Efficient Data Transfer
Rsync uses a delta-transfer algorithm which allows it to update files by only sending the differences between the source and destination, greatly reducing the amount of data transferred.
Bandwidth Throttling
Rsync provides an option to limit the bandwidth used during the transfer, helping to manage network resources and avoid congestion.
Compression
Rsync supports compression of data during transfer, which can further reduce the amount of data sent over the network.
Secure Transfer
Rsync can utilize SSH for secure data transfer, adding a layer of encryption to protect data as it moves between systems.
Versatile
Rsync can be used for a variety of tasks such as backups, mirroring, and synchronization, making it a versatile tool for different data management needs.
Preserves File Attributes
Rsync preserves file permissions, timestamps, ownerships, and symbolic links during the transfer, ensuring that all file attributes remain intact.
Widely Supported
Rsync is available on most Unix-like operating systems and there are ports available for Windows, making it accessible across different platforms.
Open Source
Rsync is free and open-source software, allowing anyone to use, modify, and distribute it without licensing fees.
Promote rsync. You can add any of these badges on your website.
We have collected here some useful links to help you find out if rsync is good.
Check the traffic stats of rsync on SimilarWeb. The key metrics to look for are: monthly visits, average visit duration, pages per visit, and traffic by country. Moreoever, check the traffic sources. For example "Direct" traffic is a good sign.
Check the "Domain Rating" of rsync on Ahrefs. The domain rating is a measure of the strength of a website's backlink profile on a scale from 0 to 100. It shows the strength of rsync's backlink profile compared to the other websites. In most cases a domain rating of 60+ is considered good and 70+ is considered very good.
Check the "Domain Authority" of rsync on MOZ. A website's domain authority (DA) is a search engine ranking score that predicts how well a website will rank on search engine result pages (SERPs). It is based on a 100-point logarithmic scale, with higher scores corresponding to a greater likelihood of ranking. This is another useful metric to check if a website is good.
The latest comments about rsync on Reddit. This can help you find out how popualr the product is and what people think about it.
Ubuntu's rsync is samba rsync. It's not part of the samba project per se, but it is made by the same guy and the official url is https://rsync.samba.org/ so it's entirely fair to call it samba rsync in my opinion. - Source: Hacker News / about 2 months ago
Please bear in mind that there are [now] two distinct rsync codebases. The original is the GPL variant [today displaying "Upgrade required"]: https://rsync.samba.org/ The second is the BSD clone: https://www.openrsync.org/ The BSD version would be used on platforms that are intolerant of later versions of the GPL (Apple, Android, etc.). - Source: Hacker News / 10 months ago
Rsync - Fast file copying and syncing. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
Does this apply to the GPL or BSD codebase? There are (now) two rsync codebases. GPL: https://rsync.samba.org/ BSD: https://www.openrsync.org/. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
Rsync can be used to synchronize a local disk to the pCloud drive p. Works similarly as the Sync option of the pCloud Drive app. May be useful if one prefers a bulk upload once a day over a continuous synchronization. Source: over 2 years ago
Tools that can be used to handle this include Rsync, Duplicati, Cohesity. - Source: dev.to / almost 3 years ago
To overcome this issue, you can use rsync, a powerful command-line tool for synchronizing files and directories, along with a bash script that excludes the node_modules folder and also filter out anything in a .gitignore file that you specify. In this article, I'll guide you through the process of setting up and using this bash script to sync your Node.js project while ignoring the node_modules folder. - Source: dev.to / about 3 years ago
Rsync will probably work better for this use case. Source: about 3 years ago
Give rsync a try, it should handle UTF filenames just fine. Source: over 3 years ago
~ Esp. For larger torrents, I think it's useful to use your file manager or something like rsync to manually copy the files, then move it in qBittorrent and afterwards you can remove the files yourself from the original location as to avoid your files from being lost? For me the 'move torrent' function in qBittorrent seems to be a bit quicker this way. Source: almost 4 years ago
Rclone is a bit like rsync, but aims to connect to any cloud storage provider, including Google Photos and Google Drive. I can "easily" download your files from the cloud provider, or upload files, or many other features. The interface is command-line, which can look intimidating for some users. Source: over 4 years ago
โข I then copy the contents of my main drive to a number of external hard drives (which also will be spinning disc and encrypted) using rsync. I'll keep most of these external drives at home but always make sure that I have at least one hard drive stored at a different location. From time to time, I'll swap this offsite hard drive with one of my newly backed up hard drives from home. Source: over 4 years ago
Https://rsync.samba.org is not only a file transfer tool, but it can synchronize directories locally or over the network using ssh, stunnel or its own protocol(you'll have to run rsync in daemon mode on one of the hosts for that). It can copy/update files that are missing on the target host and (optionally) it can delete files that have been deleted on the source, but are still present on the target. Source: almost 5 years ago
Before we can import the data into a local MySQL instance, we need to download the relevant part of the dump to the local machine. Our import script uses rsync with a set of pre-configured --include and --exclude options under the hood to do that. Overall, we can typically download only about 2 GB of data out of the 23 GB dump. - Source: dev.to / almost 5 years ago
Never used it myself, but I am pretty sure you can do this with syncthing. The other possibility that comes to mind is to use rsync and whatever scheduling facility your OS provides. Source: about 5 years ago
Hbarta@olive:~/Downloads/rsync$ rsync --version Rsync version 3.1.3 protocol version 31 Copyright (C) 1996-2018 by Andrew Tridgell, Wayne Davison, and others. Web site: http://rsync.samba.org/ Capabilities: 64-bit files, 64-bit inums, 64-bit timestamps, 64-bit long ints, socketpairs, hardlinks, symlinks, IPv6, batchfiles, inplace, append, ACLs, xattrs, iconv, symtimes, prealloc Rsync comes with... Source: about 5 years ago
I have also heard people talking about using other programs that have reduplication built in as a way to accomplish this, most notable rsync and also borg backup. These require a bit more confidence in one's skills than I have at the moment for the task at hand. Source: over 5 years ago
Rsync stands as a prominent tool in the landscape of file synchronization and backup solutions, especially within the domain of Linux and UNIX-like systems. Having been mentioned frequently across various technical articles and community discussions, its strengths and minor setbacks are well-documented amid comparisons with other solutions such as FreeFileSync, Syncthing, and GoodSync.
Rsync is lauded for its efficiency in performing both incremental and full backups. It allows users to update entire directory trees and file systems, conducting local as well as remote backups seamlessly. With its capability to synchronize files over the network, rsync proves invaluable for managing data across multiple hosts. Advanced users often leverage its powerful scripting and automation capabilities via command line interfaces, creating cron jobs customized to particular synchronization schedules or data protection policies. Community discussions also highlight rsyncโs ability to preserve file permissions, ownership, and links, making it a robust option for maintaining data integrity.
While rsync is predominantly recognized as a command-line tool, its accessibility is broadened through graphical user interfaces (GUIs) like Grsync. This eases the barrier for users unfamiliar with command-line operations, though the original user experience still caters predominantly to those comfortable with UNIX-like environments. Rsync's adaptability to different synchronization and backup scenarios is further enhanced by community-contributed scripts and tutorials, detailing diverse usage patterns such as excluding specific directories (e.g., node_modules) in development workflows.
Despite its strengths, some criticisms surrounding rsync are notable. Users report challenges such as replication errors when handling large volumes of files, and it notably struggles with open file handling during synchronization tasks. Its "bare-bones" design implies that while rsync is highly configurable, it lacks some advanced features present in other competitors (e.g., deduplication in Borg Backup) and may involve a steeper learning curve for those new to system administration.
The security track record of rsync requires attention to detail, especially considering its importance in data management strategies. Mentions of vulnerabilities discovered in different codebases prompt users to continually monitor updates and security advisories, ensuring configurations adhere to best practices for data security, especially when rsync functions as a daemon or across unsecured networks.
Within the sphere of file synchronization tools, rsync's simple yet potent capabilities are often preferred for straightforward, reliable data backup tasks. However, its perceived complexity and specific limitations might lead potential users towards alternatives such as Syncthing and Duplicati, which offer GUI-driven experiences and cloud integration features. Rclone's similar command-line interface, tailored for cloud storage connections, presents as a worthy alternative for tasks directly interfacing with cloud services.
In conclusion, rsync remains a stalwart choice for Linux and Unix users who appreciate control, scriptability, and efficient incremental backups. As long as users are mindful of its limitations and vulnerabilities, rsync can proficiently serve both simple and complex data synchronization needs in diverse technical environments.
Do you know an article comparing rsync to other products?
Suggest a link to a post with product alternatives.
Is rsync good? This is an informative page that will help you find out. Moreover, you can review and discuss rsync here. The primary details have not been verified within the last quarter, and they might be outdated. If you think we are missing something, please use the means on this page to comment or suggest changes. All reviews and comments are highly encouranged and appreciated as they help everyone in the community to make an informed choice. Please always be kind and objective when evaluating a product and sharing your opinion.
