Cursor Reviews

Substly Reviews

1. Tobias Larsson

   · Business Developer at Founders Loft · almost 3 years ago
   Keeping track of all subscriptions just got (much) easier

   We have a ton of Saas tools. Before using Substly they were scattered around. Now everything is in one place which has made it much easier for us, especially when we are off-boarding someone. Easy to overview and great value for the money.

   👍 Pros:    Easy to use|Great customer support|Great value for the money|Lower cost|Saves a ton of time|Great for collaboration

   👎 Cons:    Slack and teams notification
2. magnus Orrebrant

   · marketing at Svenska Rovdjursföreningen · about 3 years ago
   better control of our saas spending

   Overview - gather everything in one place have improved the visibility of all our subscriptions, quick implementation, improved cost control, User friendly,

   👍 Pros:    Overall quality|Lower cost|Easy user interface|Short learning curve|Overview of cost spend

   👎 Cons:    None
3. Richard Uddh

   · Sales Manager at FlexIT Distribution · about 3 years ago
   Best way to spend money, to save money!

   Using Substly has given us a better understanding of how we use our SaaS-apps and improved our ability to manage software licenses, resulting in better decision-making and cost savings. Substly's overview feature has been particularly helpful in this regard. Additionally, the offboarding feature has streamlined the process of removing software access for departing employees.

Cursor mentions (9)

• As SpaceX deal looms, Cursor partners with Chainguard to secure open-source dependencies in AI-built code

  Cursor has spent the past week in headlines after confirming a partnership with SpaceX that could eventually lead to a $60 billion acquisition. The deal, for now, centres on training more capable coding models using SpaceX’s compute infrastructure. - Source: dev.to / 1 day ago

• How to Get Your First Tool Online

  The step up from there is an editor with a built-in agent like Cursor, Google Antigravity, Windsurf, or VS Code with a coding extension. These are code editors with an AI agent living inside them, and the difference is the responsible party for getting things from place to place. Instead of the software creator shuttling code between windows, the AI agent edits the project files directly and runs the GitHub and... - Source: dev.to / 13 days ago

• I almost credited llms.txt for a Google AI Mode win. Then I read what Google actually says.

  Where llms.txt genuinely gets read is a different layer: coding and agent tooling — Cursor, Claude Code, GitHub Copilot, Windsurf — pulling a documentation site's pages with less token waste, plus emerging agent protocols like OpenAI's Agents SDK. That's real, and it's growing fast. - Source: dev.to / 13 days ago

• Tokens, Context, and Why Small AI Tasks Aren't Cheap

  If you don’t believe me, go to Google AI Studio, get you an API key, create a project, then open Cursor, add the key, add whatever model they have available to use, run a task and you will see how models like Gemini 3.5 or 2.5 Flash which gives you 5 Requests Per Minute and 20 Requests Per Day will scream at you with hitting a limit rate. - Source: dev.to / 20 days ago

• Use LLM for EDA licenses analysis

  Here is an example how to connect Prometheus DB to Cursor AI code editor. - Source: dev.to / 10 months ago

Substly mentions (0)