Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

CSS Scan VS CodeFactor.io

Compare CSS Scan VS CodeFactor.io and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

CSS Scan logo CSS Scan

Instantly check or copy computed CSS from any element for only ~95$

CodeFactor.io logo CodeFactor.io

Automated Code Review for GitHub & BitBucket
  • CSS Scan Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-14
  • CodeFactor.io Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-10-19

CSS Scan features and specs

  • Ease of Use
    CSS Scan offers an intuitive and user-friendly interface, making it easy for developers of all skill levels to inspect and copy CSS styles directly from the browser.
  • Time-Saving
    It significantly reduces the time needed to debug and replicate styles by allowing quick copying of well-structured CSS rules from any element on the page.
  • Accuracy
    The tool ensures that the copied CSS maintains the exact styling, including computed styles and vendor prefixes, providing high accuracy in replication.
  • Live Edits
    CSS Scan enables live editing of styles, allowing developers to make real-time changes and see the results instantly, which is beneficial for testing and adjustments.
  • Visual Representation
    The extension visually displays how CSS rules are applied, making it easier to understand complex styling hierarchies and cascades.

Possible disadvantages of CSS Scan

  • Cost
    CSS Scan is a paid tool, so there is a financial investment required, which might not be feasible for all developers, especially those working on personal or non-commercial projects.
  • Browser Compatibility
    As a browser extension, its functionality may be limited to supported browsers, potentially excluding users of less common or unsupported browsers.
  • Limited Scope
    While CSS Scan is powerful for copying and analyzing CSS, it does not offer features for editing or managing CSS files directly, requiring another tool or manual intervention for those tasks.
  • Dependency
    Relying on a third-party tool can be a downside if the tool experiences downtime, changes its pricing, or ceases development, leaving users in a difficult position.
  • Privacy Concerns
    Using browser extensions can raise privacy concerns, as they typically have access to the pages you visit; ensuring the trustworthiness of the extension is crucial.

CodeFactor.io features and specs

  • Real-time Code Review
    CodeFactor.io provides immediate feedback on code changes by performing real-time code reviews, which helps catch issues early in the development process.
  • Integration with Popular Platforms
    The platform offers seamless integration with popular version control systems like GitHub, GitLab, and Bitbucket, allowing easy adoption into existing workflows.
  • Detailed Reports
    Generates detailed reports with clear metrics and actionable insights on code quality, helping teams understand and improve their codebase.
  • Automated Code Review
    Automates the code review process, saving developers time and ensuring consistency in code quality assessments.
  • Support for Multiple Languages
    Supports a wide range of programming languages, making it versatile for teams working with diverse technology stacks.

Possible disadvantages of CodeFactor.io

  • Limited Free Plan
    The free plan has limitations in terms of features and the number of private repositories it can support, which may not be sufficient for larger teams or projects.
  • False Positives/Negatives
    Like many automated code review tools, CodeFactor.io can sometimes generate false positives or negatives, which might require manual inspection.
  • Performance Issues
    Some users have reported performance issues, such as slow analysis times, especially with very large codebases.
  • Learning Curve
    Although the interface is user-friendly, there can be a learning curve associated with interpreting some of the more detailed metrics and reports.
  • Customization Limitations
    The level of customization in the analysis rules and settings can be limited compared to some other code quality tools, potentially restricting its adaptability to specific team needs.

CSS Scan videos

Chrome CSS Viewer CSS Scan 2.0 - All Your CSS Secrets Revealed

More videos:

  • Review - CSS Scan and Microthemer are buddies

CodeFactor.io videos

Getting started with CodeFactor.io

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to CSS Scan and CodeFactor.io)
Developer Tools
100 100%
0% 0
Code Coverage
0 0%
100% 100
Design Tools
100 100%
0% 0
Code Quality
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using CSS Scan and CodeFactor.io. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, CSS Scan seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 13 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

CSS Scan mentions (13)

View more

CodeFactor.io mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of CodeFactor.io yet. Tracking of CodeFactor.io recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing CSS Scan and CodeFactor.io, you can also consider the following products

CSS Scan Pro - The easiest way to get and edit the CSS of any website, live

Codacy - Automatically reviews code style, security, duplication, complexity, and coverage on every change while tracking code quality throughout your sprints.

Hoverify - All-in-one browser extension to improve your web dev experience.

SonarQube - SonarQube, a core component of the Sonar solution, is an open source, self-managed tool that systematically helps developers and organizations deliver Clean Code.

CSS Peeper - Smart CSS viewer tailored for Designers.

CodeClimate - Code Climate provides automated code review for your apps, letting you fix quality and security issues before they hit production. We check every commit, branch and pull request for changes in quality and potential vulnerabilities.