Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

CrossBrowserTesting VS Pythagora

Compare CrossBrowserTesting VS Pythagora and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

CrossBrowserTesting logo CrossBrowserTesting

Browser Testing made simple! Run automated, visual, and manual tests on 1500+ real browsers and mobile devices. Test more browsers, in less time.

Pythagora logo Pythagora

Generate automated integration tests from server activity
  • CrossBrowserTesting Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-23
  • Pythagora Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-06-29

CrossBrowserTesting features and specs

  • Wide Range of Browsers and Devices
    CrossBrowserTesting offers a large selection of browsers and devices, allowing developers to test their applications in various environments to ensure compatibility.
  • Live Testing
    Users can perform live interactive testing on real devices, enabling them to manually verify the behavior of their application and catch issues that automated tests might miss.
  • Automated Testing Integration
    The platform provides integration with popular testing frameworks and tools such as Selenium, Appium, and others, facilitating automated testing workflows.
  • Visual Testing
    CrossBrowserTesting offers visual testing capabilities, allowing users to compare screenshots from different browsers to identify design inconsistencies.
  • Comprehensive Reports
    Detailed test reports with screenshots and logs are generated, helping users to quickly identify and address issues found during testing.
  • Parallel Testing
    The service supports parallel testing, enabling users to run multiple tests simultaneously, significantly reducing the overall testing time.
  • Easy-to-Use Interface
    The user interface is intuitive and user-friendly, making it easy for both beginners and experienced testers to navigate and utilize the platform effectively.

Possible disadvantages of CrossBrowserTesting

  • Cost
    CrossBrowserTesting can be expensive, especially for small teams or individual developers who might find the subscription plans to be cost-prohibitive.
  • Performance
    Tests on real devices can sometimes be slow due to the availability and network constraints, which can affect the overall efficiency of the testing process.
  • Limited Mobile Devices
    While the platform includes a variety of devices, the selection might not cover all the latest models or less common devices, potentially limiting testing coverage.
  • Learning Curve for Advanced Features
    Some advanced features and integrations might require a learning curve, which could be challenging for users who are not familiar with automated testing or the specific tools supported.
  • Test Timeout Issues
    Occasional issues with test timeouts have been reported, which can disrupt the testing process and require reruns or additional troubleshooting.

Pythagora features and specs

  • Automated Testing
    Pythagora automates the process of writing tests for code, which can save developers significant time and effort in ensuring code reliability.
  • AI-Powered Code Analysis
    The platform uses AI to generate insights into the codebase, potentially identifying hidden bugs or areas for improvement that might be missed by human reviewers.
  • Continuous Integration
    Pythagora can be integrated into existing CI/CD pipelines, which allows for continuous testing and integration, ensuring rapid feedback cycles.
  • User Friendly
    The user interface is designed to be accessible even to those who may not be deeply familiar with testing frameworks, lowering the barrier of entry for adoption.
  • Scalability
    Pythagora is scalable to accommodate both small projects and large enterprise applications, making it versatile across different business environments.

Possible disadvantages of Pythagora

  • Dependency on Platform
    Using Pythagora means relying on a third-party platform, which can be a risk if the service experiences downtimes or changes in terms and pricing.
  • Learning Curve
    Although user-friendly, there may still be a learning curve for developers who are new to AI-based tools or automated testing frameworks.
  • Integration Challenges
    Integrating Pythagora into existing development processes and tools may require significant initial investment and adjustments.
  • Potential Overhead
    For smaller projects, the overhead of setting up and maintaining Pythagora might outweigh the benefits of automation and testing.
  • Cost
    Depending on the pricing model, using Pythagora may introduce additional costs to a project, especially for startups or open-source initiatives with limited budgets.

Analysis of CrossBrowserTesting

Overall verdict

  • CrossBrowserTesting is generally regarded as a good solution for cross-browser testing needs, particularly for teams that require real-time testing and robust automation capabilities. Its ease of use, extensive browser/device coverage, and integration options make it a strong choice for many development and QA teams.

Why this product is good

  • CrossBrowserTesting is considered a valuable tool because it provides a cloud-based platform for testing websites and mobile applications across different browsers, devices, and operating systems. It enables developers and QA teams to ensure that their applications function correctly on various platforms without needing to maintain a complex setup of physical devices. The platform offers real-time debugging, automated screenshot testing, and integration with various CI/CD tools, which streamlines the testing process.

Recommended for

    This service is highly recommended for software development teams, QA engineers, and web developers who need to ensure compatibility and functionality of their web applications across multiple browsers and devices. It is particularly useful for organizations with a focus on maintaining high-quality user experiences across various platforms.

CrossBrowserTesting videos

Cross Browser Testing Tool Comparison โ€“ LambdaTest vs. CrossBrowserTesting

Pythagora videos

Pythagora 2.0 Review | (2025) This All In One Ai Platform Is Incredible

More videos:

  • Tutorial - This AI Coder BUILDS (Pythagora 2.0 Tutorial)
  • Review - Pythagora 2 0 Review โ€“ Is It the Future of No Code AI Development 2025

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to CrossBrowserTesting and Pythagora)
Website Testing
100 100%
0% 0
Software Testing
0 0%
100% 100
Browser Testing
100 100%
0% 0
QA
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using CrossBrowserTesting and Pythagora. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

CrossBrowserTesting might be a bit more popular than Pythagora. We know about 6 links to it since March 2021 and only 5 links to Pythagora. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

CrossBrowserTesting mentions (6)

  • How can I test my site on safari if I don't have a Mac ?
    Yeah I moved on pretty quick from browserstack, but it seems to be the most popular. I've tried crossbrowsertesting.com but at the moment I really like app.lambdatest.com. Source: almost 3 years ago
  • great list of "cool" sites from hnews
    Https://geizhals.de/ - this is a german site but the UI is nice and you can find a lot of stuff. Https://www.gsmarena.com/search.php3? - a phone search site. When I was at https://crossbrowsertesting.com we used this site a lot Https://www.howacarworks.com/ - how a car works Https://www.mcmaster.com/ - the UI here is so nice. Those illustrations Https://ciechanow.ski/mechanical-watch/ - how does a mechanical... - Source: dev.to / over 3 years ago
  • Learn How To Create, Test and Deploy a Single Page App with Vue 3 + Vite and Pinia
    Fortunately we donโ€™t need to install, nor configure, any other tools, unless maybe some fancy reporters, but for now we can get everything we need in terms of end-to-end automated testing out of Nightwatch. Besides Chrome, Nightwatch has built-in support for all major browsers, including Firefox, Edge, and Safari, all thanks to its integration with the W3C Webdriver API and Selenium. It also allows you to use... - Source: dev.to / over 3 years ago
  • Free for dev - list of software (SaaS, PaaS, IaaS, etc.)
    Crossbrowsertesting.com - Manual, Visual, and Selenium Browser Testing in the cloud - free for Open Source. - Source: dev.to / about 4 years ago
  • How do yโ€™all test responsiveness of website?
    Professionally, I do basically the same for dev testing. We also have various devices on different platforms/versions in the office when needed, and our QA team primarily uses Cross Browser Testing Tool. If I need to check something specific, I usually use CBT. Source: over 4 years ago
View more

Pythagora mentions (5)

  • The Security Holes AI Always Creates (And How to Spot Them)
    At Pythagora, we've built security reviews directly into the AI development process. Instead of requiring developers to manually catch these patterns, our platform identifies common security issues as code is generated and suggests fixes automatically. - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago
  • 5 Prompts That Make Any AI App More Secure
    At Pythagora, we build these security measures into the development process by default, rather than requiring separate prompts. Security shouldn't be an afterthought - it should be integrated from the first line of code. - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago
  • A Practical Guide to Debugging AI-Built Applications
    At Pythagora, we've seen too many promising AI-generated projects die because users couldn't understand what was going wrong when issues inevitably arose. That's why we built debugging capabilities directly into the development process:. - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago
  • Will Your AI Generated App Break in Production? 3 Ways to Test It
    At Pythagora, we've built our platform specifically to address these transition points where other AI tools break down. Instead of just generating code and leaving you stranded when issues arise, Pythagora provides:. - Source: dev.to / 5 months ago
  • How We Made Sure Big Companies Canโ€™t Steal Our Code
    When we started building Pythagora in 2023., it was one of the first agentic systems where AI agents work together to create entire codebases - so, we wanted to share it with the world by showing and inspiring others to build complex systems. However, we knew we needed to protect our innovation from being exploited by larger companies. - Source: dev.to / 8 months ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing CrossBrowserTesting and Pythagora, you can also consider the following products

BrowserStack - BrowserStack is a software testing platform for developers to comprehensively test websites and mobile applications for quality.

FunTEST - Hardware Test Automation Made Simple

Sauce Labs - Test mobile or web apps instantly across 700+ browser/OS/device platform combinations - without infrastructure setup.

The Ultimate SEO Prompt Collection - Unlock Your SEO Potential: 50+ Proven ChatGPT Prompts

browserling - Live interactive cross-browser testing from your browser.

SprintsQ - Automate repetitive manual tests and save 10X your time.