Software Alternatives & Startups
Register | Login

CrossBrowserTesting VS Marathon Cloud

Compare CrossBrowserTesting VS Marathon Cloud and see what are their differences

CrossBrowserTesting

Browser Testing made simple! Run automated, visual, and manual tests on 1500+ real browsers and mobile devices. Test more browsers, in less time.

Rating
0 reviews
Alternatives Is it good?
Marathon Cloud

Mobile UI tests on every pull request

Rating
0 reviews
Pricing
Paid Free trial $2 (device-hour)
Alternatives Is it good?
Schedule Forge
Forge your schedule, not spreadsheets. Drag-and-drop work orders, capacity-aware line scheduling, shop floor kiosk clocking, AI what-if scenarios, and a daily dashboard that tells you what needs attention. sponsored
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Which is more popular?

Based on our record, CrossBrowserTesting seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 6 times since March 2021.

social mentions
6 vs 0
Website Testing popularity
100% vs 0%
alternatives listed
132 vs 5

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

CrossBrowserTesting
Marathon Cloud
Website crossbrowsertesting.com marathonlabs.io
Pricing
Official pricing
Paid Free trial $2 (device-hour) Official pricing
Platforms —
SaaS MacOS Linux Windows +1
Company — Startup from Singapore · 1 - 9 employees · 2022
Listed in
Website Testing Browser Testing Automated Testing Project Management +1
Developer Tools Mobile App Develeopment Testing Mobile App Testing Mobile Test Automation UI Testing Android +4

About CrossBrowserTesting and Marathon Cloud

In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.

CrossBrowserTesting
Marathon Cloud

No description of CrossBrowserTesting yet.

Marathon Cloud runs Android and iOS UI test suites (Espresso, XCUITest, Maestro) on autoscaling virtual devices, targeting 15 minutes per run, with per-test retries and flaky-test detection. Pay-as-you-go: $2/hour per Android device, $3/hour per iOS device, billed per second. 50 free device hours...

Read more about Marathon Cloud

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

CrossBrowserTesting 7 features
Marathon Cloud 9 features
  • Wide Range of Browsers and Devices
    CrossBrowserTesting offers a large selection of browsers and devices, allowing developers to test their applications in various environments to ensure compatibility.
  • Live Testing
    Users can perform live interactive testing on real devices, enabling them to manually verify the behavior of their application and catch issues that automated tests might miss.
  • Automated Testing Integration
    The platform provides integration with popular testing frameworks and tools such as Selenium, Appium, and others, facilitating automated testing workflows.
  • Visual Testing
    CrossBrowserTesting offers visual testing capabilities, allowing users to compare screenshots from different browsers to identify design inconsistencies.
  • Comprehensive Reports
    Detailed test reports with screenshots and logs are generated, helping users to quickly identify and address issues found during testing.
  • Parallel Testing
    The service supports parallel testing, enabling users to run multiple tests simultaneously, significantly reducing the overall testing time.
  • Easy-to-Use Interface
    The user interface is intuitive and user-friendly, making it easy for both beginners and experienced testers to navigate and utilize the platform effectively.

Possible disadvantages

  • Cost
    CrossBrowserTesting can be expensive, especially for small teams or individual developers who might find the subscription plans to be cost-prohibitive.
  • Performance
    Tests on real devices can sometimes be slow due to the availability and network constraints, which can affect the overall efficiency of the testing process.
  • Limited Mobile Devices
    While the platform includes a variety of devices, the selection might not cover all the latest models or less common devices, potentially limiting testing coverage.
  • Learning Curve for Advanced Features
    Some advanced features and integrations might require a learning curve, which could be challenging for users who are not familiar with automated testing or the specific tools supported.
  • Test Timeout Issues
    Occasional issues with test timeouts have been reported, which can disrupt the testing process and require reruns or additional troubleshooting.
  • Autoscaling virtual devices
    Android emulators and iOS simulators, provisioned fresh for every run and destroyed when it ends
  • Pool sized from history
    Device count is chosen per run from your suite's historical duration, targeting 15 minutes. No parallel slots to buy
  • Per-test retries
    A failed test is rerun on a different device; tests that pass on retry are reported as flaky, not failed
  • Preventive retries
    Tests with a recently unstable history are retried from the start, so flakes stay off the critical path
  • Frameworks
    Espresso and instrumentation tests on Android, XCUITest on iOS, and Maestro flows on both
  • One CLI command
    marathon-cloud run android --application app.apk --test-application test.apk
  • CI integration
    Official GitHub Action, Bitrise step and Docker image; runs from any CI or a laptop
  • Reports and artifacts
    Allure report, JUnit XML, HTML timeline, per-test video and device logs
  • Free start
    50 free device hours on signup, no credit card

Analysis

An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.

CrossBrowserTesting
Marathon Cloud

Overall verdict

  • CrossBrowserTesting is generally regarded as a good solution for cross-browser testing needs, particularly for teams that require real-time testing and robust automation capabilities. Its ease of use, extensive browser/device coverage, and integration options make it a strong choice for many development and QA teams.

Why this product is good

  • CrossBrowserTesting is considered a valuable tool because it provides a cloud-based platform for testing websites and mobile applications across different browsers, devices, and operating systems. It enables developers and QA teams to ensure that their applications function correctly on various platforms without needing to maintain a complex setup of physical devices. The platform offers real-time debugging, automated screenshot testing, and integration with various CI/CD tools, which streamlines the testing process.

Recommended for

    This service is highly recommended for software development teams, QA engineers, and web developers who need to ensure compatibility and functionality of their web applications across multiple browsers and devices. It is particularly useful for organizations with a focus on maintaining high-quality user experiences across various platforms.

No analysis of Marathon Cloud yet.

Videos

Walkthroughs and reviews on video.

CrossBrowserTesting 1 video + Add
Marathon Cloud 0 videos + Add

Cross Browser Testing Tool Comparison – LambdaTest vs. CrossBrowserTesting

No Marathon Cloud videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
CrossBrowserTesting
Marathon Cloud
100% 100%
Website Testing
0% 0%
0% 0%
Mobile App Testing
100% 100%
100% 100%
Browser Testing
0% 0%
0% 0%
Testing
100% 100%

Questions & Answers

As answered by people managing CrossBrowserTesting and Marathon Cloud.

What makes your product unique?

Marathon Cloud's answer:

The device pool is sized for every run from your suite's own history, targeting 15 minutes, so there is no parallel device count to buy or tune. Failed tests are retried individually on a different device, and tests with a flaky history are retried preventively, so the report separates flaky from failed. It is built on Marathon, the open-source mobile test runner, so there is no lock-in: the same runner can bring execution back in-house.

Why should a person choose your product over its competitors?

Marathon Cloud's answer:

You pay $2 per hour per Android device and $3 per hour per iOS device, billed per second, instead of monthly per-parallel plans. You can start the same day with 50 free device hours and one CLI command, without a sales call. It runs Espresso, XCUITest and Maestro on emulators and simulators from any CI, which is where most UI suites run anyway; real-device clouds are better when a test truly needs physical hardware.

How would you describe the primary audience of your product?

Marathon Cloud's answer:

Mobile engineering teams, including Android and iOS developers, SDETs and platform or DevOps engineers, who want their full UI test suite to run on every pull request. Typically companies with an Espresso, XCUITest or Maestro suite that has outgrown one CI machine or a per-parallel device cloud.

What's the story behind your product?

Marathon Cloud's answer:

Marathon started in 2018 as an open-source test runner for Android and iOS, built to make large UI suites fast and stable through smart batching, sharding and per-test retries. It is used by teams running some of the largest consumer apps. Marathon Cloud launched in 2022 as the hosted version: the same engine, with devices, scaling and retries handled for you. MarathonLabs (TestWise Pte. Ltd., Singapore) is bootstrapped and profitable.

Which are the primary technologies used for building your product?

Marathon Cloud's answer:

Kotlin (the open-source Marathon runner), Go+Rust (cloud services and the CLI), Svelte and TypeScript (web), gRPC, Docker, Android emulators, and iOS simulators on Apple hardware.

Who are some of the biggest customers of your product?

Marathon Cloud's answer:

  • Tinder
  • Careem
  • Peloton
  • LTK
  • SafetyCulture
  • Plata

User comments

Share your experience with using CrossBrowserTesting and Marathon Cloud. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

CrossBrowserTesting 6 mentions
Marathon Cloud 0 mentions
  • How can I test my site on safari if I don't have a Mac ?
    Yeah I moved on pretty quick from browserstack, but it seems to be the most popular. I've tried crossbrowsertesting.com but at the moment I really like app.lambdatest.com. Source: almost 4 years ago
  • great list of "cool" sites from hnews
    Https://geizhals.de/ - this is a german site but the UI is nice and you can find a lot of stuff. Https://www.gsmarena.com/search.php3? - a phone search site. When I was at https://crossbrowsertesting.com we used this site a... - Source: dev.to / over 4 years ago
  • Learn How To Create, Test and Deploy a Single Page App with Vue 3 + Vite and Pinia
    Fortunately we don’t need to install, nor configure, any other tools, unless maybe some fancy reporters, but for now we can get everything we need in terms of end-to-end automated testing out of Nightwatch. Besides Chrome, Nightwatch has... - Source: dev.to / over 4 years ago

View more

Tracking Marathon Cloud since Sep 2026.

Alternatives to CrossBrowserTesting and Marathon Cloud

When comparing CrossBrowserTesting and Marathon Cloud, you can also consider the following products.

Loading...