Software Alternatives & Startups
Register | Login

Delighted VS cppq

Compare Delighted VS cppq and see what are their differences

Delighted

The fastest and easiest way to gather actionable feedback from your customers

Rating
0 reviews
Pricing
Freemium Free trial $224 / Monthly (10,000 send limit, 5 projects, 10 users, 35+)
Alternatives Is it good?
cppq

Simple, reliable & efficient distributed task queue for C++

Rating
0 reviews
Alternatives Is it good?
CodeeSuite
CodeeSuite gives hotels, restaurants and venues everything they need to create QR codes, digital menus and smart screens — and to track how they perform — from one dashboard. sponsored
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Which is more popular?

Based on our record, Delighted seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 2 times since March 2021.

social mentions
2 vs 0
Customer Feedback popularity
100% vs 0%

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

Delighted
cppq
Website delighted.com github.com
Pricing
Freemium Free trial $224 / Monthly (10,000 send limit, 5 projects, 10 users, 35+) Official pricing
—
Company 2013 —
Listed in
Customer Feedback Surveys User Feedback Customer Experience Management Customer Experience Employee Feedback Net Promoter Product Market Fit Customer Support +6
—

About Delighted and cppq

In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.

Delighted
cppq

Deliver customer feedback and employee experience surveys across various channels. Control when and where surveys are delivered for point-in-time feedback at key points in the customer journey and employee lifecycle. No code required.

Read more about Delighted

No description of cppq yet.

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

Delighted 11 features
cppq 5 features
  • Survey Distribution via Email, Web, Link, SDK and Kiosk
  • Prebuilt Reports and Trend Reports
    Yes
  • AI Suggested Filters
    Yes
  • Customize Branding
    Yes
  • Survey Types: NPS, CSAT, CES, 5-Star, Thumbs, Smiley, eNPS, PMF
  • Send Survey from Your Domain
    Yes
  • 30+ Languages
  • Autopilot to Schedule Delivery
    Yes
  • Survey Templates
    Yes
  • Additional Questions
    Yes
  • Testimonials
  • Lightweight C++ implementation
    cppq is written in modern C++ and designed to be a minimal, efficient task queue library, making it a good fit for performance-sensitive applications where the overhead of scripting language runtimes is undesirable.
  • Redis-backed reliability
    Built on top of Redis as the message broker, cppq benefits from Redis's persistence, atomic operations, and wide adoption, giving the queue system durability and the ability to survive process restarts.
  • Inspired by proven design (asynq)
    The library's architecture mirrors the popular Go asynq task queue, so it inherits a well-thought-out API design for task enqueueing, retries, and worker processing patterns that have already been validated in production systems.
  • Native integration for C++ projects
    For teams already working in a C++ codebase, cppq allows adding background job processing without needing to introduce a separate service written in another language (like Go or Python), simplifying the technology stack.
  • Open source and inspectable
    Being open source on GitHub, developers can review the source code, modify it for custom needs, and contribute improvements, which offers transparency not available with closed-source queueing solutions.

Possible disadvantages

  • Limited maturity and battle-testing
    Compared to established task queue libraries like Sidekiq, Celery, or asynq itself, cppq is a newer and smaller project with less real-world production usage, which may translate into undiscovered bugs or edge cases.
  • Smaller community and ecosystem
    Because it has far fewer users and contributors than mainstream task queue systems, finding community support, third-party tutorials, or pre-built integrations is more difficult.
  • Documentation gaps
    As a smaller project, cppq may have less comprehensive documentation compared to major task queue frameworks, requiring developers to read source code directly to understand advanced features or edge-case behaviors.
  • C++ build and dependency complexity
    Using cppq requires managing C++ build toolchains and dependencies (such as a Redis client library), which can be more cumbersome than installing a package via pip or npm in other ecosystems.
  • Fewer built-in features and tooling
    cppq likely lacks the extensive ecosystem tooling of more mature queues, such as web-based monitoring dashboards, extensive metrics/observability integrations, or advanced scheduling features found in more established solutions.

Analysis

An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.

Delighted
cppq

Overall verdict

  • Yes, Delighted is generally considered a good tool for collecting customer feedback and measuring customer satisfaction.

Why this product is good

  • Delighted is known for its simplicity and effectiveness in gathering Net Promoter Score (NPS) data. It offers a user-friendly interface, easy integration with various platforms, and real-time feedback collection. Delighted helps businesses understand customer sentiment and improve their products or services based on the feedback received.

Recommended for

  • Businesses looking to implement NPS surveys quickly and efficiently
  • Companies seeking real-time feedback from customers
  • Organizations that want to integrate feedback tools with existing platforms like Slack, Salesforce, and Shopify
  • Small to medium-sized businesses aiming for a cost-effective customer feedback solution

Overall verdict

  • cppq is a lightweight, Redis-backed distributed task queue for C++ inspired by Go's popular 'asynq' library. It's a good choice for developers who need a simple, dependency-light job queue system in C++ without the overhead of larger enterprise messaging systems, though it's a smaller, less battle-tested project compared to mature alternatives.

Why this product is good

  • Simple and lightweight design makes it easy to understand and integrate into existing C++ projects
  • Built on Redis, a well-established and reliable backend for queue storage, giving it a solid foundation
  • Inspired by asynq (a proven Go library), so the design patterns and task queue semantics are based on a well-thought-out model
  • Open source on GitHub, allowing developers to inspect, modify, and contribute to the code
  • Good fit for projects already using Redis, minimizing the need for additional infrastructure
  • Straightforward API for enqueueing and processing background jobs in C++ applications

Recommended for

  • C++ developers needing a background job/task queue without adopting a heavyweight message broker
  • Projects already using Redis as part of their infrastructure
  • Small to medium-sized applications requiring asynchronous task processing
  • Teams comfortable working with less mainstream or smaller open-source libraries and willing to contribute or debug issues themselves
  • Developers familiar with asynq (Go) looking for a similar pattern in C++
  • Prototyping or hobby projects where a minimal task queue solution is sufficient

Videos

Walkthroughs and reviews on video.

Delighted 2 videos + Add
cppq 0 videos + Add

Delighted used by Bonobos

More videos

  • - NPS Setup in 15 Seconds

No cppq videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
Delighted
cppq
100% 100%
Customer Feedback
0% 0%
100% 100%
Surveys
0% 0%
100% 100%
User Feedback
0% 0%
100% 100%
Forms And Surveys
0% 0%

User comments

Share your experience with using Delighted and cppq. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Reviews and articles

External articles and on-site reviews we used to compare the two products.

Delighted no reviews yet
cppq no reviews yet

We have no reviews of cppq yet. Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

Delighted 2 mentions
cppq 0 mentions
  • MSP Feedback Survey / Net Promoter - Third Party Executed
    We've used https://delighted.com and been pretty happy with it. It's sent to customers during "key intersects" (onboarding, after projects, etc.) and after events. The results stream into Teams and we also track/analyze them to improve... Source: almost 5 years ago
  • Creating a simpler NPS, CSAT, CES service like Delighted?
    After seeing a business idea newsletter mention a SaaS that help monitor you NPS score, I decided to look a little more into it. There are a LOT of solutions out there, but they're also wildly expensive since I assume they're targeting... Source: over 5 years ago

Tracking cppq since Nov 2022.

Alternatives to Delighted and cppq

When comparing Delighted and cppq, you can also consider the following products.

Loading...