Software Alternatives & Startups

Double Commander VS PostSharp

Compare Double Commander VS PostSharp and see what are their differences

Double Commander

Double Commander is a cross-platform open source file manager with two panels side by side.

Rating
0 reviews
Pricing
Open source
PostSharp

Add design patterns to C# and VB without boilerplate code with PostSharp. Choose from ready-made design patterns for C# and VB or create your own.

Rating
0 reviews
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Which is more popular?

Based on our record, Double Commander seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 24 times since March 2021.

social mentions
24 vs 0
File Manager popularity
100% vs 0%
alternatives listed
217 vs 2

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

Double Commander
PostSharp
Website doublecmd.sourceforge.io postsharp.net
Pricing
Open source
Listed in

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

Double Commander 7 features
PostSharp 5 features
  • Cross-Platform
    Double Commander is available for multiple operating systems including Windows, Linux, and macOS. This makes it a versatile choice for users operating across different platforms.
  • Free and Open Source
    Double Commander is free to download and its source code is open to the public. Users can modify and redistribute it under the GPL license, making it a cost-effective and customizable option.
  • Two-Panel Interface
    The application features a two-panel interface, which allows users to view and manage files in two distinct directories simultaneously. This enhances productivity and streamlines file operations.
  • Plugin Support
    Double Commander supports Total Commander WCX, WDX, and WLX plugins, providing additional functionalities such as extended file operations and viewing capabilities.
  • FTP/SFTP Support
    It includes built-in support for FTP and SFTP protocols, allowing users to easily manage files on remote servers.
  • Customizable User Interface
    Users can customize the layout, colors, and various other aspects of the interface to suit their individual preferences.
  • Advanced Search Function
    Double Commander offers an advanced search feature with various filters, allowing users to find files quickly and efficiently.

Possible disadvantages

  • Steeper Learning Curve
    The two-panel interface and multitude of features may be overwhelming for new users, leading to a steeper learning curve.
  • Occasional Bugs and Instability
    As an open-source project, Double Commander may occasionally suffer from bugs and stability issues, though these are often addressed by the community.
  • Less Polished UI
    The user interface, while customizable, may not be as polished or modern-looking as some commercial file managers.
  • Limited Integration
    Compared to some commercial options, Double Commander may offer limited integration with other applications and services out of the box.
  • Aspect-Oriented Programming (AOP)
    PostSharp allows developers to implement AOP in .NET projects, which helps in separating cross-cutting concerns like logging, error handling, or validation, making the code cleaner and easier to maintain.
  • Code Reusability
    By using aspects, developers can write code that can be easily reused across different parts of an application, reducing redundancy and improving efficiency.
  • Maintainability
    PostSharp helps to create a more modular codebase. With cross-cutting concerns handled separately, it becomes easier to manage and modify without affecting the core business logic.
  • Performance
    PostSharp weaves aspects into compiled code at build time, which generally leads to better runtime performance compared to other AOP approaches that might involve reflection or dynamic proxies.
  • Rich Library of Aspects
    It provides a comprehensive library of pre-built aspects like caching, threading, and security, which can accelerate development by reducing the need to implement common functionalities from scratch.

Possible disadvantages

  • Learning Curve
    For developers unfamiliar with AOP, there might be a steep learning curve to understand and effectively leverage PostSharp's capabilities.
  • Debugging Complexity
    The abstraction layer introduced by aspects can make debugging more challenging as it might not be immediately clear where certain behaviors or errors originate from.
  • Cost
    PostSharp is a commercial product with licensing fees, which might be a concern for small projects or organizations with limited budgets.
  • Build Time Overhead
    The process of weaving aspects into the code can increase the time taken for builds, which might be noticeable and frustrating for very large projects.
  • Vendor Lock-in
    Relying heavily on PostSharp-specific features might lead to challenges if there's a need to switch to a different AOP framework or if PostSharp's development ceases.

Analysis

An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.

Double Commander
PostSharp

Overall verdict

  • Overall, Double Commander is a well-regarded file manager that can significantly improve file organization and management tasks, especially for users who prefer a Total Commander-like experience on Linux, Windows, or macOS.

Why this product is good

  • Double Commander is considered good due to its open-source nature, cross-platform support, and feature-rich environment. It offers a dual-pane interface, which enhances productivity by allowing users to easily manage files across different directories. Features such as tabbed browsing, an advanced search function, and the built-in file viewer/editor support diverse file formats, making it a versatile tool. Many users appreciate its customization options and support for WCX, WDX, and WLX plug-ins.

Recommended for

  • Users looking for a free, open-source alternative to Total Commander.
  • Those who frequently work with multiple files and directories and require efficient file management.
  • Users who prefer cross-platform tools that offer consistency across operating systems.
  • Individuals who appreciate customization and support for plug-ins to extend functionality.

Overall verdict

  • PostSharp is a mature, well-established aspect-oriented programming (AOP) framework for .NET that helps developers reduce boilerplate code through compile-time weaving of cross-cutting concerns like logging, caching, validation, and thread safety. It's a solid choice for teams looking to enforce coding patterns and reduce repetitive code, though it comes with a learning curve and licensing costs for commercial use.

Why this product is good

  • Reduces boilerplate code by automating cross-cutting concerns like logging, caching, and INotifyPropertyChanged implementation
  • Compile-time weaving means better performance compared to runtime-based AOP solutions
  • Strong Visual Studio integration with real-time code visualization of aspects
  • Mature product with many years of development and a stable codebase
  • Includes pre-built pattern libraries for common scenarios (design by contract, multithreading, architecture validation)
  • Helps enforce consistent coding patterns across large teams and codebases
  • Good documentation and support from the vendor

Recommended for

  • Enterprise .NET development teams working on large codebases
  • Teams wanting to enforce architectural patterns and coding standards automatically
  • Projects requiring extensive logging, caching, or validation logic applied consistently
  • Developers familiar with aspect-oriented programming concepts
  • Organizations willing to invest in commercial tooling for productivity gains
  • Teams dealing with legacy code who want to add cross-cutting concerns without heavy refactoring
  • C# and VB.NET developers on the .NET Framework or .NET Core/5+ platforms

Videos

Walkthroughs and reviews on video.

Double Commander 2 videos + Add
PostSharp 3 videos + Add

Check Out Double Commander File Manager In Ubuntu 16.04

More videos

  • - Context menu suggestion for Double Commander

Aspect Oriented Programming with PostSharp | Pluralsight

More videos

  • - Less Boilerplate Code with Metalama by PostSharp
  • - Postsharp - Advanced Aspects Programming

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
Double Commander
PostSharp
100% 100%
0% 0%
0% 0%
100% 100%
100% 100%
0% 0%

User comments

Share your experience with using Double Commander and PostSharp. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Reviews and articles

External articles and on-site reviews we used to compare the two products.

Double Commander no reviews yet
PostSharp no reviews yet

We have no reviews of PostSharp yet. Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

Double Commander 24 mentions
PostSharp 0 mentions

View more

Tracking PostSharp since Mar 2021.

Alternatives to Double Commander and PostSharp

When comparing Double Commander and PostSharp, you can also consider the following products.