Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Docker Swarm VS Puter

Compare Docker Swarm VS Puter and see what are their differences

Bunny.net
BunnyCDN is a simple and powerful CDN, offering lightning fast performance for a fraction of the cost with free SSL, Brotli, HTTP/2 and 100% Pay As You Go pricing. sponsored
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. ยป Base Details
  2. ยป Videos
  3. ยป Reviews
  4. ยป Alternatives

Docker Swarm logo Docker Swarm

Native clustering for Docker. Turn a pool of Docker hosts into a single, virtual host.

Puter logo Puter

Puter is a cloud operating system. Store, open, and edit your files from anywhere at any time in the cloud.
  • Docker Swarm Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-11-01
  • Puter Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-01-03

Docker Swarm features and specs

  • Simplicity
    Docker Swarm is easy to set up and use, especially for those already familiar with Docker. It integrates seamlessly into the Docker ecosystem, providing a straightforward solution for container orchestration without the need for additional tools.
  • Native Docker Integration
    Swarm is built into Docker, meaning that Docker users do not need to install or configure another orchestration tool. This provides a consistent experience from development to production.
  • Declarative Service Model
    Swarm allows users to define the desired state of their services, and the system works to maintain that state. This includes scaling services up or down, and handling load balancing.
  • Easy Scaling
    Docker Swarm makes it easy to scale applications horizontally by simply changing the number of replicas of a service. The platform manages the distribution of these replicas across the available nodes.
  • Built-in Load Balancing
    Swarm includes built-in load balancing, distributing incoming client requests to running containers based on task states and node availability.

Possible disadvantages of Docker Swarm

  • Limited Ecosystem
    Compared to Kubernetes, Docker Swarm has a more limited ecosystem of plugins, extensions, and third-party integrations. This can make it less flexible for complex or custom setups.
  • Less Feature-Rich
    Although sufficient for many use cases, Swarm lacks some advanced features that other orchestrators like Kubernetes offer, such as custom scheduling policies, complex networking configurations, and a broader range of storage options.
  • Community and Support
    The Docker Swarm community is smaller and less active compared to Kubernetes. This affects the available support, community-contributed tools, and overall development pace.
  • Scaling Limits
    While Docker Swarm can handle small to medium-sized clusters efficiently, it may not perform as well as Kubernetes in very large-scale deployments, particularly in terms of resource management and fault tolerance.
  • Future Uncertainty
    With Docker's increasing focus on Kubernetes, the long-term future of Docker Swarm is uncertain. This raises concerns about investing in a technology that might not be as actively developed or supported in the future.

Puter features and specs

  • User-friendly Interface
    Puter offers an intuitive and easy-to-navigate interface that makes it simple for users of all technical levels to interact with the platform effectively.
  • Comprehensive Features
    The platform provides a wide range of features that cater to diverse user needs, ensuring that all necessary functionalities are at the userโ€™s fingertips.
  • Reliable Performance
    Puter is known for its robust performance with minimal downtime, ensuring users can rely on it for critical operations without disruptions.
  • Strong Support
    Offers excellent customer support with knowledgeable staff who provide timely assistance and problem resolution.
  • Frequent Updates
    Regularly provides updates that introduce new features and enhancements to keep the software current and useful for modern needs.

Possible disadvantages of Puter

  • High Cost
    Puter can be expensive compared to similar platforms, which may be a barrier for smaller organizations or individual users.
  • Steep Learning Curve
    While the interface is user-friendly, some of the more advanced features require a significant amount of time and effort to master effectively.
  • Limited Customization
    The platform offers limited opportunities for customization, which may be a drawback for users looking for highly personalized solutions.
  • Resource Intensive
    Puter might require more computing resources, which can slow down performance on older hardware or less powerful systems.
  • Occasional Bugs
    Despite its reliability, users sometimes encounter bugs, particularly following updates, that can temporarily hinder functionality.

Analysis of Docker Swarm

Overall verdict

  • Docker Swarm is a good choice for small to medium-sized deployments where ease of setup and tight integration with Docker are priorities. However, for larger, more complex environments or when advanced features like custom scheduling and multi-cloud support are necessary, other orchestration tools like Kubernetes might be more appropriate.

Why this product is good

  • Docker Swarm is considered good for users who need a simple, integrated tool for managing containers across a cluster of hosts. Its main strengths include seamless integration with Docker, easy setup, and support for multi-host networking and scaling of services. Swarm is a part of Docker, and therefore it benefits from Docker's comprehensive ecosystem, tooling, and documentation. It is particularly suitable for scenarios where a lightweight and straightforward orchestration solution is desired.

Recommended for

  • Developers who are already familiar with Docker and want minimal learning curve for orchestration.
  • Small to medium-sized teams looking for easy-to-use, efficient management of containerized applications.
  • Environments where tight integration with Docker CLI and ecosystem is preferred over advanced orchestration capabilities.

Docker Swarm videos

+ Add

Kubernetes vs Docker Swarm | Container Orchestration War | Kubernetes Training | Edureka

More videos:

  • Review - Roberto Fuentes โ€“ NodeJS with Docker Swarm

Puter videos

No Puter videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Docker Swarm and Puter)

Docker Swarm

Puter

Developer Tools
100 100%
Developer Tools
0% 0
Cloud Storage
0 0%
Cloud Storage
100% 100
DevOps Tools
100 100%
DevOps Tools
0% 0
File Sharing
0 0%
File Sharing
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Docker Swarm and Puter. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Docker Swarm and Puter

Docker Swarm Reviews

Top 12 Kubernetes Alternatives to Choose From in 2023
With Docker Swarm, you can create and manage a cluster of Docker nodes, enabling the deployment and scaling of containerized applications across a distributed environment.
Source: humalect.com
11 Best Rancher Alternatives Multi Cluster Orchestration Platform
Next, we have Docker Swarm on our alternatives to rancher list. Docker Swarm is a lightweight container orchestration tool that lets you create, deploy and manage containerized applications. It is even one of the most popular container orchestration tools after Kubernetes.
Source: technicalustad.com
Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes: how to choose a container orchestration tool
Docker Swarm is an open-source container orchestration platform built and maintained by Docker. Under the hood, Docker Swarm converts multiple Docker instances into a single virtual host. A Docker Swarm cluster generally contains three items:
Source: circleci.com

Puter Reviews

We have no reviews of Puter yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Puter should be more popular than Docker Swarm. It has been mentiond 12 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Docker Swarm mentions (3)

  • Ask HN: Why did K8s win against Docker Swarm?
    Docker Swarm Classic (https://github.com/docker-archive/classicswarm) is dead. Docker Swarm Mode is alive, and I know some people use it, but it's very niche compared to k8s. As someone who interacts with k8s regularly, I often feel like there is a place for a simpler k8s alternative. But looking at history I see the attempts like Swarm fail. What do you think played the decisive role in the k8s victory? Features,... - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago
  • K8s vs Docker Swarm
    So the thing is support for Swarm was delegated to Mirantis, https://www.mirantis.com/blog/mirantis-will-continue-to-support-and-develop-docker-swarm/ since it was delegated very little was done to move forward swarm _> https://github.com/moby/swarmkit/commits/master , docker swarm itself (docker the company) is deprecated https://github.com/docker-archive/classicswarm . I think because there's no way to... Source: over 3 years ago
  • #30DaysOfAppwrite: Docker Swarm Integration
    Docker Swarm is a container orchestration tool built right into the Docker CLI which allows us to deploy our Docker services to a cluster of hosts, instead of just the one allowed with Docker Compose. This is known as Swarm Mode, not to be confused with the classic Docker Swarm that is no longer being developed as a standalone product. Docker Swarm works great with Appwrite as it builds upon the Compose... - Source: dev.to / about 5 years ago

Puter mentions (12)

  • After 2 years of hard work, Puter finally enters beta!
    I'm extremely excited to announce that Puter which was first announced on this subreddit is now in beta. Source: about 3 years ago
  • Copycat
    How did you make puter.com run a file,what format does it need to be in. Source: about 3 years ago
  • What happens when you reach #1 on Hacker News
    Around two months ago my startup Puter hit #1 on Hacker News. Source: over 3 years ago
  • My personal "OS in the browser" is nearly POSIX-compliant!
    If puter.com becomes a subscription service, then it will have a revenue stream separate from advertising. If the service is free, then the users are the product (attention being sold to the highest advertising bidder). Source: over 3 years ago
  • Cloud Based Desktop Environment
    Thanks! None is exactly what I'm looking for, but they look very processing. I actually found another one after I wrote the post called Puter https://puter.com/ that looks interesting, but it's in alpha. Source: almost 4 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Docker Swarm and Puter, you can also consider the following products

Kubernetes - Kubernetes is an open source orchestration system for Docker containers

daedalOS - daedalOS is a recreation of the desktop environment experience on the web.https://dustinbrett.com/

Rancher - Open Source Platform for Running a Private Container Service

Windows 96 - Windows 96 is a recreation of Windows 98 in the browser.

Docker Compose - Define and run multi-container applications with Docker

Google Chrome - Google Chrome is a fast, secure, and free web browser, built for the modern web. Give it a try on your desktop today.

Loading...