Digraph.dev VS Enfilade.guide

Enfilade.guide's answer:

Enfilade rates museums, not just lists them. Every entry has an editorial judgement of museum value on a five-step scale, a short account of what actually matters inside, an essential route with realistic timings, and practical details where each fact carries its source and the date it was last checked. Four languages, one editorial voice.

Enfilade.guide's answer:

Because it answers the question the big platforms avoid: is this museum worth my time, and how long do I need? There is no advertising, no affiliate ticket sales, no accounts, no cookies and no third-party tracking, so nothing on the page is trying to sell you anything. When a museum's own website leaves a gap, we write to the museum and print what they answer.

Enfilade.guide's answer:

People who travel for museums rather than pass through them: independent travellers planning a day in Paris, Vienna, Budapest, Moscow or Delft, and locals who want to know which of the smaller museums in their own city deserve an afternoon.

Enfilade.guide's answer:

It began as one person's notes on which museums had been worth the visit and which had not the kind of judgement guidebooks used to make and travel platforms no longer do. The notes became a catalogue, the catalogue grew a method (rating, essential route, sourced and dated facts), and the method now covers fourteen cities in seven countries, with new cities added as they are checked.

Enfilade.guide's answer:

Plain PHP and MySQL, no frameworks; server-rendered HTML that works with JavaScript switched off; self-hosted fonts and images; the whole entry page weighs under a megabyte. A crawler of our own watches museum websites for changes. The ratings, the editing and the fact-checking are done by people.

Enfilade.guide's answer:

None — Enfilade is free to read, has no paying customers and no advertisers.