Software Alternatives & Startups
Register | Login

Deadpendency VS ShelfCount.win

Compare Deadpendency VS ShelfCount.win and see what are their differences

Deadpendency

Automated software dependency project health tracking

Rating
0 reviews
Promote on VibeVoted
Alternatives Is it good?
ShelfCount.win

Counts, recipe costing, purchase orders, invoice scanning, and real COGS for $50/month flat. Built by a restaurant owner. 14-day free trial — nothing charged until it ends, cancel in one click.

Rating
0 reviews
Pricing
Paid Free trial $50 / Monthly (Flat rate, unlimited users and locations)
Promote on VibeVoted
Alternatives Is it good?
Kechie
Kechie Inventory Management sponsored
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Which is more popular?

Based on our record, Deadpendency seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 2 times since March 2021.

social mentions
2 vs 0
Software Development popularity
100% vs 0%

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

Deadpendency
ShelfCount.win
Website deadpendency.com getshelfcount.com
Pricing
Official pricing
Paid Free trial $50 / Monthly (Flat rate, unlimited users and locations) Official pricing
Platforms —
Web
Listed in
Dependency Management Software Development Security
Restaurants Restaurant Management Restaurant Management Software Inventory Management +1

About Deadpendency and ShelfCount.win

In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.

Deadpendency
ShelfCount.win

No description of Deadpendency yet.

ShelfCount is inventory management, recipe costing, and true COGS built for independent restaurants — created by a restaurant owner who was tired of MarketMan's complexity and pricing. Pricing: $50/month flat, month-to-month, cancel anytime. No per-seat fees, no tiers, unlimited team members and...

Read more about ShelfCount.win

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

Deadpendency 5 features
ShelfCount.win 6 features
  • Automated Dependency Monitoring
    Deadpendency automatically checks your project's dependencies for signs of being dead, unmaintained, or deprecated, saving developers from manually tracking the health of each dependency.
  • GitHub Integration
    Deadpendency integrates directly with GitHub as a GitHub App, making it easy to set up and run as part of your existing pull request and CI workflow without requiring additional infrastructure.
  • Early Warning System
    By catching dead or unmaintained dependencies early, Deadpendency helps teams avoid security risks and technical debt that come from relying on abandoned libraries.
  • Multi-Language Support
    Deadpendency supports a wide range of programming languages and package ecosystems, making it useful for polyglot projects and diverse development teams.
  • Low Configuration Overhead
    The tool is designed to work out of the box with minimal configuration, allowing teams to get value quickly without spending significant time on setup and customization.

Possible disadvantages

  • Limited to GitHub
    Deadpendency is primarily a GitHub App, which means teams using other platforms like GitLab or Bitbucket cannot easily use the service without switching or mirroring their repositories.
  • Potential False Positives
    The tool may flag dependencies as dead or unmaintained based on activity metrics, even when a library is stable and simply mature, leading to unnecessary concern or migration efforts.
  • Niche Use Case
    Dependency health checking is a relatively narrow function. Teams may prefer more comprehensive dependency management tools that also handle vulnerability scanning, license compliance, and version updates in one solution.
  • Reliance on External Signals
    Deadpendency relies on external signals like repository activity and release frequency to determine dependency health, which may not always accurately reflect the true maintenance status of a project.
  • Limited Community and Ecosystem
    As a relatively niche tool, Deadpendency has a smaller user community compared to alternatives like Dependabot or Renovate, which can mean fewer resources, community support, and third-party integrations.
  • Inventory counts from any phone
    No app install required
  • Invoice and receipt scanning
    Review-first approval, no auto-committed OCR
  • Recipe and prep-recipe costing
    Automatic recost when ingredient costs change
  • Par levels and purchase orders
    One-click POs emailed directly to vendors
  • POS sales sync
    Square and Clover live; Toast in certification
  • Theoretical vs. actual COGS
    Compare planned food cost to real food cost

Analysis

An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.

Deadpendency
ShelfCount.win

Overall verdict

  • Deadpendency is a solid choice for teams needing automated dependency health monitoring, particularly for tracking deprecated, unmaintained, or archived packages that traditional vulnerability scanners often miss, integrating cleanly into CI workflows via GitHub Actions.

Why this product is good

  • Focuses specifically on dependency 'deadness' (deprecated, archived, unmaintained packages) rather than just security vulnerabilities, filling a gap left by tools like Dependabot
  • Simple integration as a GitHub Action, making it easy to add to existing CI/CD pipelines without heavy configuration
  • Provides clear, actionable reports that help developers proactively address technical debt before it becomes a security or maintenance liability
  • Supports multiple language ecosystems, offering broad applicability across different tech stacks
  • Lightweight and automated approach reduces manual auditing effort for dependency health

Recommended for

  • Development teams wanting to proactively manage technical debt in their dependency trees
  • Open source maintainers looking to keep their projects' dependencies healthy and current
  • Organizations using GitHub Actions for CI/CD who want an easy-to-integrate dependency health check
  • Security-conscious teams who want visibility into unmaintained packages that could pose future risks
  • Projects with many dependencies where manual tracking of deprecation status is impractical

No analysis of ShelfCount.win yet.

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
Deadpendency
ShelfCount.win
100% 100%
Software Development
0% 0%
0% 0%
Inventory Management
100% 100%
100% 100%
Security
0% 0%
0% 0%
Restaurant Management
100% 100%

Questions & Answers

As answered by people managing Deadpendency and ShelfCount.win.

What makes your product unique?

ShelfCount.win's answer:

ShelfCount charges one flat $50/month fee with unlimited team members and unlimited storage locations, no per-seat pricing and no tiers. It combines inventory counts (from any phone, no app install), recipe and prep-recipe costing, invoice/receipt scanning, purchase ordering, and theoretical vs. actual COGS in one tool built specifically for independent restaurants.

Why should a person choose your product over its competitors?

ShelfCount.win's answer:

ShelfCount was built by a restaurant owner who found existing tools like MarketMan overpriced and overcomplicated for a single independent location. It covers the same core workflow — counts, recipe costing, invoice scanning, purchase orders, and COGS — at one flat rate with unlimited users and locations, backed by a 14-day free trial and one-click cancellation. A $299 concierge migration (including from MarketMan) is available for anyone switching over.

How would you describe the primary audience of your product?

ShelfCount.win's answer:

Independent restaurants, cafes, and coffee shops that need real inventory counts, recipe costing, and COGS tracking without enterprise-level pricing or complexity — typically single-location or small multi-location operators.

What's the story behind your product?

ShelfCount.win's answer:

ShelfCount was built by a restaurant owner who was frustrated with the cost and complexity of existing inventory platforms like MarketMan for running a single independent restaurant. The goal was a simpler, flat-rate tool that still covers the essentials — counts, recipe costing, invoice scanning, purchase ordering, and COGS — without per-seat fees or enterprise sales cycles.

User comments

Share your experience with using Deadpendency and ShelfCount.win. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

Deadpendency 2 mentions
ShelfCount.win 0 mentions
  • Deadpendency Open Sourced
    I created a tiny startup in Haskell which failed RIP. I decided to open source the code though. Source: over 3 years ago
  • Twitch Streamers?
    I sometimes stream my Haskell work on deadpendency - https://www.twitch.tv/alistairbuzz. Source: over 5 years ago

Tracking ShelfCount.win since Aug 2026.

Loading...