Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

CrossBrowserTesting VS VideoJS

Compare CrossBrowserTesting VS VideoJS and see what are their differences

Zoho Projects
Turn every Project into a Success Story with Zoho Projects featured
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

CrossBrowserTesting logo CrossBrowserTesting

Browser Testing made simple! Run automated, visual, and manual tests on 1500+ real browsers and mobile devices. Test more browsers, in less time.

VideoJS logo VideoJS

VideoJS is an HTML5 Video Player, built with Javascript and CSS, with a fallback to a Flash video...
  • CrossBrowserTesting Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-23
  • VideoJS Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-04-29

CrossBrowserTesting features and specs

  • Wide Range of Browsers and Devices
    CrossBrowserTesting offers a large selection of browsers and devices, allowing developers to test their applications in various environments to ensure compatibility.
  • Live Testing
    Users can perform live interactive testing on real devices, enabling them to manually verify the behavior of their application and catch issues that automated tests might miss.
  • Automated Testing Integration
    The platform provides integration with popular testing frameworks and tools such as Selenium, Appium, and others, facilitating automated testing workflows.
  • Visual Testing
    CrossBrowserTesting offers visual testing capabilities, allowing users to compare screenshots from different browsers to identify design inconsistencies.
  • Comprehensive Reports
    Detailed test reports with screenshots and logs are generated, helping users to quickly identify and address issues found during testing.
  • Parallel Testing
    The service supports parallel testing, enabling users to run multiple tests simultaneously, significantly reducing the overall testing time.
  • Easy-to-Use Interface
    The user interface is intuitive and user-friendly, making it easy for both beginners and experienced testers to navigate and utilize the platform effectively.

Possible disadvantages of CrossBrowserTesting

  • Cost
    CrossBrowserTesting can be expensive, especially for small teams or individual developers who might find the subscription plans to be cost-prohibitive.
  • Performance
    Tests on real devices can sometimes be slow due to the availability and network constraints, which can affect the overall efficiency of the testing process.
  • Limited Mobile Devices
    While the platform includes a variety of devices, the selection might not cover all the latest models or less common devices, potentially limiting testing coverage.
  • Learning Curve for Advanced Features
    Some advanced features and integrations might require a learning curve, which could be challenging for users who are not familiar with automated testing or the specific tools supported.
  • Test Timeout Issues
    Occasional issues with test timeouts have been reported, which can disrupt the testing process and require reruns or additional troubleshooting.

VideoJS features and specs

  • Open Source
    VideoJS is open source, meaning it has a large community of developers contributing to its ongoing improvements and features.
  • Cross-browser Compatibility
    VideoJS works smoothly on all modern browsers, ensuring a wide reach and consistent user experience.
  • Plugins and Extensions
    There are numerous plugins and extensions available for VideoJS, allowing for extensive customization and additional functionality.
  • Responsive Design
    VideoJS supports responsive design out of the box, ensuring that videos look good on all screen sizes from mobile phones to desktop monitors.
  • Multiple Video Formats
    VideoJS supports a wide range of video formats such as MP4, WebM, and HLS, providing flexibility in content delivery.
  • Customizable Skins
    The player is highly customizable, allowing developers to adjust its appearance to match the branding of their websites or applications.
  • Comprehensive Documentation
    VideoJS has thorough and easy-to-follow documentation, which facilitates quicker implementation and troubleshooting.

Possible disadvantages of VideoJS

  • Performance
    For sites with heavy traffic, VideoJS can sometimes have performance issues, such as longer load times or buffering.
  • Complexity for Beginners
    The extensive customization options may be confusing for beginners who are not yet familiar with web development and video standards.
  • Dependency Management
    VideoJS relies on various dependencies that need to be managed carefully to avoid conflicts and ensure smooth operation.
  • Limited Built-in Features
    Some advanced features may require additional plugins or custom development, as they are not available out of the box.
  • Mobile Browsers
    While VideoJS does support mobile browsers, there can be occasional inconsistencies or issues, particularly with less popular mobile operating systems.

Analysis of CrossBrowserTesting

Overall verdict

  • CrossBrowserTesting is generally regarded as a good solution for cross-browser testing needs, particularly for teams that require real-time testing and robust automation capabilities. Its ease of use, extensive browser/device coverage, and integration options make it a strong choice for many development and QA teams.

Why this product is good

  • CrossBrowserTesting is considered a valuable tool because it provides a cloud-based platform for testing websites and mobile applications across different browsers, devices, and operating systems. It enables developers and QA teams to ensure that their applications function correctly on various platforms without needing to maintain a complex setup of physical devices. The platform offers real-time debugging, automated screenshot testing, and integration with various CI/CD tools, which streamlines the testing process.

Recommended for

    This service is highly recommended for software development teams, QA engineers, and web developers who need to ensure compatibility and functionality of their web applications across multiple browsers and devices. It is particularly useful for organizations with a focus on maintaining high-quality user experiences across various platforms.

Analysis of VideoJS

Overall verdict

  • Yes, VideoJS is generally considered a good option for embedding videos on websites due to its versatility, ease of integration, and comprehensive documentation.

Why this product is good

  • VideoJS is a popular HTML5 video player framework that offers extensive customization options, strong community support, and a wide range of plugins. It is open-source, allowing developers to contribute to its development and tailor it to specific needs. It supports modern video formats and features like subtitles, responsive layouts, and adaptive streaming.

Recommended for

  • Developers looking for a customizable video player solution.
  • Websites requiring support for a variety of video formats and features.
  • Projects needing an open-source solution with active community support.
  • Sites that benefit from responsive and mobile-friendly video playback.

CrossBrowserTesting videos

+ Add

Cross Browser Testing Tool Comparison – LambdaTest vs. CrossBrowserTesting

VideoJS videos

+ Add

Demmo

More videos:

  • Demo - Doraemon Music 2

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to CrossBrowserTesting and VideoJS)

CrossBrowserTesting

VideoJS

Website Testing
100 100%
Website Testing
0% 0
YouTube Tools
0 0%
YouTube Tools
100% 100
Browser Testing
100 100%
Browser Testing
0% 0
Video Platform
0 0%
Video Platform
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using CrossBrowserTesting and VideoJS. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, VideoJS should be more popular than CrossBrowserTesting. It has been mentiond 22 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

CrossBrowserTesting mentions (6)

  • How can I test my site on safari if I don't have a Mac ?
    Yeah I moved on pretty quick from browserstack, but it seems to be the most popular. I've tried crossbrowsertesting.com but at the moment I really like app.lambdatest.com. Source: almost 3 years ago
  • great list of "cool" sites from hnews
    Https://geizhals.de/ - this is a german site but the UI is nice and you can find a lot of stuff. Https://www.gsmarena.com/search.php3? - a phone search site. When I was at https://crossbrowsertesting.com we used this site a lot Https://www.howacarworks.com/ - how a car works Https://www.mcmaster.com/ - the UI here is so nice. Those illustrations Https://ciechanow.ski/mechanical-watch/ - how does a mechanical... - Source: dev.to / over 3 years ago
  • Learn How To Create, Test and Deploy a Single Page App with Vue 3 + Vite and Pinia
    Fortunately we don’t need to install, nor configure, any other tools, unless maybe some fancy reporters, but for now we can get everything we need in terms of end-to-end automated testing out of Nightwatch. Besides Chrome, Nightwatch has built-in support for all major browsers, including Firefox, Edge, and Safari, all thanks to its integration with the W3C Webdriver API and Selenium. It also allows you to use... - Source: dev.to / over 3 years ago
  • Free for dev - list of software (SaaS, PaaS, IaaS, etc.)
    Crossbrowsertesting.com - Manual, Visual, and Selenium Browser Testing in the cloud - free for Open Source. - Source: dev.to / about 4 years ago
  • How do y’all test responsiveness of website?
    Professionally, I do basically the same for dev testing. We also have various devices on different platforms/versions in the office when needed, and our QA team primarily uses Cross Browser Testing Tool. If I need to check something specific, I usually use CBT. Source: over 4 years ago
View more

VideoJS mentions (22)

View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing CrossBrowserTesting and VideoJS, you can also consider the following products

BrowserStack - BrowserStack is a software testing platform for developers to comprehensively test websites and mobile applications for quality.

JW Player - JW Player is an embeddable media player.

Sauce Labs - Test mobile or web apps instantly across 700+ browser/OS/device platform combinations - without infrastructure setup.

Flowplayer - Flowplayer is a video player for web sites.

browserling - Live interactive cross-browser testing from your browser.

Plyr - A simple, accessible and customisable HTML5 media player

Loading...