Software Alternatives & Startups

D (Programming Language) VS C (programming language)

Compare D (Programming Language) VS C (programming language) and see what are their differences

D (Programming Language)

D is a language with C-like syntax and static typing.

Rating
0 reviews
Pricing
Open source
C (programming language)

C is a general-purpose computer programming language.

Rating
0 reviews

Which is more popular?

Based on our record, D (Programming Language) seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 60 times since March 2021.

social mentions
60 vs 0
Programming Language popularity
76% vs 24%
alternatives listed
56 vs 55

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

D (Programming Language)
C (programming language)
Website dlang.org open-std.org
Pricing
Open source
—
Listed in

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

D (Programming Language) 6 features
C (programming language) 6 features
  • Performance
    D is designed to be a high-performance systems programming language, offering performance comparable to C and C++ through native machine code compilation.
  • Expressiveness
    D features a rich standard library and modern language constructs, such as garbage collection, first-class arrays, and advanced templating, making it easier to write expressive and maintainable code.
  • Memory Safety
    D offers optional garbage collection along with manual memory management. This hybrid approach can help in developing safer applications by reducing memory-related errors.
  • Interoperability
    D can easily interoperate with C API, enabling seamless integration with existing C libraries and systems. It also supports better C++ interoperability compared to other languages.
  • Built-in Unit Testing
    D has built-in support for unit tests, allowing developers to write and run tests as part of the language itself, facilitating test-driven development.
  • Concurrency
    D offers built-in concurrency support with message passing, similar to the actor model found in languages like Erlang, making it easier to write concurrent and parallel programs.

Possible disadvantages

  • Adoption
    D is not as widely adopted as other languages like C, C++, or Java. This limited adoption means fewer libraries, frameworks, and community support.
  • Toolchain Maturity
    While D's compilers and tools have improved over the years, they may still lack the maturity and feature set of more established languages, which can affect developer productivity.
  • Learning Curve
    D's richness and combination of paradigms (such as imperative, object-oriented, and functional programming) can present a steep learning curve for new developers.
  • Garbage Collection
    Although D offers optional garbage collection, its reliance on it for memory safety might be seen as a drawback for real-time system development where deterministic memory management is crucial.
  • Ecosystem
    The ecosystem for D is less vibrant compared to more popular languages, leading to potentially fewer third-party libraries, tools, and resources.
  • Standard Library Documentation
    The standard library documentation can be inconsistent or less comprehensive compared to other languages, making it difficult for developers to fully utilize all features of the language.
  • Efficiency
    C programming language is known for its performance efficiency due to minimal runtime and direct mapping to machine instructions.
  • Portability
    Programs written in C can be compiled and run on various platforms with minimal modifications, making it highly portable across systems.
  • Rich Library Support
    C provides a vast collection of libraries that offer numerous functions for tasks ranging from mathematical computations to input-output operations.
  • Flexibility
    C provides a versatile framework for writing various applications, including system software, and is suitable for low-level programming.
  • Control
    C offers extensive control over system resources and memory, which allows for efficient system programming and hardware manipulation.
  • Well-Established Standards
    C has a well-defined standardization (ANSI C), which helps maintain consistency and reliability across different applications and platforms.

Possible disadvantages

  • Low-level Abstraction
    C offers little abstraction from hardware, making it necessary for programmers to manage memory and system resources directly.
  • Complex Syntax
    C programming language has a somewhat complex syntax that may be difficult for beginners to grasp.
  • Manual Memory Management
    C requires explicit memory management, increasing the risk of memory leaks and buffer overflows if not handled properly.
  • Limited Error Handling
    The language provides limited support for error handling, often requiring codes to be written for error checking manually.
  • No Built-in Object-Oriented Programming
    C does not inherently support object-oriented programming paradigms like classes and inheritance, which are prevalent in modern programming.
  • Security Vulnerabilities
    The lack of built-in security features can expose programs to vulnerabilities such as buffer overflow attacks.

Analysis

An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.

D (Programming Language)
C (programming language)

Overall verdict

  • Overall, D is a solid programming language choice that balances performance with productivity. It may not be as widely adopted as some other languages, but it has a dedicated community and continues to evolve, making it a viable option for various programming tasks.

Why this product is good

  • The D programming language is considered good by many developers for various reasons. It combines the performance and low-level control of C/C++ with the expressive power and ease of use found in modern languages. D offers features like garbage collection, first-class functions, and compile-time function execution, providing both speed and flexibility. Its interoperability with C, the convenience of a powerful standard library (Phobos), and the availability of packages via the DUB package manager make it a practical choice for systems programming, application development, and rapid prototyping.

Recommended for

  • System programming enthusiasts looking for an alternative to C/C++
  • Developers interested in writing high-performance applications
  • Programmers who appreciate modern language features and strong community support
  • Projects requiring seamless C integration
  • Individuals looking for a language that supports easy code maintenance and scalability

No analysis of C (programming language) yet.

Videos

Walkthroughs and reviews on video.

D (Programming Language) 1 video + Add
C (programming language) 0 videos + Add

D Language Tutorial

No C (programming language) videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
D (Programming Language)
C (programming language)
76% 76%
24% 24%
73% 73%
OOP
27% 27%
100% 100%
0% 0%

User comments

Share your experience with using D (Programming Language) and C (programming language). For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

D (Programming Language) 60 mentions
C (programming language) 0 mentions

View more

Tracking C (programming language) since Mar 2021.

Alternatives to D (Programming Language) and C (programming language)

When comparing D (Programming Language) and C (programming language), you can also consider the following products.