
TestDino
Report Portal
Testomatio
TestMu AI (Formerly LambdaTest)
DeploySentinel
Testinel.dev
Cypress Cloud
Alternative Cypress Dashboard - record, debug and analyze your cypress tests for less.

Exercise dataset for fitness apps: transparent background, animations, no subscription

Which is more popular?
Based on our record, Currents seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 3 times since March 2021.
Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Website | currents.dev | repdb.co |
| Pricing | ||
| Platforms | — | |
| Company | — | 2026 |
| Listed in |
In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.


No description of Currents yet.
RepDB is a one-time-purchase exercise dataset with animations for developers building fitness and workout apps — not a subscription, not a rate-limited API. You download the data once and own it: JSON (and SQLite on the higher tier), WebP images, and full EN/DE/ES translations, with no...
What each product offers, as listed by its team.


No features have been listed yet.
An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.


Overall verdict
Why this product is good
Recommended for
No analysis of RepDB yet.
Walkthroughs and reviews on video.
How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.


As answered by people managing Currents and RepDB.
RepDB's answer:
RepDB is sold as a one-time download, not a metered API — you own the JSON/SQLite data and WebP images outright, with no rate limits, no per-request billing, and no risk of the vendor cutting off access. It's also the only dataset in this space with EN/DE/ES translations, transparent (alpha-channel) images with no watermark, muscle-group highlighting, safety/goal tags, and looping animations on the higher tier.
RepDB's answer:
RepDB grew out of a consumer workout app its creator was building solo. Sourcing exercise images and data meant either paying for a subscription API with usage caps and no caching rights, or producing everything from scratch. The illustrated, multi-language dataset was built for us first, then split out as its own product once it became clear other indie developers had the same problem and preferred to buy the data outright rather than rent it through an API.
RepDB's answer:
Most alternatives are subscription APIs — you pay monthly, you're capped on requests, and ExerciseDB's terms of use explicitly forbid caching or storing the data at all, so every image render is a live paid API call. RepDB is the opposite: pay once, download the files, self-host with zero ongoing dependency. It's also the only option offering true DE/ES localization and transparent images instead of a white box behind every exercise.
RepDB's answer:
Solo developers and small teams building fitness or workout-tracking apps (iOS, Android, web) who need licensed exercise images and structured exercise data, but don't want to build their own media pipeline or depend on a rate-limited third-party API.
Share your experience with using Currents and RepDB. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.


Cypress offers features like test parallelization and analytics that help teams quicken their testing process. While initially expensive, it now has a free tier with limitations on the number of parallel tests you can run. To overcome... - Source: dev.to / about 2 years ago
Currents.dev has 12 pricing levels, ranging from $40/mo to $1170/mo, until you hit the "contact us" phase: https://currents.dev/#pricing. - Source: Hacker News / almost 3 years ago
Neat work and congrats on the launch! Speaking of Cypress Dashboard drop-in replacement: https://currents.dev is a must-be-mentioned tool! As well as the open source and free https://sorry-cypress.dev Sorry for the shameless plug :) We... - Source: Hacker News / about 4 years ago
Tracking RepDB since Jul 2026.
When comparing Currents and RepDB, you can also consider the following products.

Cloud-based companion web app for Playwright featuring an agent-writable MCP server. Developers use Claude Code or Cursor to query CI runs, analyze flaky tests, compare runs, and manage test suites using natural language.
Compare TestDino to Currents or RepDB:


Testomat.io — Test Management System for automated tests. A powerful solution to keep and sync your automated and manual tests in one place, provides to make testing activities completely visible and transparent for all teammates Dev, PM, BA
Compare Testomatio to Currents or RepDB:

World’s first full-stack Agentic AI Quality Engineering platform.
Compare TestMu AI (Formerly LambdaTest) to Currents or RepDB:

Easily find the root cause of unreproducible Cypress test failures from CI with DOM snapshots, network requests and console logs.
Compare DeploySentinel to Currents or RepDB:

Analyze Selenium and Playwright test runs, logs, and recurring failures so your team can find root causes and ship stable software faster.
Compare Testinel.dev to Currents or RepDB: