Software Alternatives & Startups

dpScreenOCR VS PureText

Compare dpScreenOCR VS PureText and see what are their differences

dpScreenOCR

Program to recognize text on screen

Rating
0 reviews
Pricing
Open source
PureText

Paste text that is plain text - without any formatting, using a custom hotkey.

Rating
0 reviews
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Which is more popular?

Based on our record, PureText should be more popular than dpScreenOCR. It has been mentioned 10 times since March 2021.

social mentions
4 vs 10
OCR popularity
100% vs 0%
alternatives listed
34 vs 42

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

dpScreenOCR
PureText
Website danpla.github.io stevemiller.net
Pricing
Open source
—
Listed in

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

dpScreenOCR 5 features
PureText 5 features
  • User-Friendly Interface
    dpScreenOCR offers a simple and intuitive user interface that makes it easy for users to capture and recognize text from their screen.
  • High Accuracy
    The tool provides high accuracy in optical character recognition, ensuring that the captured text closely matches the original content.
  • Support for Multiple Languages
    dpScreenOCR supports multiple languages, allowing users to recognize text in various languages seamlessly.
  • Fast Processing
    It processes screenshots quickly, enabling users to obtain text recognition results almost instantaneously.
  • Free to Use
    dpScreenOCR is available for free, making it accessible to a wide range of users without any cost barrier.

Possible disadvantages

  • Limited to Windows
    The software is only available for Windows operating systems, which may limit its accessibility for users on other platforms.
  • Requires Internet Connection
    While processing is fast, it may need an internet connection for certain features, which can be a limitation for users in offline environments.
  • Basic Feature Set
    The tool offers a basic set of features and might not cater to advanced OCR needs or provide additional functionalities such as batch processing.
  • Potential Privacy Concerns
    As with any screen capture tool, there may be privacy concerns depending on how the software handles data, though the specifics would need to be reviewed.
  • Simplicity
    PureText is straightforward and easy to use, allowing users to paste plain text without formatting with a simple keyboard shortcut.
  • Time-saving
    By eliminating the need to manually remove formatting, PureText can save users significant time when transferring text between different applications.
  • Low Resource Usage
    The program uses minimal system resources, making it suitable for use on a wide range of hardware without impacting performance.
  • Customization
    It allows customization of the keyboard shortcut, enabling users to set up the tool in a way that best fits their workflow.
  • Free to Use
    PureText is available for free, making it accessible to all users without any cost.

Possible disadvantages

  • Limited Features
    The software offers very basic functionality and does not include advanced text manipulation or formatting options.
  • Windows Only
    PureText is specific to the Windows operating system, which means it is not available for users on MacOS or Linux platforms.
  • No Updates or Support
    The development of the application appears limited, with infrequent updates and limited support options.
  • Potential Overwrite Risk
    Users must be cautious to avoid unintended overwriting of data when using the paste functionality without formatting.

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
dpScreenOCR
PureText
100% 100%
OCR
0% 0%
0% 0%
100% 100%
100% 100%
0% 0%
0% 0%
100% 100%

User comments

Share your experience with using dpScreenOCR and PureText. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

dpScreenOCR 4 mentions
PureText 10 mentions
  • My company disabled the copy to clipboard of ChatGPT
    Use this: https://danpla.github.io/dpscreenocr/ I set it on Ctrl+Q shortcut. It takes screenshot and transcribe text from the image. The text is automatically copied to clipboard for you. Its English OCR is top-notched. Its other... Source: over 3 years ago
  • Fast OCR to clipboard
    I use dpScreenOCR but I replace the included Tesseract trained data by the tessdata_best repo. Source: over 3 years ago
  • Feature Idea: OCR and image content detection in tracker-miner
    You may want to start more simply by helping dpscreenocr work on Wayland: https://danpla.github.io/dpscreenocr/ ,. Source: about 4 years ago

View more

  • Always paste without formatting on macOS
    Right, it’s in Powertoys, and alternatively this works well: https://stevemiller.net/puretext/. - Source: Hacker News / almost 3 years ago
  • Learn AutoHotKey by stealing my scripts
    For the record, it's also available without AutoHotKey, using Powertoys [1] or PureText [2]. Very useful. [1] https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/powertoys/ [2] https://stevemiller.net/puretext/. - Source: Hacker News / about 3 years ago
  • Is there a person who doesn't agree with this?
    I use https://stevemiller.net/puretext/ It's also on the windows store if your IT has you somewhat locked down but still able to access the store. Source: over 3 years ago

View more

Alternatives to dpScreenOCR and PureText

When comparing dpScreenOCR and PureText, you can also consider the following products.