modify, and contribute to the codebase.
  • Lightweight
    Drive-cli is a lightweight tool with no unnecessary features, making it efficient for users who need a simple command-line interface for Google Drive operations.
  • Platform Independence
    As a command-line tool, drive-cli can be used on any platform, including Linux, macOS, and Windows, as long as Go is supported.
  • Version Control-like Features
    Drive-cli provides git-like operations, including pulling, pushing, and diff, to manage files in Google Drive efficiently.
  • Customizable and Flexible
    Users can customize their workflow with various flags and options, providing flexibility to automate tasks or integrate with scripts.

Possible disadvantages

  • Requires Technical Knowledge
    Non-technical users may find it challenging to use, as it requires familiarity with the command line and configuration of Google APIs.
  • Limited Official Support
    Being an open-source project, there might be limited official support and documentation, which can be an issue for users needing help.
  • Basic User Interface
    As a CLI tool, it lacks a graphical user interface, which can be a downside for users who prefer GUI-based interactions.
  • Ongoing Maintenance
    Depending on the activity of contributors and maintainers, there may be delays in updates and bug fixes.
  • Dependency on Google Drive API
    Functionality is dependent on Google Drive API, which may change, potentially causing disruptions or requiring updates to the tool.
  • Efficient Data Transfer
    Rsync uses a delta-transfer algorithm which allows it to update files by only sending the differences between the source and destination, greatly reducing the amount of data transferred.
  • Bandwidth Throttling
    Rsync provides an option to limit the bandwidth used during the transfer, helping to manage network resources and avoid congestion.
  • Compression
    Rsync supports compression of data during transfer, which can further reduce the amount of data sent over the network.
  • Secure Transfer
    Rsync can utilize SSH for secure data transfer, adding a layer of encryption to protect data as it moves between systems.
  • Versatile
    Rsync can be used for a variety of tasks such as backups, mirroring, and synchronization, making it a versatile tool for different data management needs.
  • Preserves File Attributes
    Rsync preserves file permissions, timestamps, ownerships, and symbolic links during the transfer, ensuring that all file attributes remain intact.
  • Widely Supported
    Rsync is available on most Unix-like operating systems and there are ports available for Windows, making it accessible across different platforms.
  • Open Source
    Rsync is free and open-source software, allowing anyone to use, modify, and distribute it without licensing fees.

Possible disadvantages

  • Complex Syntax
    The rsync command line options can be complex and difficult to master, especially for users who are not familiar with command-line interfaces.
  • Initial Setup
    Setting up rsync for the first time can be cumbersome, particularly when dealing with SSH keys, excluding files, and setting up cron jobs for automation.
  • Resource Intensive
    During large data transfers, rsync can be resource-intensive, consuming a considerable amount of CPU and RAM, which might affect system performance.
  • Limited Incremental Backup Support
    Rsync's incremental backup feature is somewhat limited and less sophisticated compared to dedicated backup solutions, requiring additional scripting for effective implementation.
  • Remote File System Compatibility
    Rsync may encounter issues with certain remote file systems that have different characteristics or limitations, such as differing maximum file path lengths or unsupported special characters.
  • No Native GUI
    Rsync does not have a native graphical user interface (GUI), which may make it less accessible to users who prefer or require a visual interaction.
  • No Built-in Scheduling
    Rsync lacks built-in scheduling capabilities, necessitating the use of external tools like cron (Linux/Unix) or Task Scheduler (Windows) to automate scheduled tasks.

Videos

Walkthroughs and reviews on video.

drive-cli 0 videos + Add
rsync 3 videos + Add

No drive-cli videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Rsync Backup on Linux

More videos

  • - How to Properly Use Cloud Storage | Rsync Encrypt Tutorial
  • - Setup OpenMediaVault 5.0 beta NAS on Raspberry Pi 4: RPi4 NAS + Configure RSync with x2 shares OMV5

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
drive-cli
rsync
14% 14%
86% 86%
3% 3%
97% 97%
100% 100%
0% 0%
4% 4%
96% 96%

User comments

Share your experience with using drive-cli and rsync. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Reviews and articles

External articles and on-site reviews we used to compare the two products.

drive-cli no reviews yet
rsync no reviews yet

We have no reviews of drive-cli yet. Be the first one to post

View more

Social recommendations and mentions

Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

drive-cli 6 mentions
rsync 17 mentions
  • 10 years since Google said to “hang tight” about Linux support for Google Drive
    I just want to collect the major options for Google Drive on Linux in a single comment, since a few options are scattered around: Insync works well, and it's 50% off for a couple more days: https://www.insynchq.com/ Not affiliated, but... - Source: Hacker News / over 4 years ago
  • Has anyone used rclone to get their Google Photos?
    Run this command to download (into your home directory): $ mkdir -p ~/.local/bin $ cd ~/.local/bin $ wget -c "https://github.com/odeke-em/drive/releases/download/v0.4.0/drive_linux" -O "drive-google" $ chmod a+x ./drive-google. Source: over 4 years ago
  • Has anyone used rclone to get their Google Photos?
    I personally use this project https://github.com/odeke-em/drive for syncing to/from google-drive. Source: over 4 years ago

View more

  • Openrsync: A BSD-licensed implementation of rsync, by the OpenBSD team
    Ubuntu's rsync is samba rsync. It's not part of the samba project per se, but it is made by the same guy and the official url is https://rsync.samba.org/ so it's entirely fair to call it samba rsync in my opinion. - Source: Hacker News / 4 months ago
  • CDC File Transfer
    Please bear in mind that there are [now] two distinct rsync codebases. The original is the GPL variant [today displaying "Upgrade required"]: https://rsync.samba.org/ The second is the BSD clone: https://www.openrsync.org/ The BSD... - Source: Hacker News / 12 months ago
  • Down the Rabbit Hole of creating a Home Lab
    Rsync - Fast file copying and syncing. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago

View more

Alternatives to drive-cli and rsync

When comparing drive-cli and rsync, you can also consider the following products.