DirLister VS Smart HTTPS

• Open Source
  DirLister is hosted on GitHub, allowing users to freely access, modify, and contribute to the source code, fostering a collaborative development environment.
• Directory Listing
  DirLister provides a convenient way to list directory contents, making it useful for quickly generating an overview of files and folders.
• Cross-Platform
  Being implemented in a scripting or a universally compatible language, DirLister can potentially be used across different operating systems, enhancing its versatility.
• Customization
  Users can modify DirLister’s code to tailor the directory listing format and output to meet specific needs or integrate with other tools.

Possible disadvantages

• Limited Features
  DirLister may be basic and lack advanced features compared to more comprehensive file management tools or scripts, limiting its functionality.
• User Expertise
  Users may need some technical expertise to effectively modify and deploy DirLister, especially for customization purposes.
• Maintenance
  As an open-source project, its updates and maintenance depend on community interest and contribution, which might be inconsistent.
• Security Risks
  Like any open-source software, it could have undiscovered vulnerabilities that need to be handled with care, particularly in sensitive environments.

• Automatic Redirection to HTTPS
  Smart HTTPS automatically changes HTTP protocol to HTTPS, which enhances the security of your browsing by ensuring that the connection is encrypted.
• Fallback to HTTP
  In cases where an HTTPS version of the site is not available, it can automatically revert back to HTTP, ensuring you can still access the website instead of facing a disruption.
• Whitelist Feature
  Allows users to maintain a whitelist of websites that should always be accessed using HTTP, providing flexibility and control over the browsing experience.
• Improved Privacy
  By automatically using HTTPS, it helps in protecting user data from eavesdroppers and enhances privacy while browsing the web.

Possible disadvantages

• Compatibility Issues
  Some websites may not function correctly over HTTPS, leading to potential misbehavior or broken features when accessed using Smart HTTPS.
• Potential for Increased Loading Times
  Sometimes, redirecting to HTTPS can result in slightly longer loading times, especially if the server's configuration is not optimal for HTTPS.
• Resource Intensive
  The addon might consume additional resources to check for HTTPS versions of every site, which could impact browser performance, especially on older systems.
• Limited Control Over Redirection
  Users might have limited ability to control which sites are redirected to HTTPS if they haven't preemptively whitelisted specific HTTP sites.

Tracking DirLister since Mar 2021.

• “We don’t track you … except for when we get paid for it.”

  Smart HTTPS, site This tries to send you to https sites instead of http sites. Using http sites makes you venerable to man in the middle attacks. (dont use http on public wifis if possible). Source: over 4 years ago

• question about non secure websites

  I'd recommend using Smart HTTPS which automatically makes your site's HTTPS if it can offer it so it will reduce these situations. Here's the site where you can choose whichever browser you use. https://mybrowseraddon.com/smart-https.html. Source: over 4 years ago