Drata Reviews

GitHub MCP Server Reviews

Drata mentions (7)

• Interested in GRC?

  Have you had opportunity to apply any of the compliance automation tools like Drata in your work? Have you found them to be useful? Source: over 3 years ago

• Seeking critique before soft-launching our B2B SaaS product: Website feedback wanted!

  Have you got any experience from services like Drata (https://drata.com/)? Source: over 3 years ago

• SOC Compliance for Hardware/Software business

  Have a chat with the folks at https://drata.com/. Thier discovery and automated evidence gathering platform is pretty cool. Prepare for sticker shock though. Getting through any compliance process is a $30k ish annual expense. Source: over 3 years ago

• Security and Compliance Considerations for the Public Cloud

  Compliance tools like Vanta and Drata integrate with the major cloud providers and allow you to automatically monitor whether compliance criteria are being met. Because these tools can plug directly into the cloud provider APIs, they are able to pull relevant data automatically and send alerts when something is misconfigured. - Source: dev.to / about 4 years ago

• The Developer's Guide to SaaS Compliance

  Even if your organization has the practices down, you will still need to spend time maintaining and collecting evidence of compliance. Therefore, it’s beneficial to invest in automated software tools like Vanta or Drata that can speed up the evidence collection process. These tools help manage and record evidence of compliance practices via continuous monitoring of the application’s infrastructure and business... - Source: dev.to / about 4 years ago

GitHub MCP Server mentions (18)

• Do unused MCP tools cost you money?

  I have a small "GitHub summarizer" agent: one system prompt, one job — answer questions about my GitHub account by calling the GitHub MCP server. I duplicated its configuration (MAVERIK supports this directly — same model, same prompt, same everything) and changed one field on the copy: the set of attached MCP servers, adding deepwiki, microsoft-learn, and context7. Neither agent needs any of those three for the... - Source: dev.to / 11 days ago

• Every API Will Be Rebuilt for Agents

  GitHub's official MCP server is excellent — and GitHub is narrowing its default toolset and consolidating PR tools into fewer, more capable ones, explicitly to cut tool bloat and improve agent reasoning. The implication is hard to miss: even one of the best API companies on the planet is learning that a 1:1 mapping from product API to agent tools isn't the right shape. - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago

• Your AI Agent Has Push Access to Every Repo

  The official GitHub MCP server registers 83 tools. Most people set it up for reading code and managing issues. What they don't realise is they've also handed their agent the keys to:. - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago

• Helping Claude Do Its Best Work

  A lot of people use MCP servers to connect Claude to tools. I'm not generally a fan. MCP servers load a lot of information into context and often don't do everything that the API can. Last I looked, even the official Github MCP Server is guilty of this. I'd rather write tools directly, to my specifications. - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago

• Kiro showcase: Automating Changes Across Several Repos with Spec-Driven Development and Custom Sub-Agents

  Rather than manually searching through repositories, I used Kiro with the GitHub MCP server to:. - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago