Docker Swarm VS StackGres

Compare Docker Swarm VS StackGres and see what are their differences

you.bot

One API for 80+ AI models — LLM, image, video & music — priced up to 80% below the official APIs. Pay only for successful calls; failed runs refunded; credits never expire. featured

Contents:

» Base Details
» Videos
» Reviews
» Alternatives

Docker Swarm

Native clustering for Docker. Turn a pool of Docker hosts into a single, virtual host.

StackGres

Fully-featured platform for running PostgreSQL on Kubernetes

Landing page //
2022-11-01

Landing page //
2022-05-20

Docker Swarm

Website: github.com
Pricing URL: -

Edit details

StackGres

Website: stackgres.io
Pricing URL: Official StackGres Pricing

Edit details

Docker Swarm features and specs

Simplicity
Docker Swarm is easy to set up and use, especially for those already familiar with Docker. It integrates seamlessly into the Docker ecosystem, providing a straightforward solution for container orchestration without the need for additional tools.
Native Docker Integration
Swarm is built into Docker, meaning that Docker users do not need to install or configure another orchestration tool. This provides a consistent experience from development to production.
Declarative Service Model
Swarm allows users to define the desired state of their services, and the system works to maintain that state. This includes scaling services up or down, and handling load balancing.
Easy Scaling
Docker Swarm makes it easy to scale applications horizontally by simply changing the number of replicas of a service. The platform manages the distribution of these replicas across the available nodes.
Built-in Load Balancing
Swarm includes built-in load balancing, distributing incoming client requests to running containers based on task states and node availability.

Possible disadvantages of Docker Swarm

Limited Ecosystem
Compared to Kubernetes, Docker Swarm has a more limited ecosystem of plugins, extensions, and third-party integrations. This can make it less flexible for complex or custom setups.
Less Feature-Rich
Although sufficient for many use cases, Swarm lacks some advanced features that other orchestrators like Kubernetes offer, such as custom scheduling policies, complex networking configurations, and a broader range of storage options.
Community and Support
The Docker Swarm community is smaller and less active compared to Kubernetes. This affects the available support, community-contributed tools, and overall development pace.
Scaling Limits
While Docker Swarm can handle small to medium-sized clusters efficiently, it may not perform as well as Kubernetes in very large-scale deployments, particularly in terms of resource management and fault tolerance.
Future Uncertainty
With Docker's increasing focus on Kubernetes, the long-term future of Docker Swarm is uncertain. This raises concerns about investing in a technology that might not be as actively developed or supported in the future.

StackGres features and specs

Integrated PostgreSQL Management
StackGres provides a comprehensive suite for managing PostgreSQL clusters, simplifying configuration, deployment, and maintenance.
Scalability
StackGres supports dynamic scaling of PostgreSQL clusters, allowing for flexible resource allocation based on workload demands.
Kubernetes Native
Built on Kubernetes, StackGres leverages its powerful orchestration capabilities for high availability and container management.
Security Features
Includes advanced security features like SSL/TLS, authentication, and role-based access control to safeguard data and connections.
Monitoring and Alerting
Comes with integrated monitoring and alerting tools, providing insights into database performance and health metrics.

Possible disadvantages of StackGres

Complexity
The Kubernetes-based environment can introduce complexity for users unfamiliar with container orchestration and management.
Resource Intensive
Running StackGres requires significant computational resources, which might be overkill for small-scale or less demanding applications.
Learning Curve
New users may face a steep learning curve in mastering StackGres for effective management of PostgreSQL in a Kubernetes environment.
Cost Considerations
While powerful, using Kubernetes and associated resources for StackGres can lead to higher operational costs.
Dependency on Kubernetes
Requires a functional Kubernetes cluster, which might be a barrier for organizations not currently using Kubernetes.

Analysis of Docker Swarm

Overall verdict

Docker Swarm is a good choice for small to medium-sized deployments where ease of setup and tight integration with Docker are priorities. However, for larger, more complex environments or when advanced features like custom scheduling and multi-cloud support are necessary, other orchestration tools like Kubernetes might be more appropriate.

Why this product is good

Docker Swarm is considered good for users who need a simple, integrated tool for managing containers across a cluster of hosts. Its main strengths include seamless integration with Docker, easy setup, and support for multi-host networking and scaling of services. Swarm is a part of Docker, and therefore it benefits from Docker's comprehensive ecosystem, tooling, and documentation. It is particularly suitable for scenarios where a lightweight and straightforward orchestration solution is desired.

Recommended for

Developers who are already familiar with Docker and want minimal learning curve for orchestration.
Small to medium-sized teams looking for easy-to-use, efficient management of containerized applications.
Environments where tight integration with Docker CLI and ecosystem is preferred over advanced orchestration capabilities.

Docker Swarm videos

+ Add

Kubernetes vs Docker Swarm | Container Orchestration War | Kubernetes Training | Edureka

StackGres videos

No StackGres videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Docker Swarm and StackGres)

StackGres

Developer Tools

81 81%

Developer Tools

19% 19

Cloud Computing

0 0%

Cloud Computing

100% 100

DevOps Tools

85 85%

DevOps Tools

15% 15

Containers As A Service

100 100%

Containers As A Service

0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Docker Swarm and StackGres. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Docker Swarm and StackGres

Docker Swarm Reviews

Top 12 Kubernetes Alternatives to Choose From in 2023

With Docker Swarm, you can create and manage a cluster of Docker nodes, enabling the deployment and scaling of containerized applications across a distributed environment.

Source: humalect.com

11 Best Rancher Alternatives Multi Cluster Orchestration Platform

Next, we have Docker Swarm on our alternatives to rancher list. Docker Swarm is a lightweight container orchestration tool that lets you create, deploy and manage containerized applications. It is even one of the most popular container orchestration tools after Kubernetes.

Source: technicalustad.com

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes: how to choose a container orchestration tool

Docker Swarm is an open-source container orchestration platform built and maintained by Docker. Under the hood, Docker Swarm converts multiple Docker instances into a single virtual host. A Docker Swarm cluster generally contains three items:

Source: circleci.com

StackGres Reviews

We have no reviews of StackGres yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, StackGres should be more popular than Docker Swarm. It has been mentiond 10 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Docker Swarm mentions (3)

Ask HN: Why did K8s win against Docker Swarm?
Docker Swarm Classic (https://github.com/docker-archive/classicswarm) is dead. Docker Swarm Mode is alive, and I know some people use it, but it's very niche compared to k8s. As someone who interacts with k8s regularly, I often feel like there is a place for a simpler k8s alternative. But looking at history I see the attempts like Swarm fail. What do you think played the decisive role in the k8s victory? Features,... - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
K8s vs Docker Swarm
So the thing is support for Swarm was delegated to Mirantis, https://www.mirantis.com/blog/mirantis-will-continue-to-support-and-develop-docker-swarm/ since it was delegated very little was done to move forward swarm _> https://github.com/moby/swarmkit/commits/master , docker swarm itself (docker the company) is deprecated https://github.com/docker-archive/classicswarm . I think because there's no way to... Source: about 3 years ago
#30DaysOfAppwrite: Docker Swarm Integration
Docker Swarm is a container orchestration tool built right into the Docker CLI which allows us to deploy our Docker services to a cluster of hosts, instead of just the one allowed with Docker Compose. This is known as Swarm Mode, not to be confused with the classic Docker Swarm that is no longer being developed as a standalone product. Docker Swarm works great with Appwrite as it builds upon the Compose... - Source: dev.to / about 5 years ago

StackGres mentions (10)

TimescaleDB compresses time-series data
At StackGres [1] we find Timescale to be one of the most used extensions. Timescale is quite a successful project! StackGres is actually the first solution recommended by Timescale for self-hosting with Kubernetes operators [2]. So if you are into Kubernetes (or if not, consider it, using something like K3s [3] is quite straightforward and lightweight on resources), this is probably a great option to self-host... - Source: Hacker News / about 2 months ago
Show HN: SQL-tap – Real-time SQL traffic viewer for PostgreSQL and MySQL
* Latency. Yes, yes, yes, they add "microseconds" vs "milliseconds for queries", and that's true, but just part of the story. There's an extra hop. There's two extra sets of TCP layers being traversed. If the hop is local (say a sidecar, as we do in StackGres) it adds complexity in its deployment and management (something we solved by automation, but was an extra problem to solve) and consumes resources. If it's a... - Source: Hacker News / 6 months ago
Application Less Containers
This is conceptually similar to what we did for Postgres extensions at the StackGres [1] project. I gave a talk at a Kubecon about it [2]. However, this scheme is not perfect. Some Kubernetes security solutions enforce immutable containers, and once the agent pulls any additional file into the container, it will be flagged. It's also harder to reason about the security of the image (think CVEs, etc), given that... - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
Pg_lakehouse: Query Any Data Lake from Postgres
I applaud the decision to use AGPL-3.0. For me, it's a license that provides forward guarantees to the Community: no proprietary forks can happen, so any fork will be an OSS fork from which the upstream project may benefit too, which benefits all users. That's the reason we chose this license for StackGres [1], another project in the Postgres space. [1]: https://stackgres.io. - Source: Hacker News / about 2 years ago
Keycloak with PostgreSQL on Kubernetes
This is good and interesting recipe to get Keycloak and Postgres on Kubernetes. There is an important improvement, though: the Postgres deployed here is not production ready (high availability, backups, monitoring, etc). We run Keycloak on StackGres [1] which gives us production-ready Postgres setup (disclaimer: it's dogfooding). Happy to share the YAML manifests used to deploy Keycloak with StackGres. Maybe we... - Source: Hacker News / over 3 years ago