
Drata
Vanta
Sprinto
Secureframe
OneTrust
Probo
UpGuard
Hyperproof
Cppcheck
Clang Static Analyzer
Coverity Scan
lgtm.com
SonarQube
VisualCodeGrepper
Flawfinder
Parasoft C/C++test
Drata
CppcheckCppcheck is recommended for C/C++ developers and development teams, particularly those responsible for maintaining large codebases or projects where code quality and reliability are paramount. It is also beneficial for educational purposes, where students and new developers can learn about potential pitfalls in C/C++ programming.
Cppcheck might be a bit more popular than Drata. We know about 10 links to it since March 2021 and only 7 links to Drata. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
Have you had opportunity to apply any of the compliance automation tools like Drata in your work? Have you found them to be useful? Source: over 3 years ago
Have you got any experience from services like Drata (https://drata.com/)? Source: over 3 years ago
Have a chat with the folks at https://drata.com/. Thier discovery and automated evidence gathering platform is pretty cool. Prepare for sticker shock though. Getting through any compliance process is a $30k ish annual expense. Source: over 3 years ago
Compliance tools like Vanta and Drata integrate with the major cloud providers and allow you to automatically monitor whether compliance criteria are being met. Because these tools can plug directly into the cloud provider APIs, they are able to pull relevant data automatically and send alerts when something is misconfigured. - Source: dev.to / about 4 years ago
Even if your organization has the practices down, you will still need to spend time maintaining and collecting evidence of compliance. Therefore, itโs beneficial to invest in automated software tools like Vanta or Drata that can speed up the evidence collection process. These tools help manage and record evidence of compliance practices via continuous monitoring of the applicationโs infrastructure and business... - Source: dev.to / about 4 years ago
I dedicated Sunday morning to going over the documentation of the linters we use in the project. The goal was to understand all options and use them in the best way for our project. Seeing their manuals side by side was nice because even very similar things are solved differently. Cppcheck is the most configurable and best documented; JSON Lint lies at the other end. - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
Using infer, someone else exploited null-dereference checks to introduce simple affine types in C++. Cppcheck also checks for null-dereferences. Unfortunately, that approach means that borrow-counting references have a larger sizeof than non-borrow counting references, so optimizing the count away potentially changes the semantics of a program which introduces a whole new way of writing subtly wrong code. Source: about 3 years ago
For my own projects, I used cppcheck. You can check out that tool to get a feel. Depending on what industry your in, you might need to follow a standard like Misra. Source: about 3 years ago
Https://cppcheck.sourceforge.io/ (there are many other static analysis tools, I just haven't used them or didn't care for them). Source: about 3 years ago
Sounds like something that could simply be communicated with the team that writes the tests. Unless you have dozens of such classes. In that case, you could just use e.g. Cppcheck and add a rule (regular expression) that searches for usages of the forbidden classes. Source: over 3 years ago
Vanta - Automate compliance, simplify security.
Clang Static Analyzer - The Clang Static Analyzer is a source code analysis tool that finds bugs in C, C++, and Objective-C...
Sprinto - SOC 2 security compliance for SaaS
Coverity Scan - Find and fix defects in your Java, C/C++ or C# open source project for free
Secureframe - Get enterprise ready with SOC 2 and ISO 27001 compliance
lgtm.com - lgtm.com is a platform for code analytics.