Does.qa VS HTTP Toolkit
Compare Does.qa VS HTTP Toolkit and see what are their differences
Scan Azure and AWS resources against 621 policy rules. Auto-remediate findings, track compliance frameworks, integrate via API.
featured
Does.qa
DogQ.io
Testpine
Cypress.io
TestSprite
Octomind.run
TestMu AI (Formerly LambdaTest)
ACCELQ
HTTP Toolkit
Proxyman.io
Charles Proxy
Surge for Mac
mitmproxy
Fiddler
Weer
James
DoesQA is Codeless test automation that's more powerful than code! Any team member can create complex automation tests easily, enabling QA to keep pace with development and build coverage while reducing costs.
DoesQA doesn't just make the easy stuff easier; our codeless test automation tool also supports API integrations, Visual Regression, Pa11y, Lighthouse, and many more.
You'll be able to create tests in minutes which would have taken months in code.
Does.qa HTTP ToolkitDoes.qa's answer
DoesQA simplifies test creation and improves reliability while keeping the tester in control. With unlimited concurrency as standard there's no faster way to create or run your tests.
Does.qa's answer
DoesQA is the only solution which supports branching tests, API requests and Lighthouse Audits. DoesQA was built by experienced SDETs to make testing simpler, faster and more cost-effective while allowing all the power which comes with a traditional code-based solution.
Does.qa's answer
Engineering teams who want powerful web end-to-end automation tests without the costs typically associated with building a test framework and running tests remotely.
Does.qa's answer
Everyone's endlessly wasting money building their own test framework.
Based on our record, HTTP Toolkit seems to be a lot more popular than Does.qa. While we know about 30 links to HTTP Toolkit, we've tracked only 1 mention of Does.qa. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
Hey, DoesQA here, we have a compatible set of steps as WebdriverIO but as a codeless test automation tool. Source: about 3 years ago
I can add certificates on my unrooted android. That how HTTPToolkit [0] works, it only requires adb, which (thankfully) doesn't trip banking apps. Banking apps can (and do iirc) pin certificates, so a rooted phone adds no risk whatsoever. Also in my experience a rooted phone experience is by far more secure than the OEM androids. Security is supposed to assess risk objectively, yet "running on a Xiaomi phone with... - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago
For my rather simple needs I've been using https://httptoolkit.com free edition, I like that it launches a independent Firefox window on its own for the intercepting so I don't have to touch my working browser or deal with configuring a proxy anywhere. - Source: Hacker News / 7 months ago
This one is truly a gem: https://httptoolkit.com It even bypasses SSL pinning on Android using 1 click. - Source: Hacker News / 7 months ago
Https://httptoolkit.com also worth a look if you're interested in this space: has some neat automated setup for Android MITM that can be much simpler _and_ more effective than the manual config route (with automated Frida setup on rooted devices, so it handles unpinning too!). More UI & less CLI focused, so depends which way your preferences go there. - Source: Hacker News / 12 months ago
Just setup httptoolkit [0], it just works. [0] - https://httptoolkit.com/. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
DogQ.io - No-code tests in cloud for web developers with all skill levels
Proxyman.io - Proxyman is a high-performance macOS app, which enables developers to view HTTP/HTTPS requests from apps and domains.
Testpine - No Code Test Automation for Web & Mobile and Test Management
Charles Proxy - HTTP proxy / HTTP monitor / Reverse Proxy
Cypress.io - Slow, difficult and unreliable testing for anything that runs in a browser. Install Cypress in seconds and take the pain out of front-end testing.
Surge for Mac - Advanced Web Debugging Proxy for Mac & iOS