Software Alternatives & Startups
Register | Login

Cyclr VS CrossBrowserTesting

Compare Cyclr VS CrossBrowserTesting and see what are their differences

Cyclr

Powerful SaaS integration toolkit for SaaS developers - create, amplify, manage and publish native integrations from within your app with Cyclr's flexible Embedded iPaaS.

Rating
5.0 · 2 reviews
Pricing
Paid Free trial
1 VibeVoted session
Alternatives Is it good?
CrossBrowserTesting

Browser Testing made simple! Run automated, visual, and manual tests on 1500+ real browsers and mobile devices. Test more browsers, in less time.

Rating
0 reviews
Promote on VibeVoted
Alternatives Is it good?
BusinessLOG SOC
A centralized log management and SIEM platform built for compliance, auditing, anomaly detection, and infrastructure visibility. sponsored
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Which is more popular?

Based on our record, CrossBrowserTesting should be more popular than Cyclr. It has been mentioned 6 times since March 2021.

social mentions
2 vs 6
Data Integration popularity
100% vs 0%
alternatives listed
217 vs 168

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

Cyclr
CrossBrowserTesting
Website cyclr.com crossbrowsertesting.com
Pricing
Paid Free trial Official pricing
Official pricing
Platforms
Browser REST API
—
Company 2015 —
Listed in
Integrations Platform As A Service Monitoring Tools SaaS Management API Integration Data Integration Integrations Marketplace SaaS +4
Browser Testing Website Testing Automated Testing Software Testing +1

About Cyclr and CrossBrowserTesting

In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.

Cyclr
CrossBrowserTesting

Cyclr is a SaaS integration toolkit for SaaS platforms and app developers, providing a complete solution to serve your customers integration needs -- all from within your application. Cyclr enables you to deliver integrations to 100s of popular apps and services with low-code and low engineering...

Read more about Cyclr

No description of CrossBrowserTesting yet.

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

Cyclr 6 features
CrossBrowserTesting 7 features
  • Pre-built Connectors
    +400
  • Embedded Integration Marketplace
  • Low Code Integration Builder
  • SOC 2 Type 2 Accreditation
  • Private Cloud Deployments
  • Proxy API
  • Wide Range of Browsers and Devices
    CrossBrowserTesting offers a large selection of browsers and devices, allowing developers to test their applications in various environments to ensure compatibility.
  • Live Testing
    Users can perform live interactive testing on real devices, enabling them to manually verify the behavior of their application and catch issues that automated tests might miss.
  • Automated Testing Integration
    The platform provides integration with popular testing frameworks and tools such as Selenium, Appium, and others, facilitating automated testing workflows.
  • Visual Testing
    CrossBrowserTesting offers visual testing capabilities, allowing users to compare screenshots from different browsers to identify design inconsistencies.
  • Comprehensive Reports
    Detailed test reports with screenshots and logs are generated, helping users to quickly identify and address issues found during testing.
  • Parallel Testing
    The service supports parallel testing, enabling users to run multiple tests simultaneously, significantly reducing the overall testing time.
  • Easy-to-Use Interface
    The user interface is intuitive and user-friendly, making it easy for both beginners and experienced testers to navigate and utilize the platform effectively.

Possible disadvantages

  • Cost
    CrossBrowserTesting can be expensive, especially for small teams or individual developers who might find the subscription plans to be cost-prohibitive.
  • Performance
    Tests on real devices can sometimes be slow due to the availability and network constraints, which can affect the overall efficiency of the testing process.
  • Limited Mobile Devices
    While the platform includes a variety of devices, the selection might not cover all the latest models or less common devices, potentially limiting testing coverage.
  • Learning Curve for Advanced Features
    Some advanced features and integrations might require a learning curve, which could be challenging for users who are not familiar with automated testing or the specific tools supported.
  • Test Timeout Issues
    Occasional issues with test timeouts have been reported, which can disrupt the testing process and require reruns or additional troubleshooting.

Analysis

An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.

Cyclr
CrossBrowserTesting

Overall verdict

  • Cyclr is generally considered a good solution for businesses looking to streamline their processes and improve data integration across various platforms. Its robust features and user-centric design make it a competitive option in the iPaaS market.

Why this product is good

  • Cyclr is an integration platform as a service (iPaaS) that allows users to connect and automate workflows across multiple applications and services. It is known for its user-friendly drag-and-drop interface, extensive library of pre-built connectors, and flexibility in creating custom integrations. Businesses often choose Cyclr for its ease of use, scalability, and ability to reduce manual data entry and improve operational efficiency.

Recommended for

    Cyclr is recommended for small to medium-sized businesses and companies seeking to automate their processes without needing extensive technical expertise. It is particularly beneficial for those who need to connect multiple SaaS tools and want a reliable and scalable solution for managing data flows and integrations.

Overall verdict

  • CrossBrowserTesting is generally regarded as a good solution for cross-browser testing needs, particularly for teams that require real-time testing and robust automation capabilities. Its ease of use, extensive browser/device coverage, and integration options make it a strong choice for many development and QA teams.

Why this product is good

  • CrossBrowserTesting is considered a valuable tool because it provides a cloud-based platform for testing websites and mobile applications across different browsers, devices, and operating systems. It enables developers and QA teams to ensure that their applications function correctly on various platforms without needing to maintain a complex setup of physical devices. The platform offers real-time debugging, automated screenshot testing, and integration with various CI/CD tools, which streamlines the testing process.

Recommended for

    This service is highly recommended for software development teams, QA engineers, and web developers who need to ensure compatibility and functionality of their web applications across multiple browsers and devices. It is particularly useful for organizations with a focus on maintaining high-quality user experiences across various platforms.

Videos

Walkthroughs and reviews on video.

Cyclr 0 videos + Add
CrossBrowserTesting 1 video + Add

No Cyclr videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Cross Browser Testing Tool Comparison – LambdaTest vs. CrossBrowserTesting

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
Cyclr
CrossBrowserTesting
100% 100%
Data Integration
0% 0%
0% 0%
Website Testing
100% 100%
100% 100%
Web Service Automation
0% 0%
0% 0%
Browser Testing
100% 100%

User comments

Share your experience with using Cyclr and CrossBrowserTesting. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Reviews and articles

External articles and on-site reviews we used to compare the two products.

Cyclr 5.0 · 2 reviews
CrossBrowserTesting no reviews yet

View more

We have no reviews of CrossBrowserTesting yet. Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

Cyclr 2 mentions
CrossBrowserTesting 6 mentions
  • Swagger Alternative: Tired of UI Limitations? Top 10 API Clients!
    Cyclr provides embedded integration solutions specifically for SaaS and app vendors, offering a complete customer services solution. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
  • Automating update of contacts via FTP
    Other good solutions with similar features would be PieSync, Automate.io, Zapier, Cyclr, Workato. All of these app integrations allow you to connect your Mailchimp account with your SaaS app (in your case with your database). Source: over 5 years ago
  • How can I test my site on safari if I don't have a Mac ?
    Yeah I moved on pretty quick from browserstack, but it seems to be the most popular. I've tried crossbrowsertesting.com but at the moment I really like app.lambdatest.com. Source: about 4 years ago
  • great list of "cool" sites from hnews
    Https://geizhals.de/ - this is a german site but the UI is nice and you can find a lot of stuff. Https://www.gsmarena.com/search.php3? - a phone search site. When I was at https://crossbrowsertesting.com we used this site a... - Source: dev.to / over 4 years ago
  • Learn How To Create, Test and Deploy a Single Page App with Vue 3 + Vite and Pinia
    Fortunately we don’t need to install, nor configure, any other tools, unless maybe some fancy reporters, but for now we can get everything we need in terms of end-to-end automated testing out of Nightwatch. Besides Chrome, Nightwatch has... - Source: dev.to / almost 5 years ago

View more

Alternatives to Cyclr and CrossBrowserTesting

When comparing Cyclr and CrossBrowserTesting, you can also consider the following products.

Loading...